Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 388

Traffic violations resulting in harm to vulnerable highway users, driver education instruction, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 8, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 23, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 20, 2014

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 1, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 253

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Published 4-9-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates penalty enhancements for traffic violations that result in bodily harm, great bodily harm, or death (collectively "harm") to vulnerable highway users. The bill defines "vulnerable highway user" as any of the following: 1) a pedestrian; 2) a bicyclist; 3) an operator of a moped or motor bicycle; 4) an operator of, or passenger on, an animal-drawn vehicle, farm tractor, farm truck tractor, farm trailer, or implement of husbandry; 5) a person riding upon in-line skates, a horse, or a play vehicle; 6) a law enforcement officer, traffic officer, fire fighter, or emergency medical technician, while performing his or her official duties; or 7) a person who is rendering medical or emergency assistance to another person. For most traffic violations, the bill doubles the applicable forfeiture or fine if the violation results in harm to a vulnerable highway user, and this doubling is in addition to any other applicable penalty enhancement, such as the doubling for certain traffic violations committed in highway maintenance or construction areas or in utility work areas.

However, as discussed below, for specific violations, the bill makes the offense a Class B misdemeanor if the violation results in great bodily harm to a vulnerable highway user or a Class A misdemeanor if the violation results in death to a vulnerable highway user. A Class B misdemeanor is punishable by a fine not exceeding $1,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or both. A Class A misdemeanor is punishable by a fine not exceeding $10,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 9 months or both.

Read the full summary

Under current law, a person who causes the death of another by operating or handling a vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant is guilty of a Class D felony or, if the person has been convicted of a prior operating under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug (OWI) offense relating to, a Class C felony. A Class C felony is punishable by a fine not exceeding $100,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 40 years or both. A Class D felony is punishable by a fine not exceeding $100,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 25 years or both. In addition, if a person is convicted of causing the death of another by OWI, the Department of Transportation (DOT) must in most cases revoke the person's operating privilege for 5 years. A person who causes great bodily harm to another by OWI is guilty of a Class F felony. A Class F felony is punishable by a fine not exceeding $25,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 12 years and 6 months or both. In addition, if a person is convicted of causing great bodily harm to another by OWI, DOT must in most cases revoke the person's operating privilege for 2 years. A person who causes injury to another by OWI may be fined not less then $300 nor more than $2,000 and imprisoned for not less than 30 days nor more than one year or, if the person has been convicted of a prior OWI-related offense, is guilty of a Class H felony.

Under this bill, the penalties are doubled for a person who causes injury by OWI to a vulnerable highway user. Also, DOT must in most cases revoke the person's operating privilege for 5 years and 6 months or 2 years and 6 months, respectively, for a person who causes the death of a vulnerable highway user by OWI or great bodily harm to a vulnerable highway user by OWI.

Under current law, the operator of a vehicle must yield the right-of-way to another vehicle under certain circumstances, including: when turning left across traffic; at an intersection posted with a yield sign; when entering a through highway or a highway from an alley or driveway or from a parked or standing position; or when entering a highway from another highway that ends at a "T" intersection. A person who fails to yield the right-of-way as required is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $20 nor more than $50 for a first offense and not less than $50 nor more than $100 for any subsequent offense within a year. However, if the violation results in bodily harm, great bodily harm, or death to another, the person must forfeit, respectively, $200, $500, or $1,000 for the violation and DOT must suspend the person's operating privilege for, respectively, 2 months, 3 months or 9 months. Before the person's operating privilege may be reinstated, the person must complete a vehicle right-of-way course approved by DOT.

Under this bill, the penalty for a failure to yield violation is increased to a Class B misdemeanor if the violation results in great bodily harm to a vulnerable highway user and is increased to a Class A misdemeanor if the violation results in death to a vulnerable highway user. In addition to these increased penalties, DOT must suspend the violator's operating privilege for, respectively, six months or one year.

As under current law, before the person's operating privilege may be reinstated, the person must complete a vehicle right-of-way course approved by DOT.

Under current law, the operator of a motor vehicle must yield the right-of-way to livestock being driven over or along the highway. A person who fails to yield the right-of-way to livestock is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $10 nor more than $20 for the first offense and not less than $25 nor more than $50 for the second or subsequent offense within a year.

Under this bill, the penalty for a failure to yield to livestock violation is increased to a Class B misdemeanor if the violation results in great bodily harm to a vulnerable highway user and is increased to a Class A misdemeanor if the violation results in death to a vulnerable highway user. In addition to these increased penalties, DOT must suspend the violator's operating privilege for, respectively, six months or one year. Before the person's operating privilege may be reinstated, the person must complete a safe driver course approved by DOT.

Under current law, the operator of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle proceeding in the same direction must exercise due care, leaving a safe distance but at least three feet clearance when passing the bicycle, and must maintain clearance until safely past the overtaken bicycle. Also, if the operator of a motor vehicle overtakes a motor bus that is stopped at an intersection on the right side of the roadway and that is receiving or discharging passengers, the operator must pass at a safe distance to the left of the motor bus and may not turn to the right in front of the motor bus at that intersection. A person who commits such a passing violation is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $25 nor more than $200 for the first offense and not less than $50 nor more than $500 for the second or subsequent offense within four years.

Under this bill, the penalty for a passing violation is increased to a Class B misdemeanor if the violation results in great bodily harm to a vulnerable highway user and is increased to a Class A misdemeanor if the violation results in death to a vulnerable highway user. In addition to these increased penalties, DOT must suspend the violator's operating privilege for, respectively, six months or one year.

Before the person's operating privilege may be reinstated, the person must complete a safe driver course approved by DOT.

Current law prohibits inattentive driving of a motor vehicle, which includes:

1) being so engaged or occupied, while driving a motor vehicle, as to interfere with the safe driving of the vehicle; 2) operating a motor vehicle equipped with a television or similar device in the front of the vehicle or otherwise visible to the operator; and 3) driving a motor vehicle while composing or sending an electronic text message or an e-mail message; and 4) driving a motor vehicle while using a cellular or wireless telephone, if the driver holds a probationary license or instruction permit. Any person who commits form 1) or 3) of inattentive driving is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $20 nor more than $400 and any person who commits form 2) or 4) of inattentive driving is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $20 nor more than $40 for the first offense and not less than $50 nor more than $100 for the second or subsequent offense within a year.

Under this bill, the penalty for an inattentive driving violation is increased to a Class B misdemeanor if the violation results in great bodily harm to a vulnerable highway user and is increased to a Class A misdemeanor if the violation results in death to a vulnerable highway user. In addition to these increased penalties, DOT must suspend the violator's operating privilege for, respectively, six months or one year. Before the person's operating privilege may be reinstated, the person must complete a safe driver course approved by DOT.

Under current law, local authorities may enact and enforce traffic regulations that are in strict conformity with state statutes and that provide for a forfeiture as a penalty.

Under this bill, if a local authority enacts a traffic regulation in strict conformity with a state statute and the statutory penalty is doubled if the violation results in harm to a vulnerable highway user, the applicable ordinance penalty for the ordinance violation must also include the doubling of the forfeiture.

Current law allows a court to order a person who is convicted of a traffic violation to attend traffic safety school. However, as discussed above, for a vehicle failure-to-yield violation, DOT, rather than a court, must order the violator to attend a vehicle right-of-way course.

Current law prohibits a person from causing bodily harm, great bodily harm, or death to another by the negligent operation of a vehicle (reckless driving). A person who commits a reckless driving violation that causes great bodily harm or death must have his or her operating privilege revoked by DOT for one year.

Under this bill, if a person is convicted of a reckless driving violation that causes great bodily harm or death, or of causing the death of another or great bodily harm or injury to another by OWI, DOT must order the person to attend a safe driver course approved by DOT and the person must successfully complete the course before DOT may reinstate the person's operating privilege. This course is required in addition to any other penalty imposed for the violation.

Under current law, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) must approve driver education courses offered by school districts, county children with disabilities education boards, and technical college districts. DPI must also establish minimum standards for driver education courses offered by private driver schools. DPI may not approve a driver education course or establish driver education course standards unless the course or standards include certain content, such as acquainting students with the hazards posed by farm machinery and animals on highways and by railroad grade crossings and providing instruction in safely dealing with these hazards.

Under current law, the Technical College System Board (TCSB) must approve courses of study for each program offered in technical college district schools, including driver education courses. TCSB may not approve a driver education course unless the course includes certain content, such as acquainting students with the hazards posed by farm machinery and animals on highways and by railroad grade crossings and providing instruction in safely dealing with these hazards. DOT licenses private driver schools and DOT may not license a driver school unless its course of instruction includes the content required for TCSB approval of a driver education course.

Under this bill, all approved driver education courses must acquaint each student with the hazards posed by motor vehicles to vulnerable highway users and provide at least 30 minutes of instruction in safely dealing with these hazards.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

14 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 6 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (14)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 1 · Feb 7, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 1 · Feb 7, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 2 · Feb 7, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 31, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 8, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 253.

  3. Apr 7, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 1, 2014

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 31, 2014

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 25, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Mar 21, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  8. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Feb 7, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Feb 7, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 2.

  12. Oct 29, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Oct 15, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Oct 11, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Oct 8, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Sep 30, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Sep 24, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Sep 23, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  19. Sep 23, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Bies, Zepnick, Ballweg, Berceau, Billings, Czaja, Doyle, Kahl, T. Larson, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Riemer, Ripp and Sinicki; cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Shilling, T. Cullen, Lehman, Risser and Schultz

  2. Sep 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Sep 24, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 30, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Oct 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Oct 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Oct 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  10. Jan 10, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Bies

  11. Jan 24, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Bies

  12. Feb 4, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  13. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  14. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  15. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 2

  16. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  17. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Bies

  18. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 10:05 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28

  19. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  21. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  24. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Mar 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  26. Mar 25, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  27. Mar 25, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  28. Mar 31, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  29. Mar 31, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-1-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  30. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  31. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  32. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  33. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  34. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  35. Apr 2, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  36. Apr 4, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-4-2014

  37. Apr 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014

  38. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 253

  39. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-9-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote