Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
state contractual services and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if a state agency enters into or renews a contract for services
that involves an estimated expenditure of more than $25,000, the agency must, in
accordance with standards prescribed by the Department of Administration (DOA),
conduct either a uniform cost-benefit analysis, for a new contract, or a continued
appropriateness review, for a contract renewal. In addition, if the estimated cost
exceeds $50,000, DOA must generally invite bids or proposals to be submitted and
award the contract to the entity that submits the lowest bid or most advantageous
competitive proposal.
Current law exempts from the requirements certain contracts for engineering
services or architectural services done for the state if DOA approves the contract.
Under this bill, these services remain exempt from the requirements, but an
engineer or an architect at DOA must determine if the project could be completed
more effectively and efficiently with state employees before DOA may approve the
contract.
Current law also exempts from the requirements contracts with the
Department of Transportation (DOT). Instead, under current law, DOT must, in
accordance with standards prescribed by DOT, conduct a uniform cost-benefit
analysis, or continued appropriateness review, of each proposed engagement that
involves an estimated expenditure of more than $25,000. Under this bill, DOT must
submit a report, with respect to the previous fiscal year, to the governor and the
legislature on the following:
1. The number, value, and nature of contractual engagements of services
authorized by DOT.
2. A summary of the cost-benefit analyses completed.
3. Recommendations for elimination of unneeded contractual engagements of
services and for consolidation or resolicitation of existing contractual engagements
of services.
4. An identification of all contractors engaged, contract amount, duration, and
services to be provided, as well as aggregated value of contracts for each contractor,
distinguishing between initial contracts and extended or renewed contracts and
specifying the termination date of each contract.
5. A summary of DOT's contract review activities.
6. An identification of contract services by code according to the type of services.
7. An identification of any contracts awarded by other than usual and
customary contracting procedures, including any single-source contracts.
Then, under this bill, within 30 days of completion of a contract for
engagements of services that involves an expenditure of more than $50,000, DOT
must submit to the governor and the legislature a summary of the purpose of the
contract, including why it was necessary to enter into the contract; the amount spent
on the contract; if the contract was awarded by other than usual and customary
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 15, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lassa and Vinehout;Cosponsored by Representatives Jorgensen, Roys, Turner and Ringhand
- Mar 15, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 15, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- May 4, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received