Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 76

Costs of administering tests for intoxication

Topics: Court: Fee, Implied consent or alcohol concentration, Police

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 27, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a law enforcement officer may request a person to provide a sample of breath, blood, or urine for analysis if the person is arrested for operating while intoxicated, or with a prohibited alcohol or drug concentration a vehicle, an all-terrain vehicle, a boat, or a snowmobile or for injury or homicide by intoxicated use of a vehicle (OWI-related offense). Upon the request of a law enforcement officer, a test facility must perform an analysis of a person's sample of blood or urine.

Current law allows the person to request an alternative test free of charge.

Read the full summary

Currently, if a person is ordered to pay a forfeiture or found to have committed an offense in municipal or circuit court, or if the person is found guilty of a crime, the person is required to pay certain costs, fees, and surcharges.

Under this bill, if a person is found to have committed an OWI-related offense, the municipal or circuit court must assess costs associated with acquiring a blood sample and administering a blood test or analysis that were charged to, paid by, or expected to be paid by, the law enforcement agency that requested the test. The bill does not require a person to pay for an alternative test if the person chose to have an alternative test administered.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

17 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 22 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (17)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. May 23, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. May 4, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Apr 27, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs.

  5. Apr 27, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 27, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Kedzie, Leibham, Galloway, Wirch and Darling;Cosponsored by Representatives Jacque, Farrow, Petersen, Kooyenga, Rivard, Spanbauer, Steineke, Brooks, Bies, A. Ott, Staskunas, Jorgensen, Endsley, Ziegelbauer, Mursau, Tranel and Knilans

  2. Apr 27, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs

  3. May 4, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 4, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. May 23, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate