Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
the engagement of engineering and similar services by the Department of Transportation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) may engage
engineering, consulting, surveying, or other specialized services and this
engagement of services is exempt from certain provisions of law relating to state
procurement. Any engagement of services involving an expenditure of $3,000 or
more must be by formal contract approved by the governor. For an engagement of
services of more than $25,000, DOT must conduct a uniform cost-benefit analysis
before the engagement and must review periodically, and before any renewal, the
continued appropriateness of the engagement.
This bill eliminates the requirements that DOT: 1) conduct a uniform
cost-benefit analysis before an engagement of engineering, consulting, surveying,
or other specialized services involving an expenditure of more than $25,000; and 2)
review periodically and before any renewal the continued appropriateness of such an
engagement. The bill also requires DOT to annually submit a report to the
legislature limited to identifying, for the preceding fiscal year: 1) the total cost of
engineering services provided on projects performed predominantly by DOT
employees; 2) the total cost of engineering services provided on projects performed
predominantly through an engagement of engineering services; and 3) the total cost
of engineering services provided on projects performed jointly by DOT employees and
through an engagement of engineering services. The bill also includes requirements
for DOT to follow in computing the total cost of engineering services.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3
Failed 2–3 Mar 12, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Refused to table Senate amendment 1, Ayes 16, Noes 17
Failed 16–17 Mar 13, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lazich and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Honadel, Krug, Ballweg, Bies, Endsley, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Spanbauer, Stone, Strachota and Van Roy
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections
- Mar 1, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Refused to table Senate amendment 1, Ayes 16, Noes 17
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Placed at the foot of the 11th order of business on the calendar of 03-13-2012
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Lassa, Erpenbach, Taylor, Vinehout, Holperin, C. Larson, King, Shilling, T. Cullen and S. Coggs
- Mar 14, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Cowles and Lazich
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1