Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
cost-benefit analyses and continued appropriateness reviews when state agencies contract for services.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, the Department of Administration (DOA) or any state agency to
which DOA delegates purchasing authority may contract for services if the services
can be performed more efficiently or economically by contract than by state
employees. Also, under current law, if a state agency enters into or renews a contract
for services that involves an estimated expenditure of more than $25,000, the agency
must conduct either a uniform cost-benefit analysis, for a new contract, or a
continued appropriateness review, for a contract renewal. This bill exempts from
this requirement services that federal or state law requires to be performed by
contract; services that are incidental to the purchase of a commodity; services that
are substantially dissimilar to services a state employee performs; and services that
must be provided per a contract, license, or warranty by the original equipment
manufacturer or publisher. Also, under the bill, no cost-benefit analysis or
continued appropriateness review may be conducted by contract and no cost-benefit
analysis may be shown to any bidder until a letter of intent to contract has been
issued.
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 15, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lassa and Vinehout;Cosponsored by Representatives Jorgensen, Roys, Turner and Ringhand
- Mar 15, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 15, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1