Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 164

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: local ordinances regarding possession of marijuana or a synthetic cannabinoid. (FE)

Drugs — Criminal acts and law enforcement Ordinance

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a city, village, or town (local governmental unit) or a county

may enact and enforce an ordinance prohibiting the possession of 25 grams or less

of marijuana or the possession of a synthetic cannabinoid. A person who is charged

with possession of more than 25 grams of marijuana or who is charged with

possession of any amount of marijuana or a synthetic cannabinoid following a

conviction for the possession of a controlled substance generally may not be

prosecuted under the ordinance.

This bill allows a local governmental unit or a county to enact and enforce an

ordinance to prohibit the possession of any amount of marijuana and to prosecute a

person for a second or subsequent offense of possessing marijuana or a synthetic

cannabinoid. The local governmental unit, however, may enforce the prohibition

against possessing marijuana in a case in which the person is alleged to possess more

than 25 grams of marijuana or may prosecute a second or subsequent offense only

if the state complaint against the person is dismissed or if the district attorney

declines to prosecute the case. In turn, a county may enforce the prohibition against

possessing marijuana in a case in which the person is alleged to possess more than

25 grams of marijuana or may prosecute a second or subsequent offense only if, after

the state dismisses the complaint or declines to prosecute the case, the local

governmental unit with jurisdiction also dismisses the complaint, declines to

prosecute the case, or lacks an ordinance under which the complaint could be

prosecuted.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Honadel (R) , Jacque (R) , Nass (R) , T. Larson (R) , Thiesfeldt (R)

3 cosponsors

Gudex (R) , Leibham (R) , Mason (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 3

Passed 5–3 Jun 4, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Nass, Jacque, T. Larson and Honadel; cosponsored by Senators Gudex and Leibham

  2. Apr 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. May 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jun 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jun 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  7. Jun 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  8. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Barnes

  9. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Representative Mason added as a coauthor

  10. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  11. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1