Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 568

Periodic review of administrative rules

Topics: Administrative rules, Legislature: Review of Administrative Rules, Joint Committee for, State agencies

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 15, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Senate Organization. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a state agency (agency) may promulgate administrative rules (rules) to interpret the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute.

This bill requires periodic review of rules. Specifically, the bill requires every agency that has promulgated rules to determine which of those rules has been in effect for ten years without being modified or revised. The bill, however, permits agencies to make that determination with respect to a rule that is in effect on January 1, 2013, which is the effective date of the bill, during a five-year grace period beginning on that date. If an agency determines that a rule has been in effect for ten years without being modified or revised, the agency must submit a report regarding the rule to the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR). The report must include all of the following:

Read the full summary

1. An analysis of the continued need for the rule; the nature and merits of any complaints or comments received from the public regarding the rule; the complexity of the rule; the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with federal regulations, other state rules, or local ordinances; and the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the subject area affected by the rule since the rule was promulgated or last modified or revised.

2. Recommendations to delete any obsolete provisions of the rule; to address any meritorious complaints or comments received from the public regarding the rule;

to simplify any unnecessarily complex provisions of the rule; to eliminate any overlap, duplication, or conflict of the rule with federal regulations, other state rules, or local ordinances; and to modernize the rule in light of technological, economic, or other changes in the subject area affected by the rule since the rule was promulgated or last modified or revised.

JCRAR then must review the report using a 14-day passive review process.

Specifically, if the cochairpersons of JCRAR do not notify the head of the agency that JCRAR has scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the report within 14 working days after receipt of the report, the rule identified in the report continues in effect and the agency may proceed with rule making to revise the rule in accordance with its recommendations. If, however, the cochairpersons of JCRAR notify the head of the agency, within those 14 working days, that JCRAR has scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the report, JCRAR may schedule a meeting to review the report. At the conclusion of its review, JCRAR may do any of the following:

1. Approve the rule in its current form, as modified by the agency's recommendations, in which case the rule continues in effect and the agency may proceed with rule making to revise the rule in accordance with those recommendations.

2. Approve the rule in its current form, but object to the agency's recommendations, in which case the rule continues in effect and the agency may submit modified recommendations to JCRAR.

3. Object to the rule in its current form, but approve the agency's recommendations, in which case JCRAR may suspend the rule and the agency may proceed with rule making to revise the rule in accordance with those recommendations.

4. Object to the rule in its current form and to the agency's recommendations, in which case JCRAR may suspend the rule and the agency may submit modified recommendations to JCRAR.

5. Refer the report to a standing committee in each house of the legislature, in which case each standing committee to which the report is referred may approve or object to the rule in its current form and the agency's recommendations and JCRAR may concur or nonconcur in the actions of those standing committees or otherwise approve or object to the rule and those recommendations.

Who's behind it

Julie M. Lassa, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 3 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (2)

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 15, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  3. Mar 15, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Lassa;Cosponsored by Representatives Barca and Turner

  2. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  3. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  4. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor