Senate Joint Resolution 48
Creating fiscal year allowable revenues for the state and local governmental units, returning excess revenue to the taxpayers, requiring electoral approval for certain taxing and spending decisions, and allowing local governmental units to exempt themselves from certain state mandates (first consideration)
Topics: Constitutional amendments: First consideration, Debt, Public, Municipality: Finance, Referendum, School: State aid, Taxation, Technical college
Stopped before the full Senate voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new proposal.
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 28, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Adopted, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to adopt pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This proposed constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2011 legislature on first consideration, provides that the state, or a school district, technical college district, or other local governmental unit that collects revenue, excluding a town that has less than $1,000,000 in allowable revenue, may not collect more in allowable revenue in any fiscal year than the amount of its allowable revenue in the previous fiscal year, increased by the lesser of the average percentage increase for the three most recent years available in the consumer price index for Milwaukee-Racine or the average percentage increase in state personal income for the three most recent years available, plus:
1. For the state, the estimated percentage increase, if any, from the previous year in state population.
Read the full summary Show less
2. For school districts, the annual percentage increase, if any, in student enrollment, averaged over the previous three years.
3. For technical college districts and all other local governmental units, the percentage increase, if any, from the previous year in taxable property value attributable to new construction, less the value of any taxable property removed or demolished in that district or governmental unit.
Under the proposed constitutional amendment, revenues collected in excess of allowable revenue are returned to taxpayers in the next fiscal year or, in the case of the state, deposited into a budget stabilization fund. The legislature may spend from the budget stabilization fund only to provide tax relief, for certain emergency events, or in any fiscal year in which the amount of allowable revenue is greater than the amount of collected revenue. The state or any local governmental unit may increase its allowable revenue, incur debt service by an amount that exceeds seven percent of allowable revenue, or exclude any tax, fee, or charge from allowable revenue only with the approval of the electorate at a referendum.
Under the proposed constitutional amendment, a local governmental unit may exempt itself from any new mandate imposed by the state that is not fully funded by the state or from any mandate for which the state reduces the percentage of the costs the state pays for the mandate.
A proposed constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Republicans.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 4 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Joe Leibham · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (1)
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this proposal.
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 5, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the proposal died with it.
-
Mar 5, 2012
The committee voted to recommend adopting it, 3 to 2.
-
Feb 28, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 28, 2011
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.
-
Oct 28, 2011
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 28, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lasee, Grothman and Leibham;Cosponsored by Representative Jacque
- Oct 28, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
- Feb 28, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote