Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 157

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: motor vehicle registration by the Department of Transportation, historic military vehicles, and Kei class vehicles. (FE)

Military property Motor vehicle — Taxation or registration Transportation, department of — Vehicles

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law provides for a special category of motor vehicle registration for

"special interest vehicles," commonly known as "collector" vehicles. A vehicle may

be eligible for registration as a collector vehicle if the vehicle: 1) is at least 20 years

old, has not been altered or modified from its original manufacturer's specifications,

and is being preserved for its historic interest, or 2) is, with an exception, at least 25

years old and is a specific type of former military vehicle, such as a Pinzgauer or

Kaiser Jeep. The Department of Transportation (DOT) issues distinctive

registration plates, commonly known as collector plates, for vehicles registered as

collector vehicles. A collector vehicle may be reregistered for no additional fee.

Collector vehicles are subject to minimal operating restrictions, most notably that

they generally cannot be operated on the highways during the month of January.

Another special registration category recognized under current law allows a

former military vehicle to be registered as a historic military vehicle if the vehicle

was manufactured for use in any country's military forces, is maintained to

accurately represent its military design and markings, and either is a domestic

vehicle or is imported and at least 25 years old. DOT issues special plates for these

vehicles identifying them as historic military vehicles. Historic military vehicles are

subject to significant operating restrictions and may be used only for special

occasions such as display and parade purposes, including traveling to and from such

events, and for necessary testing, maintenance, and storage purposes.

Also under current law, DOT must refuse registration of a vehicle that is

originally designed and manufactured for off-highway operation unless the vehicle

meets the provisions of a certain section of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle

Safety Act of 1966, as amended. However, this prohibition against registration does

not apply to a former military vehicle being registered under the special registration

categories for collector vehicles or historic military vehicles.

This bill modifies this ground for refusing vehicle registration. Under the bill,

DOT must refuse registration of a vehicle that was manufactured after 1969 and does

not meet manufacturer or importer certification label requirements as specified in

federal regulations or that is a Kei class vehicle. However, this prohibition against

registration does not apply to former military vehicles, regardless of the registration

category for which the vehicle is registered. The bill defines a "former military

vehicle" as a vehicle, including a trailer but excluding a tracked vehicle, that was

manufactured for use in any country's military forces. This prohibition against

registration also does not apply to collector vehicles being registered under the

special registration category for collector vehicles. As under current law, this

prohibition against registration also does not apply to a former military vehicle being

registered under the special registration categories for collector vehicles or historic

military vehicles.

The bill also modifies an eligibility requirement for registering a collector

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bewley (D) , Brooks (R) , Czaja (R) , Honadel (R) , Jacque (R) , Kahl (D) , Kestell (R) , Krug (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Schraa (R) , Strachota (R) , Stroebel (R) , Swearingen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Weatherston (R)

9 cosponsors

Erpenbach (D) , Grothman (R) , Gudex (R) , Lehman (D) , Moulton (R) , Petrowski (R) , Schultz (R) , Tiffany (R) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

Passed 13–0 Sep 5, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kestell, Schraa, Jacque, Weatherston, Brooks, Thiesfeldt, Strachota, Krug, Czaja, Honadel, Mursau, Murtha, LeMahieu, Bewley, Murphy, Kahl, Stroebel, Swearingen and Ohnstad; cosponsored by Senators Grothman, Erpenbach, Petrowski, Tiffany, Gudex, Schultz, Moulton, Lehman and Wirch

  2. Apr 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Apr 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Ohnstad withdrawn as a coauthor

  6. Aug 27, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  8. Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  9. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1