Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
technical changes to the qualified production activities income and franchise tax credit.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the federal Internal Revenue Code, a taxpayer may claim a deduction
equal to 9 percent of the taxpayer's qualified production activities income in the
taxable year or 9 percent of the taxpayer's total taxable income, whichever is less.
For federal tax purposes, qualified production activities income is, generally, the
amount of the taxpayer's domestic production gross receipts that exceed the sum of
the cost of goods sold and other expenses, losses, or deductions. Domestic production
gross receipts are, generally, gross receipts derived from property that was
manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted in the United States.
Under current law, as created by
2011 Wisconsin Act 32
, an individual taxpayer
may claim a state income tax credit equal to the taxpayer's qualified production
activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property
located in this state, multiplied by a certain percentage. A corporation may claim a
state income and franchise tax credit equal to the lesser of its taxable income
apportioned to this state or its qualified production activities income derived from
manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state, multiplied by
a certain percentage. The percentage of qualified production activities income that
a taxpayer may claim as a credit is 1.875 percent for 2013, 3.75 percent for 2014,
5.526 percent for 2015, and 7.5 percent for 2016 and for each year thereafter. Under
current law, "qualified production activities income" means qualified production
activities income as determined under the federal Internal Revenue Code for
purposes of claiming a federal tax deduction.
This bill makes technical changes to the state tax credits for qualified
production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural
property located in this state in order to facilitate the Department of Revenue's
administration of the credits. Specifically, the bill provides a method for determining
the qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or
agricultural property located in this state rather than rely on the federal definition
of "qualified production activities income," which includes income from economic
activities in all states.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 2, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 5, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
Passed 33–0 Mar 6, 2012 official source full pageAye · 33
- Alberta Darling (8)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dale Schultz (17)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Frank G. Lasee (1)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Glenn Grothman (20)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jessica King (18)
- Jim Holperin (12)
- Joe Leibham (9)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Julie M. Lassa (24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (31)
- Leah Vukmir (5)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Mary Lazich (28)
- Michael Ellis (19)
- Neal Kedzie (11)
- Pam Galloway (29)
- Rich Zipperer (33)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Robert Jauch (25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (10)
- Spencer Coggs (6)
- Terry Moulton (23)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Timothy Cullen (15)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Full history
- Feb 28, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Grothman;Cosponsored by Representative Kooyenga
- Feb 28, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Lassa, Miller, Risser, S. Coggs, T. Cullen, Shilling, King, C. Larson, Holperin, Vinehout, Taylor, Erpenbach, Jauch and Hansen
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 03-06-2012
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 9:28 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kooyenga
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1