Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
changes to BadgerCare Plus and BadgerCare Plus Core programs by the department of health services and by waiver, disallowing certain carry-forward amounts for combined reporting purposes, and making an appropriation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, the Department of Health Services (DHS) administers the Medical
Assistance (MA) program, which is a joint federal and state program that provides
health services to individuals who have limited resources. Some services are
provided through programs that operate under a waiver of federal Medicaid laws,
including services provided through the BadgerCare Plus (BC+) and BadgerCare
Plus Core (BC+ Core) programs. Current law requires DHS to study potential
changes to MA for certain purposes. If DHS determines that revision of existing
statutes or rules would be necessary to advance any of the purposes for which the
study was conducted, DHS may propose a policy to take certain actions including:
modifying existing benefits and offering different benefits packages to different
groups of MA recipients, restricting or eliminating presumptive eligibility, setting
standards for establishing and verifying eligibility requirements; developing
standards and methodologies to assure accurate eligibility determinations and
redetermine continuing eligibility, and reducing income levels for purposes of
determining eligibility. Before implementing a policy that conflicts with a state
statute, DHS must submit to the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF), under the
committee's passive review process, the proposed amendment to the state MA plan
or proposed waiver of federal Medicaid law. If JCF does not reject the proposed plan
amendment or waiver request, DHS must submit the amendment or waiver request
to the federal government, if necessary, to the extent necessary to implement the
policy. If the federal government does not allow the amendment or does not grant
the waiver, DHS may not implement the policy.
Under current law, BC+ provides health and medical services to eligible
recipients and has a standard plan with a larger set of benefits and a Benchmark
plan with fewer benefits. Recipients of standard BC+ benefits may be required to pay
certain copayments for services. BC+ recipients under the standard plan, with some
exceptions, are also required to pay premiums. Recipients of BC+ under the
Benchmark plan have increased copayments and coinsurance for certain services
and higher premiums compared to recipients under the standard plan.
Under current law, the following individuals, among others, are eligible for
benefits under the BC+ standard plan: a pregnant women whose family income does
not exceed 200% of the federal poverty line (FPL); a child meeting certain criteria
whose family income does not exceed 200% of the FPL; a child meeting certain
criteria whose family income exceeds 150% of the FPL but the difference between the
actual family income and 150% of the FPL is expended on behalf of a member of the
child's family or the child for certain medical or health reasons; a parent or caretaker
relative of a child whose family income does not exceed 200% of the FPL; and an
individual who qualifies for a transitional extension of MA benefits even though his
or her income increases above the poverty line. Except for pregnant women and
certain children and other individuals, individuals who are otherwise eligible for
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: C. Larson (D) , Carpenter (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Holperin (D) , Jauch (D) , Lassa (D) , Miller (D) , Risser (D) , S. Coggs (D) , Shilling (D) , T. Cullen (D) , Wirch (D)
27 cosponsors
Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Bewley (D) , Billings (D) , C. Taylor (D) , D. Cullen (D) , Grigsby (D) , Hebl (D) , Hulsey (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Milroy (D) , Pasch (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Seidel (D) , Staskunas (D) , Steinbrink (D) , Toles (D) , Turner (D) , Vinehout (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)
Full history
- Mar 1, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Carpenter, S. Coggs, T. Cullen, Hansen, Holperin, Jauch, C. Larson, Lassa, Miller, Risser, Shilling and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Richards, Pasch, Barca, Berceau, Bewley, Billings, D. Cullen, Grigsby, Hebl, Hulsey, Kessler, Mason, Milroy, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Ringhand, Roys, Seidel, Staskunas, Steinbrink, C. Taylor, Toles, Turner, Young, Zamarripa and Zepnick
- Mar 1, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance
- Mar 14, 2012 · Senate
Senator Vinehout added as a coauthor
- Mar 15, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1