Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 499

The engagement of engineering and similar services by the Department of Transportation

Topics: Engineer, Surveying and surveyors, Transportation, Department of: Administration

Stopped in committee

The voted on it but didn't recommend it, so the full Senate never voted. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 21, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. The committee didn't recommend it.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) may engage engineering, consulting, surveying, or other specialized services and this engagement of services is exempt from certain provisions of law relating to state procurement. Any engagement of services involving an expenditure of $3,000 or more must be by formal contract approved by the governor. For an engagement of services of more than $25,000, DOT must conduct a uniform cost-benefit analysis before the engagement and must review periodically, and before any renewal, the continued appropriateness of the engagement.

This bill eliminates the requirements that DOT: 1) conduct a uniform cost-benefit analysis before an engagement of engineering, consulting, surveying, or other specialized services involving an expenditure of more than $25,000; and 2) review periodically and before any renewal the continued appropriateness of such an engagement. The bill also requires DOT to annually submit a report to the legislature limited to identifying, for the preceding fiscal year: 1) the total cost of engineering services provided on projects performed predominantly by DOT employees; 2) the total cost of engineering services provided on projects performed predominantly through an engagement of engineering services; and 3) the total cost of engineering services provided on projects performed jointly by DOT employees and through an engagement of engineering services. The bill also includes requirements for DOT to follow in computing the total cost of engineering services.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 13 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate vote

Failed, 2 to 3 · Mar 12, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Failed, 16 to 17 · Mar 13, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to table Senate amendment 1, Ayes 16, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 13, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  3. Mar 13, 2012

    “Placed at the foot of the 11th order of business on the calendar of 03-13-2012” (the official wording)

  4. Mar 12, 2012

    “Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  5. Mar 12, 2012

    The committee voted on it.

  6. Mar 8, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Mar 1, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Feb 21, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.

  9. Feb 21, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lazich and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Honadel, Krug, Ballweg, Bies, Endsley, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Spanbauer, Stone, Strachota and Van Roy

  2. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  3. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3

  7. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Lassa, Erpenbach, Taylor, Vinehout, Holperin, C. Larson, King, Shilling, T. Cullen and S. Coggs

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Refused to table Senate amendment 1, Ayes 16, Noes 17

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Placed at the foot of the 11th order of business on the calendar of 03-13-2012

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to committee on Senate Organization

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  16. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Cowles and Lazich

  17. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote