Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 526

Technical changes to the qualified production activities income and franchise tax credit

Topics: Corporation: Taxation, Farmland preservation, Franchise: Taxation, Income tax: Credit, Industrial development, Revenue, Department of

Passed the Senate, then stopped

The Senate passed it on Mar 6, 2012, but the Assembly never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 28, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Assembly never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the federal Internal Revenue Code, a taxpayer may claim a deduction equal to 9 percent of the taxpayer's qualified production activities income in the taxable year or 9 percent of the taxpayer's total taxable income, whichever is less.

For federal tax purposes, qualified production activities income is, generally, the amount of the taxpayer's domestic production gross receipts that exceed the sum of the cost of goods sold and other expenses, losses, or deductions. Domestic production gross receipts are, generally, gross receipts derived from property that was manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted in the United States.

Read the full summary

Under current law, as created by 2011 Wisconsin Act 32 , an individual taxpayer may claim a state income tax credit equal to the taxpayer's qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state, multiplied by a certain percentage. A corporation may claim a state income and franchise tax credit equal to the lesser of its taxable income apportioned to this state or its qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state, multiplied by a certain percentage. The percentage of qualified production activities income that a taxpayer may claim as a credit is 1.875 percent for 2013, 3.75 percent for 2014, 5.526 percent for 2015, and 7.5 percent for 2016 and for each year thereafter. Under current law, "qualified production activities income" means qualified production activities income as determined under the federal Internal Revenue Code for purposes of claiming a federal tax deduction.

This bill makes technical changes to the state tax credits for qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state in order to facilitate the Department of Revenue's administration of the credits. Specifically, the bill provides a method for determining the qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state rather than rely on the federal definition of "qualified production activities income," which includes income from economic activities in all states.

Who's behind it

Glenn Grothman, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 2, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 5, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Mar 6, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 9, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 9, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  4. Mar 6, 2012

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 03-06-2012” (the official wording)

  5. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  6. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  7. Mar 5, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  8. Mar 5, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  9. Mar 2, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Feb 29, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Feb 29, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 28, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues.

  13. Feb 28, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Grothman;Cosponsored by Representative Kooyenga

  2. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues

  3. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Lassa, Miller, Risser, S. Coggs, T. Cullen, Shilling, King, C. Larson, Holperin, Vinehout, Taylor, Erpenbach, Jauch and Hansen

  13. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 03-06-2012

  18. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  21. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:28 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24

  22. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kooyenga

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  24. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote