Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 311

Medicaid expansion, eligibility, and other changes to BadgerCare Plus, and making appropriations. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 23, 2013

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Joint Committee on Finance. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, the Department of Health Services (DHS) administers the Medical Assistance (MA) program, which is a joint federal and state program that provides health services to individuals who have limited financial resources. Some services are provided through programs that operate under a waiver of federal Medicaid laws, including services provided through the BadgerCare Plus (BC+) and BadgerCare Plus Core (BC+ Core) programs.

Under current law, certain parents and caretaker relatives with incomes of not more than 200 percent of the federal poverty line (FPL) are eligible for BC+ benefits.

Read the full summary

Beginning on January 1, 2014, the income eligibility level for parents and caretaker relatives is 100 percent of the FPL before a 5 percent income disregard is applied.

Under current law, adults who are under age 65, who have a family income that does not exceed 200 percent of the FPL and who are not otherwise eligible for MA, including BC+, are eligible for benefits under BC+ Core. Beginning January 1, 2014, only those individuals whose family incomes do not exceed 100 percent of the FPL, before a 5 percent income disregard is applied, are eligible for BC+ Core. Also, beginning on January 1, 2014, DHS is not limited to providing only basic primary and preventive care coverage to recipients of BC+ Core benefits. The biennial budget, 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 , creates a procedure requiring DHS to maintain current income eligibility levels for a certain period for parents and caretaker relatives enrolled in BC+ and for individuals receiving BC+ Core benefits if DHS has not received certification of an American health benefit exchange, if federal law requires such certification.

This bill changes the family income eligibility level on January 1, 2014, to up to 133 percent of the FPL for parents and caretaker relatives under BC+ and for individuals under BC+ Core. The federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act allows a state to receive an enhanced federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) payment for providing benefits to certain individuals through a state's MA program.

The bill requires DHS to comply with all federal requirements and to request any amendment to the state MA plan, waiver of Medicaid law, or other federal approval necessary to qualify for the highest available enhanced FMAP for parents and caretaker relatives and individuals eligible for BC+ Core (collectively nonpregnant, nonelderly adults). If DHS does not qualify for the enhanced FMAP or if the FMAP is reduced, DHS is required to submit to the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) a fiscal analysis comparing the cost of covering nonpregnant, nonelderly adults under the MA program at up to 133 percent of the FPL to the cost of reducing income eligibility to those adults to up to 100 percent of the FPL. DHS may reduce income eligibility levels for nonpregnant, nonelderly adults to up to 100 percent of the FPL only if JCF approves.

Under current law, certain individuals are eligible for transitional MA benefits.

Current law allows DHS to charge a premium to a recipient of continued transitional MA benefits whose income exceeds 100 percent of the FPL if the federal Department of Health and Human Services (federal DHHS) allows. This bill eliminates the ability for DHS to charge a premium to individuals receiving continued transitional MA benefits.

Before the effective date of 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 , a child whose premium for BC+ is unpaid is not eligible for BC+ for six months except for any month the child's family income does not exceed 150 percent of the FPL. Under current law, under 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 , the ineligibility period for a child for nonpayment of a BC+ premium is three months, or up to 12 months if the federal DHHS approves, except for any month in which the child's family income does not exceed 150 percent of the FPL. That ineligibility period does not apply to a child who has paid the outstanding premiums. This bill returns the ineligibility period for nonpayment of BC+ premiums for a child to six months, except for any month in which the child's family income does not exceed 150 percent of the FPL. Under the bill, DHS is no longer allowed to apply an ineligibility period of longer than six months with federal DHHS approval.

Who's behind it

28 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 28 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 30 names

Authors (28)

Signed on in support (2)

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Aug 23, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  3. Aug 23, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Richards, Riemer, Young, Pasch, Kolste, Bewley, Johnson, Bernard Schaber, Shankland, Mason, Sinicki, Berceau, Zepnick, Wright, Smith, Doyle, C. Taylor, Kahl, Jorgensen, Ohnstad, Barnes, Hebl, Ringhand, Vruwink, Milroy, Sargent, Billings and Barca; cosponsored by Senators Risser and T. Cullen

  2. Aug 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance

  3. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor