Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 537

The regulation of aquaculture

Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Fish and fishing: Commercial, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection, Natural Resources, Department of: Hunting and fishing, Water: Pollution, Wetland

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 1, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 15, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 207

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Aquaculture Use of natural bodies of water Under current law, a person may not use a natural body of water as a fish farm unless the water body is a freeze-out pond or preexisting fish rearing facility and unless the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) issues person a permit (natural water body permit). The person and the water body must also meet certain additional conditions. One of those conditions requires DNR to determine that no substantial public interest exists in the body of water and that no public or private rights in the body of water will be damaged (interest and rights determination). This bill provides that the requirement to obtain a natural water body permit, the requirement that the water body be a freeze-out pond or preexisting fish rearing facility, and the requirement that DNR make an interest and rights determination do not apply to a person seeking to use a natural body of water as a fish farm if the person has been issued a permit with respect to that body of water that authorizes the person to change the course of or straighten a stream, to enlarge a waterway, or to construct a dam.

Generally, under current law, DNR must renew a natural water body permit unless DNR finds that there has been a substantial change in circumstances related to DNR's interest and rights determination. This bill provides that a natural water body permit, once issued, does not expire unless DNR makes such a finding.

Read the full summary

This bill also prohibits DNR from promulgating rules that require DNR, before it issues a natural water body permit, to hold a hearing or provide notice that it will not hold a hearing. In addition, the bill requires DNR to post notice of every application for a natural water body permit on DNR's Internet Web site.

Wastewater discharge permits Current law generally prohibits a person from discharging pollutants into the surface water or groundwater without a wastewater discharge permit from DNR.

The law requires persons required to have permits, other than persons who operate livestock farms, to pay an annual wastewater discharge fee based in part on the amount of pollutants discharged. The fees are deposited into the general fund.

This bill exempts persons who operate fish farms from the wastewater discharge fee.

The bill also requires DNR to include, in wastewater discharge permits for fish farms that produce more than 100,000 pounds of fish per year, requirements that are based on, and are not more stringent than, requirements in a specified regulation of the federal Environmental Protection Agency applicable to those fish farms.

Record-keeping Current law requires a person who operates a fish farm to keep records on purchases, sales, and production of fish and fish eggs and any other records required by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP).

This bill provides that a person who operates a fish farm is not required to keep records on the sale of fish to an individual for the individual's personal use.

Importing fish Current law generally requires a person who brings fish or fish eggs into this state for the purpose of introduction into lakes or streams, of use as bait, or of rearing in a fish farm without an annual permit issued by DATCP.

This bill exempts a person bringing fish or fish eggs from a fish farm in another state to a fish farm in this state from the requirement to have an importation permit if the person has a fish health certificate that covers the fish or fish eggs and that complies with DATCP's rules on fish health certificates.

Current law exempts DNR from the requirement to have a permit from DATCP to bring fish into this state. This bill eliminates that exemption.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 3 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environment vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 9, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources and Environment, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 12, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Mar 13, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 5, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 3, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 207.

  3. Mar 30, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Mar 15, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Mar 13, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  9. Mar 13, 2012

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  10. Mar 12, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Mar 12, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  12. Mar 12, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Mar 9, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  14. Mar 9, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Mar 1, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.

  16. Mar 1, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Holperin, Jauch, Kedzie, Schultz and Vinehout;Cosponsored by Representatives Marklein, Krug, Brooks, Bewley, Endsley and Spanbauer

  2. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources and Environment

  3. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources and Environment, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  6. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a coauthor

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:32 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24

  20. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 29, 2012 · Senate

    LRB correction

  28. Mar 29, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-29-2012

  29. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012

  30. Apr 3, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 207

  31. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-16-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote