Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 192

The investigation of a child abuse report in which a person who is not a caregiver of the child is suspected of permitting, allowing, or encouraging the child to engage in prostitution. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 3, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, certain persons having reasonable cause to suspect that a child seen in the course of professional duties has been abused must report that suspected abuse to the sheriff or police department or to the county department of human services or social services or, in Milwaukee County, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or a child welfare agency under contract with DCF (collectively "agency"). Current law also permits any other person having reason to suspect that a child has been abused to make such a report.

Current law requires the sheriff or police department to refer to an agency all cases of child abuse reported to it in which a caregiver is suspected of the abuse or of facilitating or failing to take action to prevent the suspected abuse and all cases in which it cannot be determined who abused the child. Then, within 24 hours after receiving the referral, the agency must initiate a diligent investigation to determine if the child is in need of protection or services. Current law, however, permits, rather than requires, the sheriff or police department to refer to an agency a case in which a person who is not a caregiver of a child is suspected of the abuse of the child and permits, rather than requires, the agency to initiate a diligent investigation to determine if the child is in need of protection or services.

Read the full summary

This bill requires the sheriff or police department to refer to an agency, and the agency to investigate, a case of child abuse in which a person who is not a caregiver of the child is suspected of permitting, allowing, or encouraging the child to engage in prostitution.

Who's behind it

3 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 3 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (3)

  • Harris, Darling, Hansen, Carpenter, L. Taylor, Lehman and Lassa
  • Kleefisch and Jacque
  • Wright, Ballweg, A. Ott, Sargent, C. Taylor, Kaufert, Schraa, Bies, Ringhand, Genrich, Richards, Thiesfeldt, Mason, Kolste, LeMahieu, Petryk, Hebl, Tranel and Pope

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · May 24, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 12, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jun 3, 2013

    19 more representatives and 7 senators signed on in support.

  4. May 24, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  5. May 24, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  6. May 23, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. May 15, 2013

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  8. May 3, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  9. May 3, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Johnson, Goyke and Kessler

  2. May 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice

  3. May 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Representatives Kleefisch and Jacque added as coauthors

  4. May 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. May 24, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. May 24, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  8. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Representatives Wright, Ballweg, A. Ott, Sargent, C. Taylor, Kaufert, Schraa, Bies, Ringhand, Genrich, Richards, Thiesfeldt, Mason, Kolste, LeMahieu, Petryk, Hebl, Tranel and Pope added as coauthors

  9. Jun 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Senators Harris, Darling, Hansen, Carpenter, L. Taylor, Lehman and Lassa added as cosponsors

  10. Jun 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote