Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 65

The effect of an order denying, limiting, discontinuing, or prohibiting parental visitation with a child who is adjudged to be in need of protection or services, who is the subject of a termination of parental rights petition, or who is in sustaining care following a termination of parental rights on visitation between the child and a sibling and requiring a child's permanency plan to include a statement as to whether visitation between the child and a sibling is in the best interests of the child and sibling when parental visitation is denied, limited, discontinued, or prohibited

Topics: Children and Families, Department of, Children: Protection and services

Passed the Senate, then stopped

The Senate passed it on Mar 13, 2012, but the Assembly never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 18, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Assembly never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the Children's Code (juvenile court) may set reasonable rules of visitation for the parent of a child adjudged to be in need of protection or services. Current law also permits the juvenile court to issue a temporary order or injunction prohibiting a person whose parental rights are sought to be terminated involuntarily from visiting or contacting the child who is the subject of the termination of parental rights (TPR) petition. In addition, current law permits the juvenile court to prohibit visitation by a birth parent of a child who has been placed in sustaining care following a TPR.

This bill provides that a denial, limitation, or discontinuation of parental visitation with a child adjudged to be in need of protection or services, a temporary order or injunction prohibiting a person whose parental rights are sought to be terminated from visiting or contacting the child who is the subject of the TPR petition, or a prohibition on visitation by a birth parent of a child in sustaining care following a TPR does not affect visitation between the child and any sibling of the child, including a person who was a sibling of the child before adoption of or TPR to the person, which visitation shall be granted, denied, or continued based on the best interests of the child and sibling, regardless of whether parental visitation is denied, limited, discontinued, or prohibited.

Read the full summary

The bill also requires an agency preparing a permanency plan for a child, which is a plan designed to ensure that the child is reunified with his or her family whenever appropriate or that the child quickly attains a placement or home providing long-term stability, to include in the permanency plan a statement as to whether visitation between the child and any sibling of the child, including a person who was a sibling of the child before adoption of or TPR to the person, would be in the best interests of the child and sibling when parental visitation has been denied, limited, discontinued, or prohibited by the juvenile court or when the agency recommends that parental visitation be denied, limited, discontinued, or prohibited.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. 2 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 5 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (2)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Public Health vote on an amendment

Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 9, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 15, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  4. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  6. Mar 9, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  7. Mar 9, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 4, Noes 1” (the official wording)

  8. Apr 21, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Apr 18, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue.

  10. Apr 18, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 18, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lazich, Galloway and Lassa;Cosponsored by Representatives Kaufert and Kestell

  2. Apr 18, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue

  3. Apr 21, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lazich

  5. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  6. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Mar 9, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  16. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  17. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote