Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 290

An expenditure of $90,000 from the general fund for payment of a claim against the state made by Robert Lee Stinson. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 8, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 20, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 96 to 0

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 206

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Published 4-9-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill directs expenditure of $90,000 from the general fund in payment of a claim made by Robert Lee Stinson against the state. In November 1984, the body of Ione Cychosz was found in the city of Milwaukee. Ms. Cychosz was beaten to death and there were numerous bite marks on her body. In December 1985, the claimant was tried and convicted of her murder. There were no witnesses against him, and the only physical evidence was expert witness testimony purporting to match the claimant's dentition with the bite marks on the victim's body. The bite marks did not match because the claimant was missing a tooth, and the bite marks showed the perpetrator did not have that tooth missing, but the claimant's attorney failed to raise that issue. The claimant was sentenced to life imprisonment. After his conviction, the claimant obtained a reexamination of the bite mark evidence using more modern odontological techniques that excluded the claimant as the perpetrator. The state crime laboratory examined samples of the blood and saliva found on the victim's clothing and conclusively excluded the claimant as the source of the samples. The claimant asserted that at the time of the crime he was at a party, which was corroborated by five other persons. In January 2009, the circuit court for Milwaukee County vacated the claimant's conviction and sentence. In July 2009, the state dismissed all charges against the claimant. In July 2009, the DNA of another man, Moses Price, was matched to the crime scene and Mr. Price confessed to the crime. The claimant claimed $5,000 per year for 23 years of wrongful imprisonment plus $14,000 in attorney fees on behalf of the Wisconsin Innocence Project, which provided assistance to the claimant (total $129,000).

Under section 775.05 of the statutes the Claims Board may award compensation to a person who is imprisoned for a crime of which he or she is innocent if the board finds that the evidence is clear and convincing, that the person is innocent, and that the person did not by his or her act or failure to act contribute to bring about the conviction for which he or she seeks compensation. The amount awarded by the board may not exceed a total of $25,000, nor may an award be based upon a rate of compensation exceeding $5,000 per year. Compensation awarded by the board must include any amount to which the board finds that the claimant is entitled for attorney fees, costs, and disbursements. Under the law, if the board finds that the amount it is able to award is not adequate, it must recommend an adequate amount to the legislature.

Read the full summary

On December 27, 2010, the claims board awarded compensation to the claimant in the amount of $25,000, which was paid to the claimant on January 4, 2011. In addition, the board recommended that the claimant be paid an additional $90,000 for wrongful imprisonment (total $115,000). See 2011 Senate Journal , pp. 24-25.

Who's behind it

16 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 8 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (16)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 0 · Mar 11, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 96 to 0 · Mar 18, 2014 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (96)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 96, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 31, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Apr 1, 2014

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 8, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 206.

  3. Apr 7, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 1, 2014

    The Senate passed it too, 33 to 0.

  5. Mar 31, 2014

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 19, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Mar 19, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  8. Mar 18, 2014

    The Assembly passed it, 96 to 0.

  9. Mar 11, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. Mar 11, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 0.

  11. Mar 4, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 26, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations.

  13. Aug 30, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Aug 20, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  15. Aug 20, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  16. Aug 20, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kooyenga, Spiros, Barnes, Sinicki, Knudson, Kessler, Hebl, Ohnstad, Goyke, Hintz, Pope, Murphy, Bies, T. Larson, Brooks and Bernier; cosponsored by Senators Grothman, L. Taylor and Hansen

  2. Aug 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Rules

  3. Aug 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Rules and referred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  4. Aug 30, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 26, 2014 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and referred to committee on State Affairs and Government Operations

  6. Mar 4, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Mar 6, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Mar 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  9. Mar 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  10. Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 by Committee on Rules

  11. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 96, Noes 0

  15. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Mar 19, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Mar 19, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  18. Mar 19, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Mar 31, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  20. Mar 31, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-1-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  25. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Apr 2, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. Apr 4, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-4-2014

  28. Apr 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014

  29. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 206

  30. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-9-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote