Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 298

Creation of a Wisconsin election campaign fund, making appropriations, and providing penalties. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 23, 2013

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Joint Committee on Finance. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill authorizes each individual filing a state income tax return who has a tax liability or is owed a refund to designate that $1 of general purpose revenue be transferred to an election campaign fund administered by the Government Accountability Board (GAB) and the state treasurer. Under the bill, any candidate for a partisan state office, except district attorney, who receives at least 6 percent of the total vote cast on all ballots for the office the candidate seeks at the partisan primary and whose name is certified as a candidate in the general election is eligible to receive a grant from the fund to finance campaign expenses. The bill places the names of independent candidates on the partisan primary ballot in order to permit these candidates to qualify to receive grants. However, as under current law, a voter who votes for a party candidate for any office is not permitted to vote for any candidates not representing that party, including independent candidates. The independent candidates continue to appear on the general election ballot regardless of the number of votes they receive at the primary. A candidate for state superintendent of public instruction or justice of the supreme court who is nominated at the primary may also qualify to receive grants. In addition, a candidate for a state office at a special partisan election may qualify to receive a grant if he or she represents a party whose candidate for the same office at the most recent general election received at least 6 percent of the total vote cast for the office or if he or she actually receives at least 6 percent of the total vote cast for the office at the special election. A candidate whose name appears on the ballot at a special election for the office of state superintendent may also qualify.

The moneys in the fund are apportioned as follows: 1) in those years in which there is an election for supreme court justice, candidates for that office may receive 8 percent of the money in the fund which is divided equally among them; 2) in those years in which there is an election for state superintendent, candidates for that office may receive 8 percent of the money in the fund which is divided equally between them; 3) the remainder is apportioned among the candidates for partisan state executive offices, who may receive 25 percent of the remaining money in the fund, and candidates for legislative office, who may receive 75 of the remaining money in the fund. The fund is further apportioned among candidates for the executive offices according to a specified formula. All eligible candidates for the same office may receive equal grants. If a candidate for an office does not accept a grant, the amount for which the candidate could have qualified is potentially payable to any opposing candidates for the same office who accept grants. To complete his or her qualification, a candidate must receive contributions of money from individuals during a specified period in amounts of $100 or less cumulatively from each individual. For a candidate for a statewide office or any candidate at a special election, the contributions must equal at least 5 percent of the candidate's statutory disbursement (expenditure) level. For other candidates, the contributions must equal at least 10 percent of the candidate's statutory disbursement level. A candidate for an office who accepts a grant must agree to abide by the statutory disbursement level unless the candidate is opposed by a candidate whose name appears on the ballot and who receives at least 6 percent of the total vote for the same office at the primary if a primary was held and that candidate does not accept a grant or does not abide by the statutory disbursement level. As under current law, a candidate who does not accept a grant is not bound by any disbursement level, but such a candidate may voluntarily agree to abide by the disbursement level by filing an affidavit with GAB affirming that intention.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, grants are paid directly to each eligible candidate. Grants may be used only for office supplies or postage, or for the purchase of services from printers, graphic arts or advertising providers, or communications media. A candidate must return any unspent and unencumbered grant moneys to the state.

Under current law, no candidate for state office may receive more than 45 percent of his or her statutory disbursement level from committees other than political party committees. The bill treats grant moneys as committee contributions, thus reducing the amount of nonparty committee contributions that a candidate who accepts a grant may receive. The maximum amount that a candidate may receive is that amount, when added to all other nonparty committee contributions received by the candidate, equal to 45 percent of the candidate's disbursement level. If there is insufficient money within any account in the fund to make full payment of the grants to which all eligible candidates are entitled at any election, GAB is directed to proportionally reduce grant payments.

The bill transfers $1,128,600 from the general fund to the Wisconsin election campaign fund, which is approximately equivalent to the amount that was transferred from the campaign fund to the general fund in 2011 when the campaign fund existed under former law. Under the bill, initial grants are payable at the first election that follows the day the bill becomes law by at least 60 days, but the initial transfer of moneys from income tax designations is made on August 15 following the calendar or taxable year in which the first designations are made.

Who's behind it

15 representatives are its ⁠. All 15 are Democrats.

See all 15 names

Authors (15)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Failed, 39 to 59 · Feb 11, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from joint committee on Finance and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 59”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Sep 19, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Sep 16, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Aug 23, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  5. Aug 23, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Shankland, Kolste, Berceau, Zamarripa, Bernard Schaber, Sinicki, Kessler, Wright, Genrich, Doyle, Kahl, Jorgensen, Ohnstad and Milroy

  2. Aug 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance

  3. Sep 16, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 19, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from joint committee on Finance and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 59

  6. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote