Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 499

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

the engagement of engineering and similar services by the Department of Transportation.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) may engage

engineering, consulting, surveying, or other specialized services and this

engagement of services is exempt from certain provisions of law relating to state

procurement. Any engagement of services involving an expenditure of $3,000 or

more must be by formal contract approved by the governor. For an engagement of

services of more than $25,000, DOT must conduct a uniform cost-benefit analysis

before the engagement and must review periodically, and before any renewal, the

continued appropriateness of the engagement.

This bill eliminates the requirements that DOT: 1) conduct a uniform

cost-benefit analysis before an engagement of engineering, consulting, surveying,

or other specialized services involving an expenditure of more than $25,000; and 2)

review periodically and before any renewal the continued appropriateness of such an

engagement. The bill also requires DOT to annually submit a report to the

legislature limited to identifying, for the preceding fiscal year: 1) the total cost of

engineering services provided on projects performed predominantly by DOT

employees; 2) the total cost of engineering services provided on projects performed

predominantly through an engagement of engineering services; and 3) the total cost

of engineering services provided on projects performed jointly by DOT employees and

through an engagement of engineering services. The bill also includes requirements

for DOT to follow in computing the total cost of engineering services.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Lazich (R) , Olsen (R)

11 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Endsley (R) , Honadel (R) , Krug (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Stone (R) , Strachota (R) , Van Roy (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3

Failed 2–3 Mar 12, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Refused to table Senate amendment 1, Ayes 16, Noes 17

Failed 16–17 Mar 13, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lazich and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Honadel, Krug, Ballweg, Bies, Endsley, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Spanbauer, Stone, Strachota and Van Roy

  2. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  3. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3

  7. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Refused to table Senate amendment 1, Ayes 16, Noes 17

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Placed at the foot of the 11th order of business on the calendar of 03-13-2012

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to committee on Senate Organization

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Lassa, Erpenbach, Taylor, Vinehout, Holperin, C. Larson, King, Shilling, T. Cullen and S. Coggs

  16. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Cowles and Lazich

  17. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1