Assembly Bill 39
Powers and duties of an electric transmission company and certificates of public convenience and necessity and permits for certain electric generating facilities and high-voltage transmission lines
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 20, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
With certain exceptions, current law prohibits a person from constructing a large electric generating facility or high-voltage transmission line unless the Public Service Commission (PSC) has granted the person a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN). Current law defines a "large electric generating facility" as a facility designed for nominal operation at a capacity of 100 megawatts or more and a "high-voltage transmission line" as an electric transmission line exceeding one mile in length that is designed for operation at a nominal voltage of 100 kilovolts or more. Within 30 days after an application for a CPCN is filed, the PSC must determine whether the application is complete. If the PSC determines that an application is incomplete, the PSC must notify the applicant, who is allowed to refile the application. If the PSC fails to determine that an application is complete within 30 days after filing, current law provides that the application is considered to be complete. This bill clarifies that an application is considered to be complete if the PSC fails to determine that the application is complete within 30 days after filing or refiling of the application.
Current law also requires the PSC, within ten days after an application for a CPCN is filed, to submit copies of the application to the clerk of each city, village, and town in which the proposed large electric generating facility or high-voltage transmission line is to be located and to the main public library in each such county.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill requires instead that the PSC must submit the copies within ten days after the PSC determines that the application is complete or after the application is considered to be complete. In addition, current law requires an applicant for a CPCN for a high-voltage transmission line to submit a detailed project plan to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) at least 60 days prior to filing the CPCN application. This bill eliminates the requirement to submit the plan to DNR.
Current law also provides that, if an applicant for a CPCN is also required to obtain one or more permits from DNR, the applicant must use a procedure for submitting only one application to DNR for all of the required DNR permits (combined permit procedure), rather than submitting separate applications to DNR for each permit. However, the combined permit procedure does not apply if the only DNR permit the applicant is required to obtain is a storm water discharge permit.
Current law specifies two deadlines for DNR to complete action on the permit applications. The first deadline is that DNR must complete action within 120 days after the date on which the permit application is complete or considered to be complete. Like the PSC, current law requires DNR to determine whether an application is complete within 30 days after filing, allows an applicant to refile an application that is incomplete, and specifies that, if DNR fails to determine that an application is complete within 30 days after filing or refiling, the application is considered to be complete. The second deadline is that DNR must complete action on the permit application within 30 days after the PSC issues its decision on the CPCN application. This bill provides that, if the combined permit procedure applies to an applicant, the second deadline applies to DNR, and not the first deadline.
Also under current law, certain electric utilities have contributed their transmission facilities to a transmission company, which is defined, in part, as a company whose sole purpose is the planning, constructing, operating, maintaining, and expanding of transmission facilities that it owns. In addition, under current law, the transmission company has certain duties and powers, including the power to purchase or acquire transmission facilities in addition to those contributed by the electric utilities, subject to any approvals that are required under federal or state law. This bill revises that power so that the transmission company is also allowed to purchase or acquire the right to provide transmission service over transmission facilities that it does not own. The bill makes a related change to the definition of "transmission company" so that the purpose of the transmission company is to provide transmission service, which is not limited to transmission facilities that it owns. Finally, the bill specifies that the transmission company may exercise its powers either directly or through one or more affiliates.
Who's behind it
Mark Honadel, a Republican, is its .
1 more lawmaker .
See all 2 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Mark Honadel · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (1)
- Paul F. Farrow · Republican, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote on an amendment
Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 3, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote on an amendment
Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 3, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote to recommend it
Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 3, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 8, 2014
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 3, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 3, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.
-
Apr 3, 2013
“Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Apr 3, 2013
“Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 19, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 20, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.
-
Feb 20, 2013
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 20, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Honadel; cosponsored by Senator Farrow
- Feb 20, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Energy and Utilities
- Mar 7, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Honadel
- Mar 7, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Honadel
- Mar 19, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 2, 2013 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 3, 2013 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Apr 3, 2013 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Apr 3, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Apr 3, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Apr 4, 2013 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-9-2013 by Committee on Rules
- Apr 9, 2013 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote