Skip to content

Bills · Jan 2011 Special Session

AB 14

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

regulation of telecommunications utilities and alternative telecommunications utilities; telecommunications provider of last-resort obligations; telecommunications intrastate switched access rates; interconnected voice over Internet protocol service; and use of transmission equipment and property by video service providers.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

The bill does all of the following: 1) makes changes to the authority of the Public

Service Commission (PSC) over telecommunications utilities; 2) imposes

requirements on certain intrastate switched access rates; 3) eliminates mandatory

telecommunications tariffs except for intrastate switched access service; 4) specifies

the PSC's authority over interconnected voice over Internet protocol (interconnected

VOIP) service; 5) makes changes to the PSC's authority for ensuring universal access

to telecommunications service; 6) imposes requirements regarding the availability

of basic voice service; 7) makes changes to requirements for the use of another

person's transmission equipment and property by public utilities and

telecommunications providers; and 8) makes other changes to telecommunications

regulation.

Telecommunications utility regulation

Under current law, with certain exceptions, the PSC regulates a

telecommunications provider that provides basic local exchange service as either a

telecommunications utility (TU) or an alternative telecommunications utility (ATU).

In general, the PSC has certified as TUs those telecommunications providers that

are incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) under federal law, which are

telecommunications providers that resulted from the breakup of the Bell System

pursuant to a federal antitrust action. In general, the PSC has certified as ATUs

those telecommunications providers that are competitive local exchange carriers

(CLECs) under federal law, which are telecommunications providers that compete

with ILECs to provide basic local exchange service.

Under current law, TUs are subject to varying degrees of regulation by the PSC,

depending on certain factors, such as whether the TU has elected price regulation,

under which the PSC regulates the rates charged by a TU, but not the TU's rate of

return. The degree of PSC regulation also depends on whether a TU is a cooperative

association, or whether the TU is a "small TU," which is a TU that had fewer than

50,000 access lines in this state on January 1, 1984. With certain exceptions, current

law exempts an ATU from PSC regulation, except that, if certain conditions are

satisfied, the PSC may impose on an ATU a requirement that otherwise applies to

a TU or other public utility. In addition, ATUs, like certain other persons who provide

active retail voice communications service, must collect from customers and remit to

the PSC a monthly police and fire protection fee that is used for shared revenue

payments.

ATUs.

Under this bill, ATUs are subject to the intrastate switched access rate,

tariff, and interconnected VOIP requirements described below, and to the monthly

police and fire protection fee described above. In addition, the bill limits the

additional requirements that the PSC may impose on an ATU. Under the bill, the

PSC may impose requirements that relate only to the following: 1) submission of

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Committee on Assembly Organization , Representative Honadel , Senator Zipperer , by request of Governor Scott Walker

4 cosponsors

Harsdorf, Cowles, Galloway, Grothman, Hopper, Kapanke, Leibham, Moulton, Olsen, Schultz, Taylor, Wanggaard and Vukmir , Honadel (R) , Zepnick, Bernier, Brooks, Danou, Endsley, Farrow, Fields, Jacque, Klenke, Knilans, Knudson, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Murtha, A. Ott, Petryk, Rivard, Severson, Stone, Strachota, Tranel, Vos, Weininger and Young , Zipperer (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 6, Noes 5

Passed 6–5 May 9, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by committee on Assembly Organization, by request of Governor Scott Walker, Representative Honadel, and Senator Zipperer

  2. Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Honadel added as a coauthor

  4. Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Senator Zipperer added as a cosponsor

  5. Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Representatives Zepnick, Bernier, Brooks, Danou, Endsley, Farrow, Fields, Jacque, Klenke, Knilans, Knudson, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Murtha, A. Ott, Petryk, Rivard, Severson, Stone, Strachota, Tranel, Vos, Weininger and Young added as coauthors

  6. Apr 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Senators Harsdorf, Cowles, Galloway, Grothman, Hopper, Kapanke, Leibham, Moulton, Olsen, Schultz, Taylor, Wanggaard and Vukmir added as a cosponsors

  7. May 3, 2011 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  8. May 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. May 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  10. May 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Zepnick, Staskunas and Hulsey

  11. May 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Zepnick, Staskunas and Hulsey

  12. May 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Zepnick, Staskunas and Hulsey

  13. May 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representatives Zepnick and Hulsey

  14. May 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representatives Zepnick and Hulsey

  15. May 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Zepnick and Hulsey

  16. May 5, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  17. May 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 6, Noes 5

  18. May 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to Calendar 5-11-2011 pursuant to Assembly Rule 93

  19. May 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  20. May 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  21. Sep 28, 2011 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1