Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 175

Training standards for law enforcement officers regarding domestic abuse incidents and complaints, and law enforcement reports following a domestic abuse incident. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Jun 13, 2013, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 25, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jun 13, 2013

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law generally requires a law enforcement officer to arrest a person if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person has committed domestic abuse and that the person's actions constitute the commission of a crime. If the law enforcement officer does not arrest a person under these conditions, the officer must prepare a written report stating why the person was not arrested. The report must be sent to the district attorney's office and the district attorney must review the report to determine whether to charge the person. The district attorney must submit a report to the Department of Justice (DOJ) that lists the number of such arrests and the number of prosecutions and convictions resulting from the arrests. Under this bill, if the law enforcement officer does not make an arrest because he or she did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the person had committed domestic abuse or that the person's acts constituted the commission of a crime, the officer must also prepare a report that states why he or she lacked reasonable grounds to believe one of those factors. In addition, under this bill, the district attorney must include on the report to DOJ, the number of responses made by law enforcement to an incident involving domestic abuse that did not result in an arrest and the number of prosecutions and convictions of persons on those reports for a crime involving domestic abuse.

Under current law, a person must complete a preparatory program of law enforcement training that is approved by the law enforcement standards board before being appointed as a law enforcement officer. Any training program must include an adequate amount of training to enable the person to deal effectively with domestic abuse incidents. This bill requires the law enforcement standards board to establish standards for the training of law enforcement officers in handling domestic abuse incidents. The training must include the following: 1) the law enforcement officer's duty to protect the victim, to enforce all criminal laws in a domestic abuse incident, and to arrest the predominant aggressor if a crime has been committed; 2) the law enforcement officer's duty to inform the victim of shelters and services, give him or her notice of legal rights and remedies, explain how to file a petition for a domestic abuse or harassment injunction, and explain that he or she may contact a district attorney; and 3) the law enforcement officer's option to arrange transportation for the victim to go to the hospital or to a place of safety.

Read the full summary

Under current law, each district attorney's office must have written policies that encourage the prosecution of domestic abuse offenses. The policies must include a policy indicating that a decision not to prosecute a domestic abuse incident may not be based solely upon the absence of visible indications of injury, upon the victim's consent to any prosecution of the other person, or upon the relationship of the persons involved in the incident.

Who's behind it

21 lawmakers are its ⁠. 11 are Republicans and 10 are Democrats.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 32 names

Authors (21)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jun 3, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jun 3, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 12, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Jun 17, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs.

  4. Jun 14, 2013

    The Senate received it.

  5. Jun 13, 2013

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Jun 13, 2013

    The Assembly passed it.

  7. Jun 13, 2013

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Jun 11, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Jun 3, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. Jun 3, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  11. Jun 3, 2013

    “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. May 22, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. May 21, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. May 14, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Apr 25, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security.

  16. Apr 25, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Kerkman, Richards, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bernier, Bies, Billings, Brooks, Czaja, Genrich, Hebl, Hintz, Kaufert, Kleefisch, Kolste, Loudenbeck, A. Ott, Schraa, Sinicki and C. Taylor; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Gudex, Carpenter, Hansen, Harris, Jauch, Lehman, Olsen, Risser and Shilling

  2. Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security

  3. May 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 28, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Jacque

  7. May 30, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  9. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  10. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  11. Jun 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Jun 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Jun 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-13-2013 by Committee on Rules

  14. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  16. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  18. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  19. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Wright added as a coauthor

  20. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Jun 14, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Jun 17, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs

  23. Feb 12, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  24. Apr 8, 2014 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote