Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 248

Restricting the release of credit information about certain protected individuals and providing a penalty. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 12, 2013. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 17, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 8, 2013

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 12, 2013

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 78

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 12, 2013: “Published 12-13-2013”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law generally allows an individual to prohibit a consumer reporting agency (CRA) from releasing the individual's consumer report (credit report) for any purpose related to the extension of credit without the individual's prior authorization. If an individual makes a proper request to a CRA, provides proper identification, and pays any applicable fee, the CRA must include a "security freeze" on the individual's credit report. A CRA may not release an individual's credit report for an extension of credit if the report includes a security freeze. There are various exceptions to these requirements, including CRAs to which the requirements do not apply and exceptions allowing a CRA to release an individual's credit report that includes a security freeze for specified purposes or under specified circumstances.

Current law also includes procedures for an individual to authorize release of a credit report that includes a security freeze. In addition, a CRA must remove a security freeze upon an individual's request, but may charge a fee to do so.

Read the full summary

This bill provides for additional security freezes by allowing representatives to obtain security freezes on behalf of protected consumers. The bill defines a "protected consumer" as either: 1) an individual who is under 16 years old; or 2) an individual for whom a guardian or conservator has been appointed. The bill defines a "representative" as a person who provides "sufficient proof of authority" to act on behalf of a protected consumer, which is defined to include: 1) a court order; 2) a power of attorney; or 3) a notarized statement describing the authority to act on behalf of a protected consumer. Under the bill, a representative may request a security freeze for a protected consumer by providing a CRA with the sufficient proof of authority described above, as well as "sufficient proof of identification" of both the representative and protected consumer. The bill defines "sufficient proof of identification" to include: 1) a social security number (SSN) or copy of a SSN card;

2) a certified or official copy of a birth certificate; or 3) a copy of a motor vehicle operator's license or identification card.

If a CRA receives a representative's request for a security freeze on behalf of a protected consumer, and the CRA already has a file on the protected consumer, the CRA must place a security freeze that prohibits the CRA from releasing the protected consumer's credit report. If the CRA does not have a file on the protected consumer, the CRA must place a security freeze by creating a record identifying the protected consumer. The bill prohibits using the record for credit considerations. The bill requires a CRA to verify that it has no file by checking names and SSNs in its existing files. The bill requires a CRA to place a security freeze within 30 days after receiving a request that complies with the bill, regardless of whether the CRA already has a file on the protected consumer. Upon placement of a security freeze, the CRA may not release the protected consumer's credit report, any information derived from the credit report, or any record created under the bill, unless the security freeze is removed as discussed below.

The bill also does the following:

1. Creates procedures for representatives and protected consumers to have CRAs remove security freezes and allows CRAs to remove security freezes based on material misrepresentation of fact by representatives or protected consumers.

2. Allows CRAs to charge a reasonable fee not exceeding $10 for placing or removing security freezes, but prohibits fees in cases involving identity theft or protected consumers under 16 years old who already have files at CRAs.

3. Creates exceptions from the bill's requirements, including the exceptions that apply to security freeze restrictions under current law, as well as exceptions for information used for criminal records, fraud prevention or detection, personal loss history information, or certain background screening purposes.

4. Allows the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and the Department of Justice to bring actions to enforce the bill's requirements.

5. Subjects a person who violates the bill to a civil forfeiture of not more than $1,000 per violation.

Who's behind it

19 lawmakers are its ⁠. 13 are Republicans and 6 are Democrats.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 28 names

Authors (19)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Sep 5, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 12, 2013

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 12, 2013

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 78.

  3. Dec 10, 2013

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 12, 2013

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  5. Nov 12, 2013

    The Senate passed it too.

  6. Nov 11, 2013

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  7. Oct 9, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  8. Oct 9, 2013

    The Senate received it.

  9. Oct 8, 2013

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Sep 5, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Sep 5, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  12. Aug 29, 2013

    1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.

  13. Aug 6, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jul 11, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jun 17, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  16. Jun 17, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Stone, Hebl, Kahl, Jacque, Loudenbeck, Spiros, Ballweg, Williams, Brooks, Pope, A. Ott, Ohnstad, Wright, Berceau, Ripp, Pridemore, Tittl and Bernier; cosponsored by Senators Schultz, Risser, Gudex, L. Taylor, Grothman and Hansen

  2. Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jul 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Aug 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Hebl and Stone

  6. Aug 27, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Aug 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor

  8. Aug 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Jagler added as a coauthor

  9. Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  10. Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  11. Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 by Committee on Rules

  12. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  19. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  21. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  25. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  27. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Dec 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 12-4-2013

  30. Dec 10, 2013 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 12-10-2013

  31. Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-12-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 78

  32. Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Published 12-13-2013

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote