Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: modifying the requirements for sharing tax increments by tax incremental districts and limiting the participation of certain special purpose districts in tax incremental district financing. (FE)
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a
TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several
steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the
proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local
planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed
project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID.
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or
village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing
costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the
allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23
years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year
in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally
make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended
termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the
expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.
A TID is required to terminate, under current law and with some exceptions,
once its project costs are paid back. Under one of the exceptions, which is limited to
certain circumstances, after a TID pays off its project costs, but not later than the
date on which it must otherwise terminate, the planning commission may allocate
positive tax increments generated by the TID (the "donor" TID) to another TID (the
"donee" TID) that has been created by the planning commission. To share tax
increments in this way, current law requires that the donor and donee TIDs must
have the same overlying taxing jurisdictions.
Under this bill, for a TID that exists on the effective date of the bill, TIDs may
share tax increments notwithstanding the fact that they do not have the same
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Brooks (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Spiros (R)
1 cosponsors
Fitzgerald (R)
Full history
- Feb 1, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kleefisch, Brooks and Spiros; cosponsored by Senator Fitzgerald
- Feb 1, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State and Local Finance
- Feb 26, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 20, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1