Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 144

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: equally divided determinations of the Wisconsin Supreme Court on matters of judicial discipline or permanent disability.

Court — Commissioner Judge Jury Supreme court Swanson, robert s

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Judicial Commission (commission) must investigate

any possible misconduct or permanent disability of a judge or circuit or supplemental

court commissioner. If, after the investigation, the commission finds probable cause

that the judge or court commissioner has engaged in misconduct or has a permanent

disability, the commission must file a petition with the Wisconsin Supreme Court

(supreme court) and prosecute the case against the judge or court commissioner. The

case is heard either by a panel of judges or, when requested by the commission, by

a jury. Also under current law, the supreme court must review the findings of fact,

conclusions of law, and recommendations made by the panel of judges and determine

appropriate discipline of the judge or court commissioner in cases of misconduct and

appropriate action in cases of permanent disability.

This bill provides that, in cases where the supreme court is equally divided on

the question of appropriate discipline or action, the findings of fact, conclusions of

law, and recommendations of the panel of judges are binding on the disciplined or

disabled judge or court commissioner. The bill also clarifies that, in those cases of

discipline or permanent disability that are heard by a jury, the supreme court must

review the jury verdict and recommendations of the presiding judge. If the supreme

court is equally divided on the question of appropriate discipline or action in a case

heard by a jury, the jury verdict and recommendations of the presiding judge are

binding on the disciplined or disabled judge or court commissioner.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Billings (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Hebl (D) , Mason (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pasch (D) , Richards (D) , Wachs (D) , Wright (D) , Zepnick (D)

1 cosponsors

Lehman (D)

Full history

  1. Apr 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Richards, Pasch, Wachs, Zepnick, Mason, Billings, Berceau, C. Taylor, Wright, Ohnstad and Bernard Schaber; cosponsored by Senator Lehman

  2. Apr 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Jun 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Judiciary and referred to committee on Government Operations and State Licensing pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  4. Oct 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Government Operations and State Licensing and referred to committee on State Affairs and Government Operations pursuant to Assembly Resolution 19

  5. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1