Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: restricting the use of drones and providing a penalty. (FE)
Aviation Bank — Deposit — Public Legislature — Criminal penalties, joint review committee on Police Privacy Search warrant
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill restricts the use of drones. The bill defines a drone as a powered, aerial
vehicle that does not carry a human operator, uses aerodynamic vehicle lift, and can
fly autonomously or be piloted remotely.
Under the bill, no law enforcement agency may use a drone that is equipped
with video or audio recording equipment to collect evidence or information in a
criminal investigation without first obtaining a search warrant. The bill allows a law
enforcement agency to use a drone without a search warrant if it is necessary to do
so for certain emergency purposes, including to locate an escaped prisoner, to aid in
a search and rescue mission, or to prevent imminent harm to a person or the
imminent destruction of evidence. Under the bill, evidence obtained by a drone in
violation of the law is not admissible in a criminal proceeding.
Under the bill, a person who sells, possesses, or uses a weaponized drone is
guilty of a Class H felony, and may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to six
years, or both. The bill prohibits a person, except a law enforcement officer who has
a search warrant or is acting for a permissible emergency purpose, from using a
drone that is equipped with video or audio recording equipment to photograph,
record, or otherwise observe another individual in a place where the individual has
a reasonable expectation of privacy. Anyone who does so is guilty of a Class A
misdemeanor, and may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to nine months, or
both.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to
result if the bill is enacted.
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , August (R) , Ballweg (R) , Berceau (D) , Born (R) , C. Taylor (D) , Craig (R) , Czaja (R) , Hebl (D) , Kessler (D) , Kestell (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Murphy (R) , Murtha (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Sanfelippo (R) , Shankland (D) , Spiros (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tittl (R) , Tranel (R)
Full history
- May 16, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives August, Kessler, Craig, C. Taylor, Ballweg, Berceau, Born, Czaja, Hebl, Kestell, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Murtha, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Pope, Sanfelippo, Shankland, Spiros, Thiesfeldt, Tittl and Tranel; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Erpenbach, Risser, Grothman, Hansen, Schultz and L. Taylor
- May 16, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations and State Licensing
- May 29, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 20, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative August
- Oct 17, 2013 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Government Operations and State Licensing and referred to committee on State Affairs and Government Operations pursuant to Assembly Resolution 19
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1