Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 248

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: restricting the release of credit information about certain protected individuals and providing a penalty. (FE)

Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Air pollution Children Credit Crime and criminals Guardian and ward Justice, department of

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law generally allows an individual to prohibit a consumer reporting

agency (CRA) from releasing the individual's consumer report (credit report) for any

purpose related to the extension of credit without the individual's prior

authorization. If an individual makes a proper request to a CRA, provides proper

identification, and pays any applicable fee, the CRA must include a "security freeze"

on the individual's credit report. A CRA may not release an individual's credit report

for an extension of credit if the report includes a security freeze. There are various

exceptions to these requirements, including CRAs to which the requirements do not

apply and exceptions allowing a CRA to release an individual's credit report that

includes a security freeze for specified purposes or under specified circumstances.

Current law also includes procedures for an individual to authorize release of a credit

report that includes a security freeze. In addition, a CRA must remove a security

freeze upon an individual's request, but may charge a fee to do so.

This bill provides for additional security freezes by allowing representatives to

obtain security freezes on behalf of protected consumers. The bill defines a

"protected consumer" as either: 1) an individual who is under 16 years old; or 2) an

individual for whom a guardian or conservator has been appointed. The bill defines

a "representative" as a person who provides "sufficient proof of authority" to act on

behalf of a protected consumer, which is defined to include: 1) a court order; 2) a

power of attorney; or 3) a notarized statement describing the authority to act on

behalf of a protected consumer. Under the bill, a representative may request a

security freeze for a protected consumer by providing a CRA with the sufficient proof

of authority described above, as well as "sufficient proof of identification" of both the

representative and protected consumer. The bill defines "sufficient proof of

identification" to include: 1) a social security number (SSN) or copy of a SSN card;

2) a certified or official copy of a birth certificate; or 3) a copy of a motor vehicle

operator's license or identification card.

If a CRA receives a representative's request for a security freeze on behalf of a

protected consumer, and the CRA already has a file on the protected consumer, the

CRA must place a security freeze that prohibits the CRA from releasing the protected

consumer's credit report. If the CRA does not have a file on the protected consumer,

the CRA must place a security freeze by creating a record identifying the protected

consumer. The bill prohibits using the record for credit considerations. The bill

requires a CRA to verify that it has no file by checking names and SSNs in its existing

files. The bill requires a CRA to place a security freeze within 30 days after receiving

a request that complies with the bill, regardless of whether the CRA already has a

file on the protected consumer. Upon placement of a security freeze, the CRA may

not release the protected consumer's credit report, any information derived from the

credit report, or any record created under the bill, unless the security freeze is

removed as discussed below.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Berceau (D) , Bernier (R) , Brooks (R) , Hebl (D) , Jacque (R) , Kahl (D) , Loudenbeck (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Pridemore (R) , Ripp (R) , Spiros (R) , Stone (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tittl (R) , Williams (R) , Wright (D)

9 cosponsors

Carpenter (D) , Grothman (R) , Gudex (R) , Hansen (D) , Jagler (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Lassa (D) , Risser (D) , Schultz (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Sep 5, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Nov 11, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Stone, Hebl, Kahl, Jacque, Loudenbeck, Spiros, Ballweg, Williams, Brooks, Pope, A. Ott, Ohnstad, Wright, Berceau, Ripp, Pridemore, Tittl and Bernier; cosponsored by Senators Schultz, Risser, Gudex, L. Taylor, Grothman and Hansen

  2. Jun 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jul 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Aug 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Hebl and Stone

  6. Aug 27, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Aug 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor

  8. Aug 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Jagler added as a coauthor

  9. Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  10. Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  11. Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 by Committee on Rules

  12. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  19. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  21. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  25. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  27. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Dec 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 12-4-2013

  30. Dec 10, 2013 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 12-10-2013

  31. Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-12-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 78

  32. Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Published 12-13-2013