Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: mortgage satisfaction and an exception to the real estate transfer fee. (FE)
Legislature — Tax exemptions, joint survey committee on Mortgage Motor vehicle Real estate transfer fee
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the holder of any type of mortgage is required to record a
satisfaction of mortgage within 30 days after the mortgagor completes full
performance of the conditions of the mortgage. However, if the mortgage is fully
performed and the mortgage holder receives by certified mail a written request from
the mortgagor for a full satisfaction, the mortgage holder must record a satisfaction
of mortgage within seven days or is liable to the mortgagor for actual damages plus
penalty damages of $100 for each day that the violation remains uncorrected, up to
$2,000 in penalty damages. This bill repeals those provisions and replaces them with
mortgage satisfaction provisions that are similar to the Uniform Residential
Mortgage Satisfaction Act (URMSA), except that, with the exception of affidavits of
satisfaction, the new provisions apply to all mortgages, not just mortgages on
residential property.
Under the bill, a creditor who has a security interest in real property must
record a satisfaction of the security instrument (mortgage) within 30 days after the
secured creditor receives full payment of the secured obligation or payment as
provided in a payoff statement provided by the creditor to the landowner or other
person authorized to request a payoff statement. If the creditor does not do so within
the required time, the creditor is liable to the landowner for $500, plus any actual
damages and reasonable attorney fees and court costs, but no punitive damages.
The bill provides another mortgage satisfaction option for mortgages on
residential real property: recording an affidavit of satisfaction of a security
instrument. Under this option, upon or at any time after full performance or
payment as provided in a payoff statement by the residential property owner, a
satisfaction agent authorized by the owner may give the secured creditor notice that
the satisfaction agent may record an affidavit of satisfaction of the security
instrument. Under the bill, only a title insurance company acting directly or through
an authorized agent may act as a satisfaction agent. The bill specifies the
information that must be contained in the notice that is sent to the secured creditor,
such as that the satisfaction agent has reasonable grounds to believe that the
property is residential real property and that the secured creditor has received full
payment or payment as provided in a payoff statement. After providing the notice,
the satisfaction agent may submit the affidavit of satisfaction to the register of deeds
for recording if the secured creditor authorizes the satisfaction agent to do so or if the
secured creditor does not, within 30 days after receiving the notice, record a
satisfaction. The satisfaction agent may not record the affidavit of satisfaction,
however, if the agent receives notice from the secured creditor that the security
instrument has been assigned, in which case the satisfaction agent must provide the
notice to record an affidavit of satisfaction to the assignee, or that the secured
obligation has not been satisfied, unless the satisfaction agent has reasonable
grounds to believe that a person paid an understated payoff amount on which the
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 13, Noes 0
Passed 13–0 Oct 3, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 17, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Stroebel, Bernier, Nygren, A. Ott, Kooyenga, Doyle, Jacque and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators Harsdorf and Shilling
- Sep 17, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Financial Institutions
- Sep 26, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 26, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 27, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 1, 2013 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1