Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 57

Corrections and sentencing

Topics: Circuit court, Crime and criminals: Felony, Crime victim, Earned Release Review Commission, Parole or probation, Sentences and penalties

Became law

The governor signed it on Jul 20, 2011. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 8, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 19 to 14

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 68 to 29

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 38

Latest entry in the official record, Jul 21, 2011: “Published 8-2-2011”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

2009 Wisconsin Act 28 (the Act) made several changes to the adult correctional system, most of which took effect on October 1, 2009. Prior to the effective date of the provisions relating to the adult correctional system (pre-Act), a person who was imprisoned for a felony he or she committed prior to December 31, 1999, was allowed to petition the parole commission in the Department of Corrections (DOC) to be released to parole after the person served 25 percent of his or her sentence, or six months, whichever was greater. The parole commission determined whether, and under what conditions, the person should be released to parole. A person who committed a felony on or after December 31, 1999, is sentenced to a bifurcated sentence, with the first portion of the sentence served in confinement and the second portion served under extended supervision in the community.

Pre-Act, a person who was serving a bifurcated sentence was, with few exceptions, required to serve the entire confinement portion of his or her sentence before being released to extended supervision. A person's confinement portion could have been extended if he or she violated a prison regulation. If a person's confinement portion was extended for such a violation, the law pre-Act required his or her extended supervision portion to be reduced so that the total length of the person's sentence remained unchanged.

Read the full summary

The law pre-Act allowed a person who is sentenced to a bifurcated sentence for a Class C to Class I felony to petition the sentencing court to adjust his or her sentence and release the person from prison to extended supervision if he or she has served 85 percent (for Class C to Class E felonies) or 75 percent (for Class F to Class I felonies) of the confinement portion of the sentence. If a person's confinement portion was reduced by the sentencing court, the law pre-Act required his or her extended supervision portion to be extended so that the total length of the person's sentence remained unchanged. Pre-Act, a person who was released to extended supervision was required to serve his or her entire sentence before extended supervision terminated.

The Act renamed the parole commission the earned release review commission (ERRC) and allows most persons who are incarcerated for a Class C to Class I felony to earn "positive adjustment time" toward early release from confinement. Under the Act, the amount of positive adjustment time a person can earn varies depending on the classification of the felony, the person's history and likelihood of reoffending, and other factors determined by DOC.

The Act allows DOC to release the person to extended supervision when he or she serves his entire period of confinement, minus positive adjustment time earned, subject to court review. Under the Act, if a person's period of confinement is reduced by positive adjustment time, his or her period of extended supervision is increased so that the length of the sentence does not change. The Act requires the ERRC to perform the duties previously performed by the parole commission and to review petitions for early release from confinement.

Under the Act, the sentencing court could, at the time of sentencing, order a person to serve a risk reduction sentence. A person serving a risk reduction sentence could be eligible for early release to extended supervision if he or she complies with a treatment plan developed for the person by DOC.

Pre-Act, persons who had committed most felonies were allowed to petition the sentencing court for release to extended supervision for the remaining term of his or her sentence if the person had a terminal condition, reached age 65 after serving at least five years of his or her term of confinement portion, or reached age 60 after serving at least ten years of his or her term of confinement portion.

Under the Act, the petition may also be filed by a person with any serious health condition and must be submitted to the ERRC instead of to the sentencing court. In addition, under the Act, DOC may release to extended supervision any person serving the confinement portion of a bifurcated sentence if the person is not confined following a violent offense, the person is believed to be able to live in the community without assaulting another, and the release will not be more than 12 months before the date that the person otherwise would be eligible for release to extended supervision. If DOC releases a person, his or her term of extended supervision must be extended by the length of time he or she was originally sentenced to confinement so that the total length of the sentence does not change.

Pre-Act, if a person sentenced to a bifurcated sentence violated any condition of his or her release to extended supervision, the person's extended supervision was revoked, he or she was returned to prison, and the division of hearings and appeals within DOA or DOC (reviewing authority) made a recommendation to the court that convicted the person as to how long the person should remain in prison. After it received the reviewing authority's recommendation, the court was allowed to order the person to remain in prison for a period that did not exceed the time remaining on his or her bifurcated sentence.

Under the Act, the reviewing authority determines how long to imprison the person whose extended supervision is revoked and enters its own order for the person to remain in prison for a period that does not exceed the time remaining on his or her bifurcated sentence.

This bill eliminates positive adjustment time and risk reduction sentences, restores the parole commission, eliminates the ERRC, and returns the sentencing provisions, and most of the provisions relating to early release from confinement to pre-Act law. Under the bill, a person may petition the sentencing court for release to extended supervision for the remaining term of his or her sentence if the person has an extraordinary health condition, reaches age 65 after serving at least five years of his or her term of confinement portion, or reaches age 60 after serving at least ten years of his or her term of confinement portion.

Under the bill, a person who was sentenced after October 1, 2009, but before the effective date of the bill, and who earned positive adjustment time during that period may petition the sentencing court for an early release to extended supervision. If the sentencing court agrees to reduce the confinement portion of the person's sentence by the number of positive adjustment time days he or she earned, the sentencing court must increase the term of extended supervision by the same number of days.

Under the bill, a person who was sentenced to a risk reduction sentence after October 1, 2009, but before the effective date of the bill and who complied with the program plan developed by DOC may be released to extended supervision after he or she serves at least 75 percent of the confinement portion of his or her sentence.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

28 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 33 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (28)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 13 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · May 10, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Failed, 13 to 20 · May 11, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 13, Noes 20”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 19 to 14 · May 11, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 19 to 14 · May 11, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 19 to 14 · May 11, 2011

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Decision of the Chair stands as the judgement of the Senate, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 19 to 14 · May 11, 2011

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Decision of the Chair stands as the judgement of the Senate, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to set it aside

Failed, 14 to 19 · May 11, 2011

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Refused to lay on the table, Ayes 14, Noes 19”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 19 to 14 · May 11, 2011

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Decision of the Chair stands as the judgement of the Senate, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 22 to 11 · May 11, 2011

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 22, Noes 11”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 57 to 37 · May 17, 2011 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (57)

No (37)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 57, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 86 to 7 · May 17, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 86, Noes 7”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 36 · May 17, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 68 to 29 · Jun 8, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (68)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 68, Noes 29”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Jul 21, 2011

    The new law was published.

  2. Jul 20, 2011

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 38.

  3. Jul 18, 2011

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 8, 2011

    The Assembly passed it too, 68 to 29.

  5. May 17, 2011

    “Point of order that Assembly amendment 2 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(d) well taken” (the official wording)

  6. May 11, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. May 11, 2011

    The Assembly received it.

  8. May 11, 2011

    The Senate passed it, 22 to 11.

  9. May 11, 2011

    “Point of order that the bill is not properly before the senate not well taken” (the official wording)

  10. May 11, 2011

    “Point of order that Senate amendment 4 not germane well taken” (the official wording)

  11. May 11, 2011

    “Point of order that Senate amendment 3 not germane well taken” (the official wording)

  12. May 11, 2011

    The Senate adopted it, 19 to 14.

  13. May 10, 2011

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  14. May 10, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  15. May 6, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. May 5, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. May 2, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Apr 20, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Apr 14, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Apr 8, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs.

  21. Apr 8, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 8, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Leibham, Moulton, Zipperer and Galloway;Cosponsored by Representatives Suder, Krug, Jacque, Petersen, Spanbauer, Ziegelbauer, Steineke, Severson, T. Larson, Kestell, Mursau, Thiesfeldt, LeMahieu, Strachota, Kleefisch, Murtha, Endsley, Marklein, Rivard, Honadel, Bies, Kaufert, Stone, Brooks, Petryk, Ripp and Knodl

  2. Apr 8, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs

  3. Apr 14, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 20, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. May 2, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 5, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. May 6, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  10. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  12. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-11-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Wanggaard and Lazich

  14. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  16. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senators Taylor, Vinehout, C. Larson, T. Cullen, Risser, Miller and S. Coggs

  17. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  18. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 offered by Senators Holperin, Hansen, Wirch, Lassa, Vinehout and Miller

  19. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Point of order that Senate amendment 3 not germane well taken

  20. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Decision of the Chair stands as the judgement of the Senate, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  21. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 offered by Senators Hansen, Wirch, Lassa, Vinehout and Miller

  22. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Point of order that Senate amendment 4 not germane well taken

  23. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Decision of the Chair stands as the judgement of the Senate, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  24. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Refused to refer to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 13, Noes 20

  25. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Refused to lay on the table, Ayes 14, Noes 19

  26. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Point of order that the bill is not properly before the senate not well taken

  29. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Decision of the Chair stands as the judgement of the Senate, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  30. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 22, Noes 11

  31. May 11, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. May 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  33. May 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  34. May 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2011 by committee on Rules

  35. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  36. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  37. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  38. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Radcliffe

  39. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 86, Noes 7

  40. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Radcliffe

  41. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly amendment 2 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(d) well taken

  42. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Pasch, Grigsby, Hintz, Kessler, Zamarripa, Sinicki, Seidel, Berceau and Young

  43. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36

  44. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  45. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 57, Noes 37

  46. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 68, Noes 29

  47. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  48. Jun 9, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  49. Jun 15, 2011 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)

  50. Jun 15, 2011 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 6-15-2011

  51. Jul 18, 2011 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 7-18-2011

  52. Jul 20, 2011 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 7-19-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 38

  53. Jul 21, 2011 · Senate

    Published 8-2-2011

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote