Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 504

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

limiting the authority of a city, village, or town to enact a development moratorium ordinance.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a county board may engage in zoning and land use planning

by creating a county planning agency or by designating a previously constituted

county committee or commission as the county planning agency. If a county board

creates or designates such an agency, the agency is required to direct the preparation

of a county development plan for the physical development of the towns within the

county and for the cities and villages within the county whose governing bodies agree

to have their areas included in the county plan.

Also under current law, a city or village, or certain towns that exercise village

powers, may create a city, village, or town plan commission to engage in zoning and

land use planning. If a city, village, or town creates such a commission, the

commission is required to adopt a master plan for the physical development of the

city, village, or town, including in some instances, in the case of a city or village,

unincorporated areas outside of the city or village that are related to the city's or

village's development.

Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a

city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission creates a development

plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an existing comprehensive

plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. The required planning

elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community

facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land

use; and intergovernmental cooperation.

Subject to a number of limitations and conditions, this bill authorizes a city,

village, or town (municipality) to enact a development moratorium ordinance if the

municipality has enacted, is in the process of enacting or amending, or is exempt

from having to enact, a comprehensive plan. The municipality may enact a

development moratorium ordinance (moratorium) only if its governing body adopts

a resolution stating either that a moratorium is needed to prevent a shortage in or

the overburdening of its public facilities or that a moratorium is needed to address

a significant threat to the public health or safety. In either case, the municipality

must obtain a written report from a professional engineer stating that the possible

effect on public facilities, or the possible threat to public health or safety, justifies the

need for a moratorium. In the case of a possible health or safety threat, the report

may also be from a physician or registered nurse.

The moratorium must contain a number of elements, including a statement

describing the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, the actions the

municipality intends to take to address the problem, and the length of time the

moratorium will apply. The moratorium may remain in effect only until the

municipality addresses the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, or for

12 months, whichever occurs first. The bill also authorizes the municipality to

extend the moratorium for another six months if the problem is not addressed. In

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Lasee (R)

4 cosponsors

Jacque (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Steineke (R) , Stroebel (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3

Passed 4–3 Mar 9, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Refused to refer to committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 16, Noes 17

Failed 16–17 Mar 13, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 47, Noes 33, Paired 2

Passed 47–33 Mar 15, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 47

Full history

  1. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Lasee;Cosponsored by Representatives Steineke, LeMahieu, Stroebel and Jacque

  2. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing

  3. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee

  6. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  7. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  8. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Refused to refer to committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 16, Noes 17

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Refused to reconsider vote by which bill was passed, Ayes 16, Noes 17

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Messaged

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:26 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24

  20. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 47, Noes 33, Paired 2

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2012

  28. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012

  29. Mar 22, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 144

  30. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-4-2012