Assembly Bill 176
Temporary restraining orders and injunctions for domestic abuse, child abuse, individuals at risk, and harassment, confidential name change petitions, and ex parte orders with a judge substitution. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 16, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Apr 25, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jun 13, 2013
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 18, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 322
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2014: “Published 4-17-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law defines domestic abuse, for the purpose of issuing a domestic abuse temporary restraining order (TRO) or injunction, as intentionally inflicting pain, injury, or illness on another, impairing another's physical condition, sexual assault, damage to another's property, or a threat to do any of those actions if the actor is engaging in the action against another adult family or household member, an adult who is under the actor's care, the actor's former spouse, a person with whom the actor has or had a dating relationship, or an adult with whom the actor has a child in common. This bill adds stalking, or a threat to stalk, to the actions that constitute domestic abuse.
Under current law, when issuing a harassment TRO or injunction, the court may order the respondent to cease or avoid the harassment of another person or to avoid the petitioner's residence, any premises temporarily occupied by the petitioner, or both. Under this bill, the court may order the respondent to avoid contacting or causing any person other than a party's attorney or a law enforcement officer to contact the petitioner without the petitioner's written consent.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, in an action involving the issuance of a child abuse TRO or injunction, the court may exclude from the hearing all persons except the parties, their attorneys, witnesses, child victim advocates, and certain others (essential persons) and may deny access to persons who are not essential persons to any records of the action. Under this bill, all persons who are not essential persons are excluded and any records of the action are confidential and available only to essential persons.
In actions involving the issuance of a domestic abuse or harassment TRO or injunction, current law provides for the confidentiality of the victim's addresses.
This bill provides for the confidentiality of the addresses of a victim in an action involving the issuance of an individual-at-risk or a child abuse TRO or injunction.
Under current law, in general, a judge must hold a hearing on the issuance of a domestic abuse, child abuse, individual-at-risk, or harassment injunction within 14 days of issuing a TRO. This bill specifies that a court may not extend the TRO in lieu of ruling on the injunction.
This bill specifies that, in an action involving the issuance of a child abuse TRO or injunction, the victim or the victim's parent, stepparent, or legal guardian does not have to pay the compensation of the guardian ad litem. This bill also specifies that, if a person seeks a new hearing of a determination, order, or ruling a court makes in an action involving the issuance of a domestic abuse, child abuse, individual-at-risk, or harassment TRO or injunction, the determination, order, or ruling made in the original hearing remains in effect until the final determination, order, or ruling is made in the new hearing. Finally, the bill specifies that, in the event that a new judge substitutes for the original judge, any ex parte order, which includes a TRO, granted by the original judge remains in effect and the new judge must hear any subsequent motion to modify or vacate the order and any TRO issued by the original judge is automatically extended until the new judge holds an injunction hearing.
Who's behind it
23 lawmakers are its . 14 are Republicans and 9 are Democrats.
12 more lawmakers .
See all 35 names Hide the names
Authors (23)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Penny Bernard Schaber · Democrat, Assembly
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Jill Billings · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Born · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Chris Taylor · Democrat, Assembly
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Debra Kolste · Democrat, Assembly
- Amy Loudenbeck · Republican, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (12)
- Michael Ellis · Republican, Senate
- Richard Gudex · Republican, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Nikiya Harris Dodd · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Jennifer Shilling · Democrat, Senate
- Mandy Wright · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 0 · Jun 3, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Sep 26, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 16, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 16, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 322.
-
Apr 15, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 18, 2014
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 18, 2014
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 14, 2014
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Sep 26, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Sep 5, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jun 17, 2013
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs.
-
Jun 14, 2013
The Senate received it.
-
Jun 13, 2013
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jun 13, 2013
The Assembly passed it.
-
Jun 3, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jun 3, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
May 21, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 21, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 25, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security.
-
Apr 25, 2013
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Spiros, Richards, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bernier, Bies, Billings, Born, Brooks, Czaja, Hebl, Hintz, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kleefisch, Kolste, Loudenbeck, A. Ott, Schraa, Sinicki, C. Taylor and Ballweg; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Gudex, Hansen, Harris, Jauch, Lehman, Olsen, Risser and Shilling
- Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security
- May 21, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 21, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 28, 2013 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Jun 11, 2013 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-13-2013 by Committee on Rules
- Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly
Representative Wright added as a coauthor
- Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 14, 2013 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jun 17, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs
- Sep 5, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Sep 26, 2013 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 26, 2013 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 26, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 14, 2014 · Senate
Senator Ellis added as a cosponsor
- Mar 14, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 24, 2014 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 3-24-2014
- Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014
- Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 322
- Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly
Published 4-17-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote