Senate Bill 504
Limiting the authority of a city, village, or town to enact a development moratorium ordinance
Topics: Land use planning and control, Municipality: Ordinance, Plats, Public health, Public safety, Public works, Town: Laws, Village: Ordinance
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 22, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 22, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 13, 2012
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 47 to 33
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 144
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Published 4-4-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a county board may engage in zoning and land use planning by creating a county planning agency or by designating a previously constituted county committee or commission as the county planning agency. If a county board creates or designates such an agency, the agency is required to direct the preparation of a county development plan for the physical development of the towns within the county and for the cities and villages within the county whose governing bodies agree to have their areas included in the county plan.
Also under current law, a city or village, or certain towns that exercise village powers, may create a city, village, or town plan commission to engage in zoning and land use planning. If a city, village, or town creates such a commission, the commission is required to adopt a master plan for the physical development of the city, village, or town, including in some instances, in the case of a city or village, unincorporated areas outside of the city or village that are related to the city's or village's development.
Read the full summary Show less
Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission creates a development plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an existing comprehensive plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. The required planning elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land use; and intergovernmental cooperation.
Subject to a number of limitations and conditions, this bill authorizes a city, village, or town (municipality) to enact a development moratorium ordinance if the municipality has enacted, is in the process of enacting or amending, or is exempt from having to enact, a comprehensive plan. The municipality may enact a development moratorium ordinance (moratorium) only if its governing body adopts a resolution stating either that a moratorium is needed to prevent a shortage in or the overburdening of its public facilities or that a moratorium is needed to address a significant threat to the public health or safety. In either case, the municipality must obtain a written report from a professional engineer stating that the possible effect on public facilities, or the possible threat to public health or safety, justifies the need for a moratorium. In the case of a possible health or safety threat, the report may also be from a physician or registered nurse.
The moratorium must contain a number of elements, including a statement describing the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, the actions the municipality intends to take to address the problem, and the length of time the moratorium will apply. The moratorium may remain in effect only until the municipality addresses the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, or for 12 months, whichever occurs first. The bill also authorizes the municipality to extend the moratorium for another six months if the problem is not addressed. In addition, a municipality may not enact a moratorium unless it first holds a public hearing at which the proposed ordinance is discussed.
The bill first applies to a land development plan that is submitted to a municipality on the effective date of the bill, although the municipality and the developer could agree to apply the moratorium retroactively.
Who's behind it
Frank G. Lasee, a Republican, is its .
4 more lawmakers .
See all 5 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (4)
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Steineke · Republican, Assembly
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing vote on an amendment
Passed, 4 to 3 · Mar 9, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Failed, 16 to 17 · Mar 13, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 16, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Failed, 16 to 17 · Mar 13, 2012
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (16)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jessica King (D, 18)
- Jim Holperin (D, 12)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Spencer Coggs (D, 6)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
No (17)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Pam Galloway (R, 29)
- Rich Zipperer (R, 33)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
Official motion: “Refused to reconsider vote by which bill was passed, Ayes 16, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 47 to 33 · Mar 15, 2012 · 17 didn't vote
See how each of the 97 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican
Yes (47)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bill Kramer (R, 97)
- Chad Weininger (R, 4)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Daniel LeMahieu (R, 59)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Don Pridemore (R, 22)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (R, 39)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeffrey Stone (R, 82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Knilans (R, 44)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Klenke (R, 88)
- Karl Van Roy (R, 90)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Mark Honadel (R, 21)
- Mary Williams (R, 87)
- Michelle Litjens (R, 56)
- Mike Endsley (R, 26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Pat Strachota (R, 58)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Roger Rivard (R, 75)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Scott Suder (R, 69)
- Steve Kestell (R, 27)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (33)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (D, 70)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Barbara Toles (D, 17)
- Bob Ziegelbauer (I, 25)
- Brett Hulsey (D, 78)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- Donna Seidel (D, 85)
- Fred Clark (D, 81)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Jon Richards (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (D, 71)
- Margaret Krusick (D, 7)
- Mark Pocan (D, 78)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (D, 57)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Richard Spanbauer (R, 53)
- Robert Turner (D, 61)
- Sandy Pasch (D, 10)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
Didn't vote (17)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Dan Meyer (R, 34)
- David Cullen (D, 13)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Elizabeth Coggs (D, 10)
- Erik Severson (R, 28)
- Evan Wynn (R, 43)
- Garey Bies (R, 1)
- Jason Fields (D, 11)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- John Murtha (R, 29)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- John Steinbrink (D, 65)
- Mark Radcliffe (D, 92)
- Tamara Grigsby (D, 18)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tony Staskunas (D, 15)
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 47, Noes 33, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Mar 22, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 144.
-
Mar 20, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 15, 2012
The Assembly passed it too, 47 to 33.
-
Mar 13, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Mar 13, 2012
“Messaged” (the official wording)
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Senate passed it.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Senate adopted it.
-
Mar 9, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.
-
Mar 9, 2012
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3” (the official wording)
-
Feb 29, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 29, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 22, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.
-
Feb 22, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Lasee;Cosponsored by Representatives Steineke, LeMahieu, Stroebel and Jacque
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Refused to refer to committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 16, Noes 17
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Refused to reconsider vote by which bill was passed, Ayes 16, Noes 17
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 9:26 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 47, Noes 33, Paired 2
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 19, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 20, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2012
- Mar 20, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012
- Mar 22, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 144
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-4-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote