Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: the prohibition on telephone solicitations to residential customers, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Air pollution Federal trade commission Telephone
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law regulates "telephone solicitation," which is defined as the
unsolicited initiation of a telephone conversation or text message for the purpose of
encouraging the recipient of the telephone call or text message to purchase property,
goods, or services. Current law generally prohibits a telephone solicitor, or employee
or contractor of a telephone solicitor, from making a telephone solicitation to a
residential customer if the customer's landline or wireless telephone number is
included in a nonsolicitation directory maintained by the Department of Agriculture,
Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP), which lists residential customers who do
not wish to receive telephone solicitations. Current law exempts the following from
the prohibition: 1) telephone solicitations made by nonprofit organizations; 2)
telephone solicitations made in response to a recipient's request; and 3) telephone
solicitations made to current clients of the person selling property, goods, or services
that are the reason for the solicitation. Current law requires DATCP to promulgate
rules requiring that telephone solicitors register with DATCP and pay initial
registration and annual registration renewal fees to DATCP, which DATCP must use
for establishing and maintaining the nonsolicitation directory, as well as for
consumer protection, information, and education. Current law prohibits a telephone
solicitor who is not registered from requiring that employees or contractors make
telephone solicitations in this state. Current law also provides that if a residential
customer does not biennially renew his or her listing in the nonsolicitation directory,
DATCP must eliminate the customer's telephone number from the directory.
Federal law also regulates telephone solicitations by authorizing the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) to prohibit deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts or
practices. Under that authority, the FTC has promulgated a regulation that, with
certain exceptions, prohibits a telemarketer from initiating a telephone call
encouraging the purchase of goods or services if the recipient's telephone number is
on a national "do-not-call" registry maintained by the FTC that consists of the
telephone numbers of persons who do not wish to receive such calls. One of the
exceptions applies to telemarketing calls to businesses. Federal law requires
telemarketers to pay annual fees in order to access the registry. The FTC allows a
person to add a landline or wireless telephone number to the registry through a
toll-free number or over the Internet. Under federal law, inclusion of a telephone
number in the registry is permanent and a person is not required to periodically
renew the inclusion. However, a person may remove a telephone number from the
registry and the FTC must periodically review the registry and remove telephone
numbers that have been disconnected or reassigned to another person.
This bill eliminates the state's nonsolicitation directory and instead prohibits
a telephone solicitor, or employee or contractor of a telephone solicitor, from making
a telephone solicitation, as defined under current state law, to a landline or wireless
telephone number that is included on a "state do-not-call registry," which the bill
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Sep 5, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Ripp, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Czaja, Endsley, Hintz, Jacque, Jagler, T. Larson, Marklein, Murphy, Mursau, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Sinicki, Spiros, Strachota, Tittl, Tranel and Ballweg; cosponsored by Senators Tiffany, Cowles, Gudex, Olsen and Petrowski
- Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection
- May 17, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 23, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Aug 26, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Pope
- Aug 26, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Pope
- Aug 27, 2013 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1