Bills · Jan 2011 Special Session
regulation of telecommunications utilities and alternative telecommunications utilities; telecommunications provider of last-resort obligations; telecommunications intrastate switched access rates; interconnected voice over Internet protocol service; and use of transmission equipment and property by video service providers.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
The bill does all of the following: 1) makes changes to the authority of the Public
Service Commission (PSC) over telecommunications utilities; 2) imposes
requirements on certain intrastate switched access rates; 3) eliminates mandatory
telecommunications tariffs except for intrastate switched access service; 4) specifies
the PSC's authority over interconnected voice over Internet protocol (interconnected
VOIP) service; 5) makes changes to the PSC's authority for ensuring universal access
to telecommunications service; 6) imposes requirements regarding the availability
of basic voice service; 7) makes changes to requirements for the use of another
person's transmission equipment and property by public utilities and
telecommunications providers; and 8) makes other changes to telecommunications
regulation.
Telecommunications utility regulation
Under current law, with certain exceptions, the PSC regulates a
telecommunications provider that provides basic local exchange service as either a
telecommunications utility (TU) or an alternative telecommunications utility (ATU).
In general, the PSC has certified as TUs those telecommunications providers that
are incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) under federal law, which are
telecommunications providers that resulted from the breakup of the Bell System
pursuant to a federal antitrust action. In general, the PSC has certified as ATUs
those telecommunications providers that are competitive local exchange carriers
(CLECs) under federal law, which are telecommunications providers that compete
with ILECs to provide basic local exchange service.
Under current law, TUs are subject to varying degrees of regulation by the PSC,
depending on certain factors, such as whether the TU has elected price regulation,
under which the PSC regulates the rates charged by a TU, but not the TU's rate of
return. The degree of PSC regulation also depends on whether a TU is a cooperative
association, or whether the TU is a "small TU," which is a TU that had fewer than
50,000 access lines in this state on January 1, 1984. With certain exceptions, current
law exempts an ATU from PSC regulation, except that, if certain conditions are
satisfied, the PSC may impose on an ATU a requirement that otherwise applies to
a TU or other public utility. In addition, ATUs, like certain other persons who provide
active retail voice communications service, must collect from customers and remit to
the PSC a monthly police and fire protection fee that is used for shared revenue
payments.
ATUs.
Under this bill, ATUs are subject to the intrastate switched access rate,
tariff, and interconnected VOIP requirements described below, and to the monthly
police and fire protection fee described above. In addition, the bill limits the
additional requirements that the PSC may impose on an ATU. Under the bill, the
PSC may impose requirements that relate only to the following: 1) submission of
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Committee on Assembly Organization , Representative Honadel , Senator Zipperer , by request of Governor Scott Walker
4 cosponsors
Harsdorf, Cowles, Galloway, Grothman, Hopper, Kapanke, Leibham, Moulton, Olsen, Schultz, Taylor, Wanggaard and Vukmir , Honadel (R) , Zepnick, Bernier, Brooks, Danou, Endsley, Farrow, Fields, Jacque, Klenke, Knilans, Knudson, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Murtha, A. Ott, Petryk, Rivard, Severson, Stone, Strachota, Tranel, Vos, Weininger and Young , Zipperer (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 6, Noes 5
Passed 6–5 May 9, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by committee on Assembly Organization, by request of Governor Scott Walker, Representative Honadel, and Senator Zipperer
- Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities
- Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Honadel added as a coauthor
- Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly
Senator Zipperer added as a cosponsor
- Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly
Representatives Zepnick, Bernier, Brooks, Danou, Endsley, Farrow, Fields, Jacque, Klenke, Knilans, Knudson, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Murtha, A. Ott, Petryk, Rivard, Severson, Stone, Strachota, Tranel, Vos, Weininger and Young added as coauthors
- Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly
Senators Harsdorf, Cowles, Galloway, Grothman, Hopper, Kapanke, Leibham, Moulton, Olsen, Schultz, Taylor, Wanggaard and Vukmir added as a cosponsors
- May 3, 2011 · Assembly
LRB correction
- May 3, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 3, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 4, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Zepnick, Staskunas and Hulsey
- May 4, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Zepnick, Staskunas and Hulsey
- May 4, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Zepnick, Staskunas and Hulsey
- May 4, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representatives Zepnick and Hulsey
- May 4, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representatives Zepnick and Hulsey
- May 4, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Zepnick and Hulsey
- May 5, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 9, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 6, Noes 5
- May 9, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to Calendar 5-11-2011 pursuant to Assembly Rule 93
- May 11, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 11, 2011 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Sep 28, 2011 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1