Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 310

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: unclassified division administrators in the state civil service system. (FE)

Administration, department of — Agency and general functions Civil service Legislature — Finance, joint committee on State agencies State capitol

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

2011 Wisconsin Acts 10

and

32

and

2013 Wisconsin Act 20

increased the

number of unclassified division administrators in executive branch state agencies.

An unclassified division administrator serves at the pleasure of his or her appointing

authority, while a classified division administrator may only be removed from the

position for cause.

2011 Wisconsin Act 10

also permitted appointing authorities in

executive branch agencies to designate any managerial position as an unclassified

division administrator position.

This bill eliminates the increases in the number of unclassified division

administrator positions that were authorized in

2011 Wisconsin Acts 10

and

32

and

2013 Wisconsin Act 20

and eliminates the ability of an appointing authority to

designate any managerial position as an unclassified division administrator

position. The bill also requires the secretary of administration to submit a plan to

the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) for adjusting appropriations and authorized

classified and unclassified positions that result from the reduction in the number of

unclassified division administrators under this bill. If the cochairpersons of JCF do

not notify the secretary that JCF has scheduled a meeting for the purpose of

reviewing the plan within 14 working days after the date of his or her submittal, the

secretary may implement the plan. If within 14 working days after the date of the

submittal by the secretary the cochairpersons notify him or her that JCF has

scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the plan, the secretary may

implement the plan only with the approval of JCF.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Hebl (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kolste (D) , Milroy (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pasch (D) , Richards (D) , Sargent (D) , Sinicki (D) , Wachs (D) , Wright (D) , Young (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from joint committee on Finance and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 60

Failed 39–60 Feb 11, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Aug 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sargent, Richards, Kolste, Sinicki, Berceau, Wright, Young, Pasch, Wachs, Jorgensen, Ohnstad, Hebl, Milroy, Billings and Barca

  2. Aug 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance

  3. Sep 10, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from joint committee on Finance and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 60

  5. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1