Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 176

Temporary restraining orders and injunctions for domestic abuse, child abuse, individuals at risk, and harassment, confidential name change petitions, and ex parte orders with a judge substitution. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 16, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 25, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jun 13, 2013

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 18, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 322

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2014: “Published 4-17-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law defines domestic abuse, for the purpose of issuing a domestic abuse temporary restraining order (TRO) or injunction, as intentionally inflicting pain, injury, or illness on another, impairing another's physical condition, sexual assault, damage to another's property, or a threat to do any of those actions if the actor is engaging in the action against another adult family or household member, an adult who is under the actor's care, the actor's former spouse, a person with whom the actor has or had a dating relationship, or an adult with whom the actor has a child in common. This bill adds stalking, or a threat to stalk, to the actions that constitute domestic abuse.

Under current law, when issuing a harassment TRO or injunction, the court may order the respondent to cease or avoid the harassment of another person or to avoid the petitioner's residence, any premises temporarily occupied by the petitioner, or both. Under this bill, the court may order the respondent to avoid contacting or causing any person other than a party's attorney or a law enforcement officer to contact the petitioner without the petitioner's written consent.

Read the full summary

Under current law, in an action involving the issuance of a child abuse TRO or injunction, the court may exclude from the hearing all persons except the parties, their attorneys, witnesses, child victim advocates, and certain others (essential persons) and may deny access to persons who are not essential persons to any records of the action. Under this bill, all persons who are not essential persons are excluded and any records of the action are confidential and available only to essential persons.

In actions involving the issuance of a domestic abuse or harassment TRO or injunction, current law provides for the confidentiality of the victim's addresses.

This bill provides for the confidentiality of the addresses of a victim in an action involving the issuance of an individual-at-risk or a child abuse TRO or injunction.

Under current law, in general, a judge must hold a hearing on the issuance of a domestic abuse, child abuse, individual-at-risk, or harassment injunction within 14 days of issuing a TRO. This bill specifies that a court may not extend the TRO in lieu of ruling on the injunction.

This bill specifies that, in an action involving the issuance of a child abuse TRO or injunction, the victim or the victim's parent, stepparent, or legal guardian does not have to pay the compensation of the guardian ad litem. This bill also specifies that, if a person seeks a new hearing of a determination, order, or ruling a court makes in an action involving the issuance of a domestic abuse, child abuse, individual-at-risk, or harassment TRO or injunction, the determination, order, or ruling made in the original hearing remains in effect until the final determination, order, or ruling is made in the new hearing. Finally, the bill specifies that, in the event that a new judge substitutes for the original judge, any ex parte order, which includes a TRO, granted by the original judge remains in effect and the new judge must hear any subsequent motion to modify or vacate the order and any TRO issued by the original judge is automatically extended until the new judge holds an injunction hearing.

Who's behind it

23 lawmakers are its ⁠. 14 are Republicans and 9 are Democrats.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 35 names

Authors (23)

Signed on in support (12)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Jun 3, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Sep 26, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 16, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 16, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 322.

  3. Apr 15, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 18, 2014

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  5. Mar 18, 2014

    The Senate passed it too.

  6. Mar 14, 2014

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  7. Sep 26, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  8. Sep 5, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Jun 17, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs.

  10. Jun 14, 2013

    The Senate received it.

  11. Jun 13, 2013

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Jun 13, 2013

    The Assembly passed it.

  13. Jun 3, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  14. Jun 3, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  15. May 21, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. May 21, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Apr 25, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security.

  18. Apr 25, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Spiros, Richards, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bernier, Bies, Billings, Born, Brooks, Czaja, Hebl, Hintz, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kleefisch, Kolste, Loudenbeck, A. Ott, Schraa, Sinicki, C. Taylor and Ballweg; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Gudex, Hansen, Harris, Jauch, Lehman, Olsen, Risser and Shilling

  2. Apr 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security

  3. May 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 28, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  8. Jun 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-13-2013 by Committee on Rules

  9. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Wright added as a coauthor

  14. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Jun 14, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Jun 17, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs

  17. Sep 5, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  18. Sep 26, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  19. Sep 26, 2013 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  20. Sep 26, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  21. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Senator Ellis added as a cosponsor

  22. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  28. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. Mar 24, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-24-2014

  31. Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014

  32. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 322

  33. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote