Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: restricting the release of credit information about certain protected individuals and providing a penalty. (FE)
Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Air pollution Children Credit Crime and criminals Guardian and ward Justice, department of
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law generally allows an individual to prohibit a consumer reporting
agency (CRA) from releasing the individual's consumer report (credit report) for any
purpose related to the extension of credit without the individual's prior
authorization. If an individual makes a proper request to a CRA, provides proper
identification, and pays any applicable fee, the CRA must include a "security freeze"
on the individual's credit report. A CRA may not release an individual's credit report
for an extension of credit if the report includes a security freeze. There are various
exceptions to these requirements, including CRAs to which the requirements do not
apply and exceptions allowing a CRA to release an individual's credit report that
includes a security freeze for specified purposes or under specified circumstances.
Current law also includes procedures for an individual to authorize release of a credit
report that includes a security freeze. In addition, a CRA must remove a security
freeze upon an individual's request, but may charge a fee to do so.
This bill provides for additional security freezes by allowing representatives to
obtain security freezes on behalf of protected consumers. The bill defines a
"protected consumer" as either: 1) an individual who is under 16 years old; or 2) an
individual for whom a guardian or conservator has been appointed. The bill defines
a "representative" as a person who provides "sufficient proof of authority" to act on
behalf of a protected consumer, which is defined to include: 1) a court order; 2) a
power of attorney; or 3) a notarized statement describing the authority to act on
behalf of a protected consumer. Under the bill, a representative may request a
security freeze for a protected consumer by providing a CRA with the sufficient proof
of authority described above, as well as "sufficient proof of identification" of both the
representative and protected consumer. The bill defines "sufficient proof of
identification" to include: 1) a social security number (SSN) or copy of a SSN card;
2) a certified or official copy of a birth certificate; or 3) a copy of a motor vehicle
operator's license or identification card.
If a CRA receives a representative's request for a security freeze on behalf of a
protected consumer, and the CRA already has a file on the protected consumer, the
CRA must place a security freeze that prohibits the CRA from releasing the protected
consumer's credit report. If the CRA does not have a file on the protected consumer,
the CRA must place a security freeze by creating a record identifying the protected
consumer. The bill prohibits using the record for credit considerations. The bill
requires a CRA to verify that it has no file by checking names and SSNs in its existing
files. The bill requires a CRA to place a security freeze within 30 days after receiving
a request that complies with the bill, regardless of whether the CRA already has a
file on the protected consumer. Upon placement of a security freeze, the CRA may
not release the protected consumer's credit report, any information derived from the
credit report, or any record created under the bill, unless the security freeze is
removed as discussed below.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Sep 5, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Nov 11, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Stone, Hebl, Kahl, Jacque, Loudenbeck, Spiros, Ballweg, Williams, Brooks, Pope, A. Ott, Ohnstad, Wright, Berceau, Ripp, Pridemore, Tittl and Bernier; cosponsored by Senators Schultz, Risser, Gudex, L. Taylor, Grothman and Hansen
- Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection
- Jul 11, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 6, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Aug 22, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Hebl and Stone
- Aug 27, 2013 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Aug 29, 2013 · Assembly
Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor
- Aug 29, 2013 · Assembly
Representative Jagler added as a coauthor
- Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 by Committee on Rules
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 9, 2013 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Oct 9, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Oct 9, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 11, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Nov 11, 2013 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Dec 4, 2013 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 12-4-2013
- Dec 10, 2013 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 12-10-2013
- Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 12-12-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 78
- Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly
Published 12-13-2013