Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 176

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: temporary restraining orders and injunctions for domestic abuse, child abuse, individuals at risk, and harassment, confidential name change petitions, and ex parte orders with a judge substitution. (FE)

Children — Abuse and neglect Children — Protection and services Children and families, department of Court — Procedure Crime and criminals Judge Privacy Women

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law defines domestic abuse, for the purpose of issuing a domestic abuse

temporary restraining order (TRO) or injunction, as intentionally inflicting pain,

injury, or illness on another, impairing another's physical condition, sexual assault,

damage to another's property, or a threat to do any of those actions if the actor is

engaging in the action against another adult family or household member, an adult

who is under the actor's care, the actor's former spouse, a person with whom the actor

has or had a dating relationship, or an adult with whom the actor has a child in

common. This bill adds stalking, or a threat to stalk, to the actions that constitute

domestic abuse.

Under current law, when issuing a harassment TRO or injunction, the court

may order the respondent to cease or avoid the harassment of another person or to

avoid the petitioner's residence, any premises temporarily occupied by the petitioner,

or both. Under this bill, the court may order the respondent to avoid contacting or

causing any person other than a party's attorney or a law enforcement officer to

contact the petitioner without the petitioner's written consent.

Under current law, in an action involving the issuance of a child abuse TRO or

injunction, the court may exclude from the hearing all persons except the parties,

their attorneys, witnesses, child victim advocates, and certain others (essential

persons) and may deny access to persons who are not essential persons to any records

of the action. Under this bill, all persons who are not essential persons are excluded

and any records of the action are confidential and available only to essential persons.

In actions involving the issuance of a domestic abuse or harassment TRO or

injunction, current law provides for the confidentiality of the victim's addresses.

This bill provides for the confidentiality of the addresses of a victim in an action

involving the issuance of an individual-at-risk or a child abuse TRO or injunction.

Under current law, in general, a judge must hold a hearing on the issuance of

a domestic abuse, child abuse, individual-at-risk, or harassment injunction within

14 days of issuing a TRO. This bill specifies that a court may not extend the TRO in

lieu of ruling on the injunction.

This bill specifies that, in an action involving the issuance of a child abuse TRO

or injunction, the victim or the victim's parent, stepparent, or legal guardian does not

have to pay the compensation of the guardian ad litem. This bill also specifies that,

if a person seeks a new hearing of a determination, order, or ruling a court makes in

an action involving the issuance of a domestic abuse, child abuse, individual-at-risk,

or harassment TRO or injunction, the determination, order, or ruling made in the

original hearing remains in effect until the final determination, order, or ruling is

made in the new hearing. Finally, the bill specifies that, in the event that a new judge

substitutes for the original judge, any ex parte order, which includes a TRO, granted

by the original judge remains in effect and the new judge must hear any subsequent

motion to modify or vacate the order and any TRO issued by the original judge is

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Billings (D) , Born (R) , Brooks (R) , C. Taylor (D) , Czaja (R) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Jacque (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Kolste (D) , Loudenbeck (R) , Richards (D) , Schraa (R) , Sinicki (D) , Spiros (R)

12 cosponsors

Ellis (R) , Gudex (R) , Hansen (D) , Harris (D) , Jauch (D) , Lassa (D) , Lehman (D) , Olsen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Risser (D) , Shilling (D) , Wright (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Jun 3, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Sep 26, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Spiros, Richards, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bernier, Bies, Billings, Born, Brooks, Czaja, Hebl, Hintz, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kleefisch, Kolste, Loudenbeck, A. Ott, Schraa, Sinicki, C. Taylor and Ballweg; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Gudex, Hansen, Harris, Jauch, Lehman, Olsen, Risser and Shilling

  2. Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security

  3. May 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 28, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  8. Jun 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-13-2013 by Committee on Rules

  9. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  10. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  11. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Wright added as a coauthor

  12. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Jun 14, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Jun 17, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs

  17. Sep 5, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  18. Sep 26, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  19. Sep 26, 2013 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  20. Sep 26, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  21. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Senator Ellis added as a cosponsor

  22. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  28. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. Mar 24, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-24-2014

  31. Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014

  32. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 322

  33. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2014