Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
external review process of health benefit plan decisions.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a health insurer must have an internal grievance procedure
and an independent review procedure whereby an insured person may appeal
certain types of coverage denials to an independent review organization. This bill
makes the following changes to the independent review process that health insurers
must provide:
1. Under current law, with some exceptions, an insured must exhaust the
internal grievance procedure before the insured may request an independent review
of a coverage denial. The bill adds as another exception to that requirement that the
insurer or another entity other than the insured did not meet all of the timelines
required under the internal grievance procedure.
2. Under current law, access to the independent review process must be
provided for a reduction, denial, or termination of treatment or payment for
treatment related to the admission to a facility, the availability of care, or the
continued stay in a facility (adverse determination) if the amount of the reduction
or the cost of the denied or terminated treatment exceeds $250, adjusted in
accordance with the consumer price index. Also under current law, access to the
independent review process must be provided for a denial of treatment on the basis
that the treatment is experimental (experimental treatment determination) if the
cost of the denied treatment exceeds $250, adjusted in accordance with the consumer
price index. The bill removes the minimum dollar amount for both adverse
determinations and experimental treatment determinations.
3. Under current law, the insured selects an independent review organization
and notifies the insurer both that he or she is requesting an independent review and
which independent review organization he or she has selected to conduct the review.
Under the bill, the insured notifies both the insurer and the commissioner of
insurance (commissioner) that he or she is requesting an independent review, and
the commissioner then, within two business days, randomly selects the independent
review organization that will conduct the review.
4. Current law provides a timeline within which an insurer must submit
information to the independent review organization and the independent review
organization must make a decision. The bill generally does not change the timeline,
but specifies that in no case may the independent review organization send its
written decision to the insured and insurer more than 60 days after it was notified
of its selection by the commissioner.
5. Current law provides an expedited timeline for independent reviews when
the independent review organization determines that, due to the insured's health
condition, following the usual timeline would jeopardize the insured's life or health
(urgent matters). The bill eliminates the expedited timeline and provides, simply,
that in urgent matters the independent review organization must notify the insured
and insurer of its decision no more than four business days after it was notified of its
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Erpenbach and Carpenter;Cosponsored by Representatives Richards, Berceau, Pasch, Pope-Roberts and Turner
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Mar 29, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received