Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 386

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the effect of changes in requirements for development-related permits or authorizations on persons who apply for the permits or authorizations.

Building County Industrial development Municipality — Planning Ordinance Postage and postal service

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a city, village, or town that is authorized to exercise village

powers or a county (political subdivision) is authorized to enact zoning ordinances

that regulate and restrict the height, number of stories, and size of buildings and

other structures, the percentage of lot that may be occupied, the size of yards and

other open spaces, the density of population, and the location and use of buildings,

structures, and land for various purposes. Also under current law, case law provides

that where substantial rights have vested, zoning ordinances cannot be applied

retroactively.

Under this bill, if a person has submitted an application for a permit or

authorization for building, zoning, driveway, stormwater, or other activity related to

residential, commercial, or industrial development (approval), the political

subdivision must approve, deny, or conditionally approve the application based on

regulations, ordinances, rules, or other properly adopted requirements in effect at

the time the application for an approval is submitted to the political subdivision

(existing requirements). In addition, if a project requires more than one approval or

approvals from more than one political subdivision, the existing requirements

applicable in each political subdivision at the time of filing the application for the

first approval required for the project are applicable to all subsequent approvals

required for the project.

Under this bill, an application for approval is submitted upon delivery of the

application to the political subdivision or deposit of the application with the U.S.

Postal Service for mailing by certified mail. An application for approval expires 60

days after filing if the application does not comply with form and content

requirements, the political subdivision provides notice of the noncompliance, and the

applicant fails to remedy the noncompliance.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Barca (D) , Bernier (R) , Bewley (D) , Jacque (R) , Murphy (R) , Petryk (R) , Steineke (R) , Vruwink (D)

4 cosponsors

Gudex (R) , Kahl (D) , Lasee (R) , Riemer, Smith, Kolste, Ohnstad and Wright

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Nov 7, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Nov 7, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Nov 7, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Barca, Jacque, Steineke, Bewley, Bernier, Ballweg, Petryk and Vruwink; cosponsored by Senators Lasee and Gudex

  2. Sep 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate

  3. Oct 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Kahl added as a coauthor

  4. Oct 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Murphy

  5. Oct 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Murphy

  6. Oct 30, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Murphy

  7. Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Murphy

  9. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  10. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  11. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  12. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 by Committee on Rules

  13. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  14. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  15. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Representatives Riemer, Smith, Kolste, Ohnstad and Wright added as coauthors

  16. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-12-2013

  17. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  18. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1