Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
veto power of county executive over appropriations (second consideration).
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Adopted, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Explanation of Proposal
This proposed constitutional amendment, to be given second consideration by
the 2011 legislature for submittal to the voters in April 2011, was first considered by
the
2009
legislature in 2009 Senate Joint Resolution
11
, which became
2009
Enrolled Joint Resolution
27
.
The proposed constitutional amendment provides that, in approving an
appropriation in part, the chief executive of a county may not create a new word by
rejecting individual letters in the words of the resolution or ordinance and may not
create a new sentence by combining parts of two or more sentences of the resolution
or ordinance. Currently, in exercising the partial veto power, the chief executive of
a county may approve appropriations contained in resolutions or ordinances in whole
or part without restriction.
Procedure for second ConsideratioN
When a proposed constitutional amendment is before the legislature on second
consideration, any change in the text approved by the preceding legislature causes
the proposed constitutional amendment to revert to first consideration status so that
second consideration approval would have to be given by the next legislature before
the proposal may be submitted to the people for ratification [see joint rule 57 (2)].
If the legislature approves a proposed constitutional amendment on second
consideration, it must also set the date for submitting the proposed constitutional
amendment to the people for ratification and must determine the question or
questions to appear on the ballot.
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
Passed 5–0 Jul 6, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 16, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Carpenter, Moulton, Schultz, Risser and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Bies, Mursau, Nass, Pasch, Rivard, Roys, Sinicki, Spanbauer and Stone
- Mar 16, 2011 · Senate
Read and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
- May 24, 2011 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jun 28, 2011 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jul 6, 2011 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
- Jul 6, 2011 · Senate
Report adoption as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jul 6, 2011 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1