Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 96

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

motor vehicle dealers.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, each manufacturer, importer, distributor, and dealer of

motor vehicles that wishes to sell motor vehicles in this state must be licensed by the

Department of Transportation (DOT). The manufacturer, importer, or distributor

may have its license revoked and may be liable for pecuniary losses and attorney fees

incurred by the dealer, if the manufacturer, importer, or distributor takes certain

actions with respect to a dealer that have been enumerated as violations.

This bill enumerates several additional actions of a manufacturer, importer, or

distributor with respect to a dealer as violations. These newly designated violations

are: 1) conditioning certain agreements or approvals on the dealer's entry into a

contract that allows the manufacturer, importer, or distributor to control the

disposition or use of the dealer's dealership facilities; 2) unreasonably conditioning

certain agreements or approvals on the dealer's improvement of the dealer's

dealership facilities at a substantial cost to the dealer; 3) unreasonably requiring a

dealer to maintain exclusive facilities for a particular line make of motor vehicles;

4) taking certain adverse actions against a dealer for charging a lawful service fee

to a retail customer; 5) taking certain adverse actions against a dealer because,

without the dealer's knowledge that the purchaser intended to export the motor

vehicle, a motor vehicle purchaser exported a motor vehicle; 6) with certain

exceptions, requiring a dealer to provide the manufacturer, importer, or distributor

with information regarding the dealer's retail customers; 7) transferring nonpublic

customer information obtained from a dealer to another dealer or otherwise using

nonpublic customer information obtained from a dealer for a nonpermitted use; and

8) failing to properly indemnify a dealer.

Under current law, a manufacturer, importer, or distributor must reasonably

compensate a dealer that performs certain motor vehicle service work for the

manufacturer, importer, or distributor. Covered service work is work to rectify

product defects or other defects covered by the warranty provided by the

manufacturer, importer, or distributor, certain motor vehicle delivery or preparation

obligations, and any other work approved by the manufacturer, importer, or

distributor. The manufacturer, importer, or distributor must compensate the dealer,

for service, at the effective labor rate charged to all customers and, for parts,

generally at not less than the amount the dealer charges other retail service

customers for the parts. To be eligible for compensation, a dealer must notify the

manufacturer, importer, or distributor of the amount that the dealer charges other

retail service customers for parts. The manufacturer, importer, or distributor may

require the dealer to provide documentary substantiation of the claimed amount the

dealer charges for parts.

This bill requires a manufacturer, importer, or distributor to compensate a

dealer based on the dealer's "effective nonwarranty labor rate" and "average

percentage markup over dealer cost for parts." To be eligible for compensation, a

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Cowles (R) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Kapanke (R) , Leibham (R) , Olsen (R) , Schultz (R) , T. Cullen (D) , Wanggaard (R) , Wirch (D)

22 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Barca (D) , Bernier (R) , Brooks (R) , Clark (D) , Endsley (R) , Holperin (D) , Kestell (R) , Klenke (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Petersen (R) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Steinbrink (D) , T. Larson (R) , Vruwink (D) , Weininger (R) , Williams (R) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation and Elections

Passed 5–0 Oct 13, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 85, Noes 7

Passed 85–7 Oct 25, 2011 official source full page

Aye · 85

Not voting · 4

Full history

  1. May 19, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Leibham, Carpenter, Cowles, T. Cullen, Erpenbach, Hansen, Olsen, Schultz, Wanggaard, Kapanke and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Barca, Bernier, Brooks, Clark, Endsley, Kestell, Klenke, T. Larson, Mursau, A. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Ripp, Spanbauer, Steinbrink, Vruwink, Weininger, Williams, Zepnick and Murtha

  2. May 19, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  3. Jun 3, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 22, 2011 · Senate

    Senator Holperin added as a coauthor

  5. Aug 23, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 13, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 13, 2011 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation and Elections

  8. Oct 13, 2011 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Oct 13, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Oct 13, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-20-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Oct 20, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 20, 2011 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  14. Oct 20, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Oct 20, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Oct 20, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1

  17. Oct 20, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 by committee on Rules

  21. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  22. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 85, Noes 7

  26. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Nov 9, 2011 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-9-2011

  29. Dec 6, 2011 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-5-2011

  30. Dec 8, 2011 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-7-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 91

  31. Dec 12, 2011 · Senate

    Published 12-20-2011