Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 214

Ex parte communications in contested cases before the Public Service Commission

Became law

The governor signed it on Jul 8, 2013. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 20, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jun 6, 2013

  4. Senate vote, passed

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 28

Latest entry in the official record, Jul 8, 2013: “Published 7-6-2013”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits certain ex parte communications in contested cases, which are state agency proceedings that affect the substantial interest of a party. An ex parte communication is one that is made without the knowledge of all of the parties. An ex parte communication in a contested case is subject to the prohibition if it is made before a decision is rendered and it is either: 1) relative to the merits;

or 2) a threat or offer of reward. If the prohibition applies, the following are prohibited from making an ex parte communication to either the hearing examiner or any other official or employee of the state agency who is involved in the decision-making process: 1) a state agency official or any other public employee or official engaged in prosecution or advocacy regarding the matter or a related matter;

Read the full summary

2) a party to the proceeding; 3) any person with a substantial interest in the proposed agency action; and 4) an authorized representative or counsel. Current law specifies several exceptions to the prohibition.

This bill creates an additional exception to the prohibition that applies only in contested cases before the Public Service Commission (PSC). In such contested cases, the bill provides that the prohibition does not apply to an ex parte communication by or to any PSC official or employee other than the hearing examiner or the PSC commissioners.

Who's behind it

Mark Honadel, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 0 · May 31, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jun 10, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Failed, 15 to 17 · Jun 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 15, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Jul 8, 2013

    The new law was published.

  2. Jul 8, 2013

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 28.

  3. Jul 3, 2013

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 11, 2013

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Jun 11, 2013

    “Read a third time” (the official wording)

  6. Jun 10, 2013

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. Jun 7, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  8. Jun 7, 2013

    The Senate received it.

  9. Jun 6, 2013

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. May 31, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. May 31, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  12. May 28, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. May 20, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.

  14. May 20, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Honadel; cosponsored by Senator Farrow

  2. May 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. May 28, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. May 30, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. May 31, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  6. May 31, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  7. Jun 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-6-2013 by Committee on Rules

  8. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  9. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  11. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  12. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Jun 7, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  14. Jun 7, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  15. Jun 7, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  16. Jun 10, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  17. Jun 10, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 6-11-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  18. Jun 11, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  19. Jun 11, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Jun 11, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  21. Jun 11, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time

  22. Jun 11, 2013 · Senate

    Refused to refer to committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 15, Noes 17

  23. Jun 11, 2013 · Senate

    Concurred in

  24. Jun 11, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Jun 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  26. Jun 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 6-14-2013

  27. Jul 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 7-3-2013

  28. Jul 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 7-5-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 28

  29. Jul 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Published 7-6-2013

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote