Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: the sharing of tax increments. (FE)
Municipality Property tax Revenue, department of
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are
required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within
specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission
of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the
common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council
or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base value" of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city
or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;
financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR
authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,
20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID
and the year in which it was created.
Under certain limited circumstances, a TID that has paid off all of its project
costs but has not reached its mandatory termination date may become a donor TID,
continue to receive tax increments, and forward those increments to a recipient TID
created by the same city or village.
Under current law, the environmental remediation tax incremental financing
program permits a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) to recoup the
costs of remediating contaminated property from property taxes that are levied on
the remediated property. The mechanism for financing remediation costs is very
similar to the mechanism for financing project costs under the tax incremental
financing program.
Initially, the governing body of a political subdivision adopts a resolution
creating an environmental remediation tax incremental district (ERTID) with
particular boundaries. This resolution is then reviewed by a joint review board made
up of representatives of the overlying taxing jurisdictions. If the joint review board
approves the ERTID, a political subdivision that has incurred eligible costs to
remediate environmental pollution on a parcel of property may apply to DOR to
certify the environmental remediation tax incremental base of the parcel. DOR is
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 4, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Steineke, Murphy, Born and Ohnstad; cosponsored by Senator Cowles
- Oct 4, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State and Local Finance
- Oct 28, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Steineke
- Feb 5, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1