Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: court orders regarding the installation of an ignition interlock device. (FE)
Drunken driving Legislature — Criminal penalties, joint review committee on Motor vehicle — Equipment
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a court is required to order that a person's motor vehicle
operating privilege be restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an
ignition interlock device if a person commits a second or subsequent offense related
to operating a vehicle while intoxicated or a first offense while his or her alcohol
concentration is 0.15 or greater, refuses to take a test for intoxication, or injures or
kills a person while operating a vehicle while intoxicated. Under current law, the
operating privilege restriction begins on the date the Department of Transportation
issues an operator's license and stays in place for not less than one year nor more
than the maximum operating privilege revocation period permitted for the refusal
or violation. A person who violates the operating privilege restriction by failing to
install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise tampering with the ignition interlock
device may be fined not less than $150 nor more than $600, imprisoned for not more
than six months, or both, for the first offense, and may be fined not less than $300
nor more than $1,000, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both, for a
second or subsequent offense.
Currently, the court may order that the ignition interlock device be installed
immediately upon issuing the order that the person's operating privilege be
restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device installed.
Under this bill, when a court orders that the person's operating privilege be
restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device, the court must
order that the device be installed within 3 working days of the order restricting the
person's operating privilege. Also under this bill, the operating privilege restriction
takes effect immediately upon the issuing of the order restricting the person's
operating privilege. The operating privilege restriction remains in place for not less
than one year after DOT issues an operator's license nor more than the maximum
operating privilege revocation period after DOT issues an operator's license. A
violation of the operating privilege restriction is subject to the same penalty provided
for failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise tampering with the
ignition interlock device.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to
result if the bill is enacted.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 3
Passed 5–3 Oct 31, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 28, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives J. Ott, Richards, Thiesfeldt, Kolste, Nass, Brooks, Berceau, Zepnick and Kerkman; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, L. Taylor and Lehman
- Oct 28, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Oct 29, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 29, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 29, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-5-2013 by Committee on Rules
- Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives J. Ott, Goyke, Wachs and Hebl
- Nov 4, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 6, 2013 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 6, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Labor
- Jan 3, 2014 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor
- Jan 7, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1