Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
limiting the authority of a city, village, or town to enact a development moratorium ordinance.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a county board may engage in zoning and land use planning
by creating a county planning agency or by designating a previously constituted
county committee or commission as the county planning agency. If a county board
creates or designates such an agency, the agency is required to direct the preparation
of a county development plan for the physical development of the towns within the
county and for the cities and villages within the county whose governing bodies agree
to have their areas included in the county plan.
Also under current law, a city or village, or certain towns that exercise village
powers, may create a city, village, or town plan commission to engage in zoning and
land use planning. If a city, village, or town creates such a commission, the
commission is required to adopt a master plan for the physical development of the
city, village, or town, including in some instances, in the case of a city or village,
unincorporated areas outside of the city or village that are related to the city's or
village's development.
Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a
city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission creates a development
plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an existing comprehensive
plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. The required planning
elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community
facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land
use; and intergovernmental cooperation.
Subject to a number of limitations and conditions, this bill authorizes a city,
village, or town (municipality) to enact a development moratorium ordinance if the
municipality has enacted, is in the process of enacting or amending, or is exempt
from having to enact, a comprehensive plan. The municipality may enact a
development moratorium ordinance (moratorium) only if its governing body adopts
a resolution stating either that a moratorium is needed to prevent a shortage in or
the overburdening of its public facilities or that a moratorium is needed to address
a significant threat to the public health or safety. In either case, the municipality
must obtain a written report from a professional engineer stating that the possible
effect on public facilities, or the possible threat to public health or safety, justifies the
need for a moratorium. In the case of a possible health or safety threat, the report
may also be from a physician or registered nurse.
The moratorium must contain a number of elements, including a statement
describing the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, the actions the
municipality intends to take to address the problem, and the length of time the
moratorium will apply. The moratorium may remain in effect only until the
municipality addresses the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, or for
12 months, whichever occurs first. The bill also authorizes the municipality to
extend the moratorium for another six months if the problem is not addressed. In
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3
Passed 4–3 Mar 9, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Refused to refer to committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 16, Noes 17
Failed 16–17 Mar 13, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Refused to reconsider vote by which bill was passed, Ayes 16, Noes 17
Failed 16–17 Mar 13, 2012 official source full pageAye · 16
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jessica King (18)
- Jim Holperin (12)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Julie M. Lassa (24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (31)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Robert Jauch (25)
- Spencer Coggs (6)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Timothy Cullen (15)
Nay · 17
- Alberta Darling (8)
- Dale Schultz (17)
- Frank G. Lasee (1)
- Glenn Grothman (20)
- Joe Leibham (9)
- Leah Vukmir (5)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mary Lazich (28)
- Michael Ellis (19)
- Neal Kedzie (11)
- Pam Galloway (29)
- Rich Zipperer (33)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (10)
- Terry Moulton (23)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 47, Noes 33, Paired 2
Passed 47–33 Mar 15, 2012 official source full pageAye · 47
- Alvin Ott (3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (31)
- André Jacque (1)
- Bill Kramer (97)
- Chad Weininger (4)
- Chris Kapenga (33)
- Dale Kooyenga (5)
- Dan Knodl (24)
- Daniel LeMahieu (59)
- David Craig (28)
- Don Pridemore (22)
- Duey Stroebel (20)
- Edward Brooks (50)
- Gary Tauchen (6)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (39)
- Jeff Mursau (36)
- Jeffrey Stone (82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (52)
- Jerry Petrowski (29)
- Jim Ott (23)
- Joan Ballweg (14)
- Joe Knilans (44)
- Joel Kleefisch (38)
- John Klenke (88)
- Karl Van Roy (90)
- Kathleen Bernier (23)
- Keith Ripp (42)
- Kevin Petersen (57)
- Lee Nerison (96)
- Leon Young (16)
- Mark Honadel (21)
- Mary Williams (87)
- Michelle Litjens (56)
- Mike Endsley (26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (84)
- Pat Strachota (58)
- Paul F. Farrow (33)
- Robin Vos (33)
- Roger Rivard (75)
- Samantha Kerkman (61)
- Scott Krug (72)
- Scott Suder (69)
- Steve Kestell (27)
- Steve Nass (11)
- Travis Tranel (49)
- Tyler August (31)
- Warren Petryk (93)
Nay · 33
- Amy Sue Vruwink (70)
- Andy Jorgensen (43)
- Barbara Toles (17)
- Bob Ziegelbauer (25)
- Brett Hulsey (78)
- Chris Danou (92)
- Chris Taylor (76)
- Cory Mason (66)
- Donna Seidel (85)
- Fred Clark (81)
- Frederick Kessler (12)
- Gary Hebl (46)
- Gordon Hintz (54)
- Janet Bewley (25)
- Janis Ringhand (15)
- Jill Billings (95)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (8)
- Jon Richards (19)
- Josh Zepnick (9)
- Kelda Roys (26)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (71)
- Margaret Krusick (7)
- Mark Pocan (78)
- Nick Milroy (73)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (57)
- Peter Barca (64)
- Richard Spanbauer (53)
- Robert Turner (61)
- Sandy Pasch (10)
- Sondy Pope (80)
- Steve Doyle (94)
- Terese Berceau (77)
- Thomas Larson (67)
Not voting · 17
- Christine Sinicki (20)
- Dan Meyer (34)
- David Cullen (13)
- Dean Kaufert (53)
- Elizabeth Coggs (10)
- Erik Severson (28)
- Evan Wynn (43)
- Garey Bies (1)
- Jason Fields (11)
- Jim Steineke (5)
- John Murtha (29)
- John Nygren (89)
- John Steinbrink (65)
- Mark Radcliffe (92)
- Tamara Grigsby (18)
- Thomas Tiffany (12)
- Tony Staskunas (15)
Full history
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Lasee;Cosponsored by Representatives Steineke, LeMahieu, Stroebel and Jacque
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Refused to refer to committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 16, Noes 17
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Refused to reconsider vote by which bill was passed, Ayes 16, Noes 17
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 9:26 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 47, Noes 33, Paired 2
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 19, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 20, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2012
- Mar 20, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012
- Mar 22, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 144
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-4-2012