Assembly Bill 172
The prohibition on telephone solicitations to residential customers, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Apr 25, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law regulates "telephone solicitation," which is defined as the unsolicited initiation of a telephone conversation or text message for the purpose of encouraging the recipient of the telephone call or text message to purchase property, goods, or services. Current law generally prohibits a telephone solicitor, or employee or contractor of a telephone solicitor, from making a telephone solicitation to a residential customer if the customer's landline or wireless telephone number is included in a nonsolicitation directory maintained by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP), which lists residential customers who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations. Current law exempts the following from the prohibition: 1) telephone solicitations made by nonprofit organizations; 2) telephone solicitations made in response to a recipient's request; and 3) telephone solicitations made to current clients of the person selling property, goods, or services that are the reason for the solicitation. Current law requires DATCP to promulgate rules requiring that telephone solicitors register with DATCP and pay initial registration and annual registration renewal fees to DATCP, which DATCP must use for establishing and maintaining the nonsolicitation directory, as well as for consumer protection, information, and education. Current law prohibits a telephone solicitor who is not registered from requiring that employees or contractors make telephone solicitations in this state. Current law also provides that if a residential customer does not biennially renew his or her listing in the nonsolicitation directory, DATCP must eliminate the customer's telephone number from the directory.
Federal law also regulates telephone solicitations by authorizing the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to prohibit deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts or practices. Under that authority, the FTC has promulgated a regulation that, with certain exceptions, prohibits a telemarketer from initiating a telephone call encouraging the purchase of goods or services if the recipient's telephone number is on a national "do-not-call" registry maintained by the FTC that consists of the telephone numbers of persons who do not wish to receive such calls. One of the exceptions applies to telemarketing calls to businesses. Federal law requires telemarketers to pay annual fees in order to access the registry. The FTC allows a person to add a landline or wireless telephone number to the registry through a toll-free number or over the Internet. Under federal law, inclusion of a telephone number in the registry is permanent and a person is not required to periodically renew the inclusion. However, a person may remove a telephone number from the registry and the FTC must periodically review the registry and remove telephone numbers that have been disconnected or reassigned to another person.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill eliminates the state's nonsolicitation directory and instead prohibits a telephone solicitor, or employee or contractor of a telephone solicitor, from making a telephone solicitation, as defined under current state law, to a landline or wireless telephone number that is included on a "state do-not-call registry," which the bill defines as the portion of the national do-not-call registry that consists of telephone numbers with Wisconsin area codes. The bill allows DATCP to cooperate with the FTC to add telephone numbers that were in the state's nonsolicitation directory to the national do-not-call registry. The bill's prohibition is subject to the same exemptions as the prohibition under current state law. The bill requires DATCP to publicize the procedures for a residential customer to add a telephone number to the national do-not-call registry.
The bill also provides that the initial registration and annual registration renewal fees that are paid by telephone solicitors must be used for DATCP's administration and enforcement of the requirements applicable to telephone solicitors, as well as for consumer protection, information, and education. The bill allows DATCP to base the amount of a fee that a telephone solicitor must pay on a methodology established by rule, in addition to basing the amount on the number of telephone lines used by the telephone solicitor to make solicitations, which is the basis allowed under current law. In addition, the bill requires that DATCP's rules require a telephone solicitor to provide DATCP with proof that the telephone solicitor has complied with federal law in obtaining copies or updated versions of the state do-not-call registry. The proof must be provided upon initial registration and annual renewal, as well as any other time upon DATCP's request. Finally, the bill prohibits a telephone solicitor from using or possessing a copy or updated version of the state do-not-call registry that the telephone solicitor has obtained in violation of federal law.
Who's behind it
21 lawmakers are its . 18 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.
5 more lawmakers .
See all 26 names Hide the names
Authors (21)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Endsley · Republican, Assembly
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- John Jagler · Republican, Senate
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (5)
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Richard Gudex · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 0 · Sep 5, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 8, 2014
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Sep 5, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Sep 5, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.
-
Jul 23, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 17, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 25, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.
-
Apr 25, 2013
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Ripp, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Czaja, Endsley, Hintz, Jacque, Jagler, T. Larson, Marklein, Murphy, Mursau, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Sinicki, Spiros, Strachota, Tittl, Tranel and Ballweg; cosponsored by Senators Tiffany, Cowles, Gudex, Olsen and Petrowski
- Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection
- May 17, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 23, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Aug 26, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Pope
- Aug 26, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Pope
- Aug 27, 2013 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote