Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 573

State contractual services and cost-benefit analyses

Topics: Administration, Department of: Budget and fiscal issues, Budget bills and process, Legislative Fiscal Bureau, Purchasing, Government, State agencies, Transportation, Department of: Administration, University of Wisconsin: Finance

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 15, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 21, 2012: “Fiscal estimate received”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Senate Organization. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires executive branch state agencies, except for the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the University of Wisconsin System (UW System), to submit to the Department of Administration (DOA) and the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, by September 15 of each even-numbered year, and requires the secretary of administration to include in the biennial budget report, all of the following:

1. Information on the number of contracted positions, including the number of service hours and recurring service rate payments, providing services for the agency that are paid from the agency's base level funding and an identification of the appropriation or appropriations used to fund the contracted positions.

Read the full summary

2. The total amount of agency base level funding used to pay for the contracted positions; and the amount of funding requested for contracted positions and an identification of the appropriation or appropriations that will be used to fund the contracted positions.

3. Information on cost-benefit analyses or continued appropriateness analyses, including whether the agencies contracted for the services or used a state employee and the actual cost of completing the services.

This bill requires DOT and the UW System to submit to DOA and the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, by September 15 of each even-numbered year, and requires the secretary of administration to include in the biennial budget report, the total amount budgeted and requested for contract expenditures, an identification of the appropriation or appropriations used to fund the contract expenditures, and the total amount of base level funding used to pay for the contract expenditures.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Democrats.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. May 21, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  2. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  3. Mar 15, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lassa and Vinehout;Cosponsored by Representatives Jorgensen, Roys, Turner and Ringhand

  2. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  3. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  4. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  5. May 21, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate