Assembly Bill 248
Restricting the release of credit information about certain protected individuals and providing a penalty. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Dec 12, 2013. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 17, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Oct 8, 2013
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Nov 12, 2013
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 78
Latest entry in the official record, Dec 12, 2013: “Published 12-13-2013”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law generally allows an individual to prohibit a consumer reporting agency (CRA) from releasing the individual's consumer report (credit report) for any purpose related to the extension of credit without the individual's prior authorization. If an individual makes a proper request to a CRA, provides proper identification, and pays any applicable fee, the CRA must include a "security freeze" on the individual's credit report. A CRA may not release an individual's credit report for an extension of credit if the report includes a security freeze. There are various exceptions to these requirements, including CRAs to which the requirements do not apply and exceptions allowing a CRA to release an individual's credit report that includes a security freeze for specified purposes or under specified circumstances.
Current law also includes procedures for an individual to authorize release of a credit report that includes a security freeze. In addition, a CRA must remove a security freeze upon an individual's request, but may charge a fee to do so.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill provides for additional security freezes by allowing representatives to obtain security freezes on behalf of protected consumers. The bill defines a "protected consumer" as either: 1) an individual who is under 16 years old; or 2) an individual for whom a guardian or conservator has been appointed. The bill defines a "representative" as a person who provides "sufficient proof of authority" to act on behalf of a protected consumer, which is defined to include: 1) a court order; 2) a power of attorney; or 3) a notarized statement describing the authority to act on behalf of a protected consumer. Under the bill, a representative may request a security freeze for a protected consumer by providing a CRA with the sufficient proof of authority described above, as well as "sufficient proof of identification" of both the representative and protected consumer. The bill defines "sufficient proof of identification" to include: 1) a social security number (SSN) or copy of a SSN card;
2) a certified or official copy of a birth certificate; or 3) a copy of a motor vehicle operator's license or identification card.
If a CRA receives a representative's request for a security freeze on behalf of a protected consumer, and the CRA already has a file on the protected consumer, the CRA must place a security freeze that prohibits the CRA from releasing the protected consumer's credit report. If the CRA does not have a file on the protected consumer, the CRA must place a security freeze by creating a record identifying the protected consumer. The bill prohibits using the record for credit considerations. The bill requires a CRA to verify that it has no file by checking names and SSNs in its existing files. The bill requires a CRA to place a security freeze within 30 days after receiving a request that complies with the bill, regardless of whether the CRA already has a file on the protected consumer. Upon placement of a security freeze, the CRA may not release the protected consumer's credit report, any information derived from the credit report, or any record created under the bill, unless the security freeze is removed as discussed below.
The bill also does the following:
1. Creates procedures for representatives and protected consumers to have CRAs remove security freezes and allows CRAs to remove security freezes based on material misrepresentation of fact by representatives or protected consumers.
2. Allows CRAs to charge a reasonable fee not exceeding $10 for placing or removing security freezes, but prohibits fees in cases involving identity theft or protected consumers under 16 years old who already have files at CRAs.
3. Creates exceptions from the bill's requirements, including the exceptions that apply to security freeze restrictions under current law, as well as exceptions for information used for criminal records, fraud prevention or detection, personal loss history information, or certain background screening purposes.
4. Allows the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and the Department of Justice to bring actions to enforce the bill's requirements.
5. Subjects a person who violates the bill to a civil forfeiture of not more than $1,000 per violation.
Who's behind it
19 lawmakers are its . 13 are Republicans and 6 are Democrats.
9 more lawmakers .
See all 28 names Hide the names
Authors (19)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Robb Kahl · Democrat, Assembly
- Amy Loudenbeck · Republican, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Don Pridemore · Republican, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Jeffrey Stone · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Williams · Republican, Assembly
- Mandy Wright · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (9)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Richard Gudex · Republican, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- John Jagler · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 0 · Sep 5, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Dec 12, 2013
The new law was published.
-
Dec 12, 2013
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 78.
-
Dec 10, 2013
Sent to the governor.
-
Nov 12, 2013
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Nov 12, 2013
The Senate passed it too.
-
Nov 11, 2013
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 9, 2013
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Oct 9, 2013
The Senate received it.
-
Oct 8, 2013
The Assembly passed it.
-
Sep 5, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Sep 5, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.
-
Aug 29, 2013
1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.
-
Aug 6, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jul 11, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 17, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.
-
Jun 17, 2013
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Stone, Hebl, Kahl, Jacque, Loudenbeck, Spiros, Ballweg, Williams, Brooks, Pope, A. Ott, Ohnstad, Wright, Berceau, Ripp, Pridemore, Tittl and Bernier; cosponsored by Senators Schultz, Risser, Gudex, L. Taylor, Grothman and Hansen
- Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection
- Jul 11, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 6, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Aug 22, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Hebl and Stone
- Aug 27, 2013 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Aug 29, 2013 · Assembly
Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor
- Aug 29, 2013 · Assembly
Representative Jagler added as a coauthor
- Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 by Committee on Rules
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 9, 2013 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Oct 9, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Oct 9, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 11, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Nov 11, 2013 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Dec 4, 2013 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 12-4-2013
- Dec 10, 2013 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 12-10-2013
- Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 12-12-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 78
- Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly
Published 12-13-2013
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote