Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 356

A grant for the relocation of a county trunk highway in Manitowoc and Sheboygan counties and making an appropriation. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Oct 23, 2013. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 11, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 8, 2013

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 49

Latest entry in the official record, Oct 23, 2013: “Published 10-24-2013”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, as created in 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 (the Biennial Budget Act), the Department of Transportation (DOT) must award a grant in the 2013-15 fiscal biennium to Manitowoc County, Sheboygan County, the town of Centerville in Manitowoc County, the town of Mosel in Sheboygan County, the town of Sheboygan in Sheboygan County, and the village of Cleveland in Manitowoc County (affected local governments) for the relocation of CTH "LS" in Manitowoc and Sheboygan counties and the construction of access roads to properties along CTH "LS" (the project) if the affected local governments reach a jurisdictional transfer agreement that meets certain criteria. The amount of the grant may not exceed $4,200,000 or 50 percent of the project costs, whichever is less. The grant must be paid from DOT's appropriation for discretionary grants under the Local Roads Improvement Program (LRIP), notwithstanding limitations on or eligibility requirements for LRIP aids.

Under this bill, the grant is not paid from the LRIP program appropriation.

Read the full summary

Instead, the grant is paid from a new, sum certain appropriation of $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2013-14. The bill removes the requirement that the grant not exceed 50 percent of the project costs. The bill also reduces the allocation under LRIP for discretionary grants for county trunk highway improvements by $400,000 in fiscal year 2013-14.

Who's behind it

Mike Endsley, a Republican, is its ⁠.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 3 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 7 votes on this bill.

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 14 to 2 · Sep 18, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 14 to 2 · Sep 18, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 2 · Oct 3, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 2 · Oct 3, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 79 to 17 · Oct 8, 2013 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (79)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 79, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Oct 15, 2013

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Oct 23, 2013

    The new law was published.

  2. Oct 23, 2013

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 49.

  3. Oct 22, 2013

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Oct 15, 2013

    The Senate passed it too, 33 to 0.

  5. Oct 14, 2013

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Oct 9, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Oct 9, 2013

    The Senate received it.

  8. Oct 8, 2013

    The Assembly passed it, 79 to 17.

  9. Oct 8, 2013

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Oct 3, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Oct 3, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 2.

  12. Oct 3, 2013

    “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  13. Sep 24, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Sep 18, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  15. Sep 18, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 14 to 2.

  16. Sep 18, 2013

    “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  17. Sep 13, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Sep 12, 2013

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  19. Sep 11, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  20. Sep 11, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Endsley; cosponsored by Senator Leibham

  2. Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance

  3. Sep 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Tittl added as a coauthor

  4. Sep 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Sep 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Joint Committee on Finance

  7. Sep 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 2

  8. Sep 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 2

  9. Sep 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Transportation

  10. Sep 24, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  11. Oct 1, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2

  13. Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2

  14. Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  15. Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 by Committee on Rules

  16. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  18. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 79, Noes 17

  21. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  24. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Oct 14, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  26. Oct 14, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-15-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  28. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  30. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  31. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Oct 16, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  33. Oct 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 10-22-2013

  34. Oct 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 10-22-2013

  35. Oct 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 10-23-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 49

  36. Oct 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Published 10-24-2013

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote

More in the glossary