Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SJR 16

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

veto power of county executive over appropriations (second consideration).

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Adopted, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Explanation of Proposal

This proposed constitutional amendment, to be given second consideration by

the 2011 legislature for submittal to the voters in April 2011, was first considered by

the

2009

legislature in 2009 Senate Joint Resolution

11

, which became

2009

Enrolled Joint Resolution

27

.

The proposed constitutional amendment provides that, in approving an

appropriation in part, the chief executive of a county may not create a new word by

rejecting individual letters in the words of the resolution or ordinance and may not

create a new sentence by combining parts of two or more sentences of the resolution

or ordinance. Currently, in exercising the partial veto power, the chief executive of

a county may approve appropriations contained in resolutions or ordinances in whole

or part without restriction.

Procedure for second ConsideratioN

When a proposed constitutional amendment is before the legislature on second

consideration, any change in the text approved by the preceding legislature causes

the proposed constitutional amendment to revert to first consideration status so that

second consideration approval would have to be given by the next legislature before

the proposal may be submitted to the people for ratification [see joint rule 57 (2)].

If the legislature approves a proposed constitutional amendment on second

consideration, it must also set the date for submitting the proposed constitutional

amendment to the people for ratification and must determine the question or

questions to appear on the ballot.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Moulton (R) , Risser (D) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D)

9 cosponsors

Bies (R) , Mursau (R) , Nass (R) , Pasch (D) , Rivard (R) , Roys (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Stone (R)

Votes

Senate: Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

Passed 5–0 Jul 6, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 16, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Carpenter, Moulton, Schultz, Risser and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Bies, Mursau, Nass, Pasch, Rivard, Roys, Sinicki, Spanbauer and Stone

  2. Mar 16, 2011 · Senate

    Read and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. May 24, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jun 28, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Jul 6, 2011 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  6. Jul 6, 2011 · Senate

    Report adoption as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Jul 6, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1