Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 171

Jurisdiction in matters relating to domestic abuse restraining orders and injunctions, child abuse restraining orders and injunctions, and harassment restraining orders and injunctions. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Jan 14, 2014, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 25, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 14, 2014

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a court may entertain a civil action only when the court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action and over the persons who are served in the action. Jurisdiction is conferred by the U.S. Constitution, the Wisconsin Constitution, and by statute.

This bill clarifies when a court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction in certain actions for restraining orders or injunctions in cases of domestic abuse, child abuse, or harassment. Under the bill, a court has jurisdiction of the subject matter to entertain those actions regardless of whether the alleged abuse or harassment occurred within the state. Under the bill, a court has personal jurisdiction over a person who is in another state if any of the following applies:

Read the full summary

1. The abuse or harassment alleged in the action could have an effect in Wisconsin.

2. The petitioner or alleged child victim resides or is living temporarily in Wisconsin.

3. Jurisdiction is otherwise permissible under the constitution of the United States or of the state of Wisconsin.

If a court has personal jurisdiction on any of the listed grounds and a respondent has been served but does not appear or file a response or motion asserting the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction, the bill requires the court to hear the action.

Who's behind it

29 lawmakers are its ⁠. 21 are Republicans and 8 are Democrats.

14 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 43 names

Authors (29)

Signed on in support (14)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 0 · Dec 20, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 0 · Dec 20, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 29, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jan 15, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  4. Jan 15, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  5. Jan 14, 2014

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Jan 14, 2014

    The Assembly passed it.

  7. Jan 14, 2014

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Jan 10, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Dec 20, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. Dec 20, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.

  11. Nov 7, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Apr 25, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  13. Apr 25, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Loudenbeck, Ballweg, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bies, Billings, Born, Brooks, Endsley, Jacque, Hebl, Kerkman, Kleefisch, T. Larson, Marklein, Murphy, Mursau, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Pridemore, Richards, Ripp, Schraa, Steineke, Strachota, Tittl, Wright, Hintz and Swearingen; cosponsored by Senators Harsdorf, Kedzie, Carpenter, Gudex, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, Lehman, Moulton, Olsen, Petrowski, Risser and Shilling

  2. Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Loudenbeck

  4. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Dec 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  7. Dec 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  8. Dec 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  9. Jan 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-14-2014 by Committee on Rules

  10. Jan 10, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Jan 10, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Representative Kolste added as a coauthor

  18. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Jan 15, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Jan 15, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  21. Jan 15, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Jan 29, 2014 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  23. Apr 8, 2014 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote