Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: unclassified division administrators in the state civil service system. (FE)
Administration, department of — Agency and general functions Civil service Legislature — Finance, joint committee on State agencies State capitol
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
2011 Wisconsin Acts 10
and
32
and
2013 Wisconsin Act 20
increased the
number of unclassified division administrators in executive branch state agencies.
An unclassified division administrator serves at the pleasure of his or her appointing
authority, while a classified division administrator may only be removed from the
position for cause.
2011 Wisconsin Act 10
also permitted appointing authorities in
executive branch agencies to designate any managerial position as an unclassified
division administrator position.
This bill eliminates the increases in the number of unclassified division
administrator positions that were authorized in
2011 Wisconsin Acts 10
and
32
and
2013 Wisconsin Act 20
and eliminates the ability of an appointing authority to
designate any managerial position as an unclassified division administrator
position. The bill also requires the secretary of administration to submit a plan to
the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) for adjusting appropriations and authorized
classified and unclassified positions that result from the reduction in the number of
unclassified division administrators under this bill. If the cochairpersons of JCF do
not notify the secretary that JCF has scheduled a meeting for the purpose of
reviewing the plan within 14 working days after the date of his or her submittal, the
secretary may implement the plan. If within 14 working days after the date of the
submittal by the secretary the cochairpersons notify him or her that JCF has
scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the plan, the secretary may
implement the plan only with the approval of JCF.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from joint committee on Finance and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 60
Failed 39–60 Feb 11, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 23, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Sargent, Richards, Kolste, Sinicki, Berceau, Wright, Young, Pasch, Wachs, Jorgensen, Ohnstad, Hebl, Milroy, Billings and Barca
- Aug 23, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance
- Sep 10, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from joint committee on Finance and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 60
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1