Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: authorizing a city or village to require the Department of Revenue to redetermine the value of the tax incremental base of certain tax incremental districts. (FE)
Municipality — Taxation Property tax Revenue, department of Village — Taxation
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a
TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several
steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the
proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local
planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed
project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID.
Generally under current law a local planning commission may amend the
project plan of a TID, by adding or subtracting territory from the district, not more
than four times during the TID's existence. If a TID's project plan is amended,
current law authorizes DOR to redetermine the TID's tax incremental base. DOR
may charge a city or village $1,000 to determine or redetermine a TID's tax
incremental base or, if a project plan amendment both adds and subtracts territory,
DOR may impose a fee of $2,000.
Under this bill, a city or village may adopt a resolution, subject to joint review
board approval, and not more than twice during a TID's life, requiring DOR to
redetermine the tax incremental base of a TID which is in a decrement situation that
has continued for at least two consecutive years. The bill defines decrement situation
as a situation in which the current aggregate equalized value of all the taxable
property within the TID is at least 10 percent less than the current value of the TID's
tax incremental base. DOR may charge the city of village $1,000 for the
redetermination.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 7, Noes 2
Passed 7–2 Jan 30, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Jan 30, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 20, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Schraa, Hintz, Spiros, Thiesfeldt, Weatherston, Brooks, Ripp, Stone, Kahl, Kolste, Mason, Wright, Jorgensen, Zepnick and Bies; cosponsored by Senators Gudex, L. Taylor, Grothman, Harris, T. Cullen, Olsen and Jauch
- Aug 20, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State and Local Finance
- Sep 17, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 2, 2013 · Assembly
Representative Ohnstad added as a coauthor
- Oct 30, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 6, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Nass
- Jan 22, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Stroebel
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 7, Noes 2
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1