Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: accountability provisions for private schools participating in a parental choice program and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)
Kindergarten Literacy Milwaukee — School Milwaukee county Parochial and private educational institutions Public instruction, department of Racine, city of School School — Attendance School — Building School — Curriculum School — Discipline School — State aid State superintendent of public instruction Teacher — Certificate
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes a number of changes to the law governing the Milwaukee
Parental Choice Program, the Racine Parental Choice Program, and the statewide
parental choice program (parental choice programs). The changes are to take effect
in the 2014-15 school year.
Family income for pupil eligibility
Current law permits a pupil to attend a participating private school under the
Racine Parental Choice Program or the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program if the
pupil resides in the Racine Unified School District (RUSD) or the Milwaukee Public
School District (MPS), respectively, and the family income of the pupil does not
exceed three times the federal poverty level.
2013 Wisconsin Act 20
(the biennial
budget bill) (Act 20) established a new parental choice program under which a pupil
who resides in a school district other than RUSD or MPS may, beginning in the
2013-14 school year, attend a participating private school if the family income of the
pupil does not exceed 1.85 times the federal poverty level. Under each parental
choice program, if the family income of a pupil who is attending a private school
under the program increases, the pupil may continue to attend a private school under
the program.
Under this bill, beginning in the 2014-15 school year, no pupil whose family
income exceeds 1.85 times the federal poverty level may attend a participating
private school under any of the parental choice programs. The bill makes no changes
to the provisions governing a pupil who is attending a private school under the
program and whose family income increases.
Per pupil payments
Under current law, in the 2013-14 school year, for each pupil enrolled in a
private school under a parental choice program, the department must pay to the
private school an amount equal to the private school's per pupil operating and debt
service cost that is related to educational programming (educational costs) or $6,442
(the maximum payment per pupil), whichever is less. Also under current law, in the
2014-15 school year, the maximum payment per pupil increases to $7,210 for a pupil
enrolled in a grade from kindergarten to 8 and to $7,856 for a pupil enrolled in a grade
from 9 to 12.
Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, if a private school enrolls pupils under
a parental choice program in any grade from K to 8 and also in any grade from 9 to
12, current law prohibits the department from determining separate educational
costs for pupils enrolled in grades K to 8 and for pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12.
Instead, the maximum payment per pupil for that school would be an amount
determined by: (a) multiplying the number of pupils enrolled in the school under a
choice program in any grade from K to 8 by the maximum payment amount for those
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Bewley (D) , Billings (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Clark (D) , Danou (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Hulsey (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kahl (D) , Kolste (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope (D) , Richards (D) , Riemer (D) , Ringhand (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Smith (D) , Wachs (D) , Wright (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Education and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 59
Failed 38–59 Feb 18, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 19, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Pope, Wright, Clark, Bernard Schaber, Kahl, Danou, Billings, Ohnstad, Kolste, Pasch, Bewley, C. Taylor, Riemer, Berceau, Sargent, Shankland, Jorgensen, Hintz, Goyke, Johnson, Ringhand, Hebl, Richards, Smith, Wachs, Genrich and Hulsey; cosponsored by Senators Lehman, Shilling, Erpenbach, Miller, Jauch, Hansen, T. Cullen, Risser, Vinehout, C. Larson, Harris, Lassa, Wirch and Schultz
- Sep 19, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
- Nov 20, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Education and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 59
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1