Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 223

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: possession of dogs by certain felony offenders and providing a penalty. (FE)

Crime and criminals — Felony Crime victim Dogs Legislature — Criminal penalties, joint review committee on Sentences and penalties Sex crimes

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law prohibits a person from possessing a firearm if he or she is a felony

offender. A person is a felony offender if any of the following applies: 1) he or she

has been found guilty of a felony; 2) he or she has been adjudicated delinquent as a

juvenile for an act that would have been a felony if it had been committed by an adult;

or 3) he or she has been found not guilty of a felony by reason of mental disease,

defect, or illness. If a felony offender violates the prohibition against possessing a

firearm, he or she may be fined not more than $25,000 or imprisoned for not more

than ten years, or both.

This bill prohibits, for a specified period, certain felony offenders from

possessing, controlling, or residing with a vicious dog, as determined by a humane

officer or a law enforcement officer using criteria specified in the bill. The prohibition

applies to persons whose status as felony offenders is based on the commission of an

act that is classified under the bill as a serious felony (serious felony offenders). A

serious felony offender who violates the prohibition may be fined up to $10,000 or

imprisoned for up to nine months, or both. If a serious felony offender violates the

prohibition and a person or an animal suffers great bodily harm or death due to the

violation, the serious felony offender may be fined up to $10,000 or imprisoned for

up to three years and six months, or both. If a serious felony offender violates the

and a person suffers great bodily harm or death due to the violation and the serious

felony offender knowingly allowed the dog to run loose or failed to take steps to

control the dog, the serious felony offender may be fined up to $10,000 or imprisoned

for up to six years, or both.

Unless the serious felony offender is on extended supervision or another

supervised status (extended supervision), the prohibition applies to the serious

felony offender for a period of ten years following: 1) any period of incarceration for

the serious felony; 2) the conviction for the serious felony if the sentence does not

include a period of incarceration; 3) the delinquency adjudication for the serious

felony; or 4) the finding of not guilty of the serious felony by reason of insanity or

mental disease, defect, or illness. If the serious felony offender is on extended

supervision, the prohibition period applies until he or she is no longer on extended

supervision.

Under this bill, a serious felony offender may request an exemption from the

prohibition if the exemption is reasonably needed to earn a livelihood or as a

condition of employment and will not endanger public safety. A serious felony

offender seeking an exemption must file a motion in the circuit court for the county

in which he or she will possess, control, or reside with the vicious dog. The serious

felony offender must provide a copy of the motion to the district attorney for that

county, who must in turn make a reasonable attempt to contact local law enforcement

agencies to inform them of the request and to solicit any information that may be

relevant to whether the request should be granted.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Bernier (R) , Jacque (R) , Kahl (D) , Ohnstad (D) , T. Larson (R) , Wright (D)

2 cosponsors

Carpenter (D) , Hansen (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 3, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 3, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Kahl, A. Ott, Ohnstad, T. Larson, Bernier and Wright; cosponsored by Senators Hansen and Carpenter

  2. May 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Jun 10, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jul 1, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Nov 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Jacque

  9. Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Goyke

  10. Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Goyke

  11. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  13. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  14. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  15. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1