Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 279

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: knowledge tests for commercial driver license applicants who hold a military commercial driver license. (FE)

Military personnel Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Transportation, department of — Vehicles

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) generally must

examine every applicant for an operator's license, including a commercial driver

license (CDL), and the examination must include both a knowledge test and a driving

skills test. DOT must promulgate rules setting testing standards consistent with

federal law, including standards for CDL applicants. DOT's standards must require

a knowledge test and driving skills test for persons making their first application for

an operator's license. DOT may require persons changing their residence to this

state from another jurisdiction to take all or parts of the examination required of

persons making their first application for an operator's license.

Also under current law, if an applicant to DOT for a CDL holds a military CDL

and submits the military CDL and certain other documentation to DOT, DOT must

treat the application the same as an application submitted by a person holding a CDL

from another jurisdiction.

Federal regulations generally require that a military CDL holder who applies

for a state-issued CDL must pass a knowledge test before the CDL is issued.

This bill specifies that, if a military CDL holder applies to DOT for a CDL, DOT

must require the applicant to take and pass applicable knowledge tests, unless the

applicant is exempt from, or eligible for a waiver of, these knowledge tests under

applicable federal regulations.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Kooyenga (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Ripp (R) , Spiros (R) , Weatherston (R) , Wright (D)

5 cosponsors

Hansen (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Olsen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Schultz (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

Passed 13–0 Sep 5, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Aug 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Ripp, Bernard Schaber, Kooyenga, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Spiros, Weatherston and Wright; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Hansen, Olsen, Schultz and L. Taylor

  2. Aug 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Aug 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Aug 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Aug 27, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  7. Sep 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  8. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1