Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: the student information system, a school and school district accountability system, low-performing schools and school districts, and charter school contracts. (FE)
Contracts Data processing Legislative audit bureau Milwaukee — School Milwaukee county Parochial and private educational institutions Paternity Public instruction, department of Public liability School School — Attendance School — Board School — Evaluation and testing
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Student information system
Current law directs the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) to develop a
proposal for a multiple-vendor student information system (SIS). DPI must submit
the proposal to the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) for its approval. If JCF
approves the proposal, DPI must implement it and must ensure that information
about pupils enrolled in charter schools and about pupils enrolled in private schools
participating in a parental choice program (PCP) is collected and maintained in the
SIS. Current law also provides that if the SIS is established, DPI must ensure that
within five years, every school district and every charter school is using the SIS, and
that every private school participating in a PCP is either using the SIS or is using
a system that is interoperable with the SIS. Current law authorizes DPI to
promulgate rules establishing a fee for use of the SIS.
This bill provides that if the SIS is established, DPI must ensure that within
five years, every school district and every charter school, other than an independent
charter school, is using the system. The bill also provides that, beginning in the
2014-15 school year, DPI must ensure that every independent charter school and
every private school participating in an SIS is either using the SIS or is using a
system that is commercially available, capable of providing the information
required, able to obtain pupil identification numbers, and compatible with the most
recent version of the Schools Interoperability Framework. If the SIS is established,
the bill allows DPI to promulgate rules establishing a fee for using the SIS.
Finally, the bill specifies that a private school participating in a PCP is not
required to include in the SIS it is using information about pupils who are not
attending the private school under the PCP.
School and school district accountability
Current law directs DPI, annually by September 1, to publish a school and
school district accountability report that includes the following components:
1. Multiple measures to determine a school's performance or a school district's
improvement, including pupil achievement and growth in reading and mathematics;
measures of college and career readiness; and gaps in pupil achievement and
graduation rates categorized by various factors.
2. An index system to identify a school's level of performance and annually
place each school into one of five performance categories.
Current law provides that one year after an independent charter school or a
private school participating in a PCP begins using the SIS or a system that is
interoperable with the SIS, DPI must include the school in its school accountability
report.
This bill eliminates all of the above provisions and establishes a school and
school district accountability system, initially effective in the 2014-15 school year,
that is applicable to public schools, charter schools, and private schools participating
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Sep 19, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kestell, Bies and A. Ott; cosponsored by Senator Olsen
- Sep 19, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
- Dec 17, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 10, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kestell and Steineke
- Feb 12, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 19, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Steineke
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 offered by Representatives Pope, Clark, Wright and Hesselbein
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1