Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 504

Limiting the authority of a city, village, or town to enact a development moratorium ordinance

Topics: Land use planning and control, Municipality: Ordinance, Plats, Public health, Public safety, Public works, Town: Laws, Village: Ordinance

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 22, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 22, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 47 to 33

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 144

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Published 4-4-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a county board may engage in zoning and land use planning by creating a county planning agency or by designating a previously constituted county committee or commission as the county planning agency. If a county board creates or designates such an agency, the agency is required to direct the preparation of a county development plan for the physical development of the towns within the county and for the cities and villages within the county whose governing bodies agree to have their areas included in the county plan.

Also under current law, a city or village, or certain towns that exercise village powers, may create a city, village, or town plan commission to engage in zoning and land use planning. If a city, village, or town creates such a commission, the commission is required to adopt a master plan for the physical development of the city, village, or town, including in some instances, in the case of a city or village, unincorporated areas outside of the city or village that are related to the city's or village's development.

Read the full summary

Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission creates a development plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an existing comprehensive plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. The required planning elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land use; and intergovernmental cooperation.

Subject to a number of limitations and conditions, this bill authorizes a city, village, or town (municipality) to enact a development moratorium ordinance if the municipality has enacted, is in the process of enacting or amending, or is exempt from having to enact, a comprehensive plan. The municipality may enact a development moratorium ordinance (moratorium) only if its governing body adopts a resolution stating either that a moratorium is needed to prevent a shortage in or the overburdening of its public facilities or that a moratorium is needed to address a significant threat to the public health or safety. In either case, the municipality must obtain a written report from a professional engineer stating that the possible effect on public facilities, or the possible threat to public health or safety, justifies the need for a moratorium. In the case of a possible health or safety threat, the report may also be from a physician or registered nurse.

The moratorium must contain a number of elements, including a statement describing the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, the actions the municipality intends to take to address the problem, and the length of time the moratorium will apply. The moratorium may remain in effect only until the municipality addresses the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, or for 12 months, whichever occurs first. The bill also authorizes the municipality to extend the moratorium for another six months if the problem is not addressed. In addition, a municipality may not enact a moratorium unless it first holds a public hearing at which the proposed ordinance is discussed.

The bill first applies to a land development plan that is submitted to a municipality on the effective date of the bill, although the municipality and the developer could agree to apply the moratorium retroactively.

Who's behind it

Frank G. Lasee, a Republican, is its ⁠.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 5 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing vote on an amendment

Passed, 4 to 3 · Mar 9, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Failed, 16 to 17 · Mar 13, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 16, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Failed, 16 to 17 · Mar 13, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Refused to reconsider vote by which bill was passed, Ayes 16, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 47 to 33 · Mar 15, 2012 · 17 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (47)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 47, Noes 33, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 22, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 144.

  3. Mar 20, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 47 to 33.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 13, 2012

    “Messaged” (the official wording)

  8. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  9. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Mar 9, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.

  11. Mar 9, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  12. Feb 29, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 29, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 22, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.

  15. Feb 22, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Lasee;Cosponsored by Representatives Steineke, LeMahieu, Stroebel and Jacque

  2. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing

  3. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee

  6. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  7. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  8. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Refused to refer to committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 16, Noes 17

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Refused to reconsider vote by which bill was passed, Ayes 16, Noes 17

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Messaged

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:26 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 47, Noes 33, Paired 2

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2012

  28. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012

  29. Mar 22, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 144

  30. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-4-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote