Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: law enforcement standards and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)
Law enforcement standards board Police
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Law Enforcement Standards Board (board) is attached
to the Department of Justice. There are 15 members on the board who serve
four-year terms and, among other duties, establish minimum educational and
training standards for law enforcement officers, tribal law enforcement officers, jail
officers, juvenile detention officers, and constables.
This bill separates the training standards into three distinct categories: 1) the
standards for law enforcement officers and tribal law enforcement officers; 2) the
standards for jail officers; and 3) the standards for juvenile detention officers. Under
the bill, constables and marshals who are given law enforcement duties are subject
to the same training standards as law enforcement officers and tribal law
enforcement officers.
The bill makes several changes to the training and education standards,
including setting forth a training and education protocol for law enforcement
students, recruits, and temporary or probationary employees. Under the bill, law
enforcement officer students and tribal law enforcement officer students are
required to submit fingerprints and undergo a criminal background check. Any
person who has been convicted of a felony or of a misdemeanor related to domestic
violence may not participate in a student training program for becoming a law
enforcement officer or a tribal law enforcement officer. Under the bill, under most
circumstances a recruit or a temporary or probationary employee must complete his
or her training program within the original period of his or her temporary or
probationary employment, not to exceed 12 months, except that the board may
extend that period if the recruit or employer shows good cause for the board to do so.
The bill eliminates specific hour requirements for training and education and
allows the board to determine the specific outcome criteria and training curricula,
including the required subjects, number of hours, objectives, and measures of
performance for the training and education protocol for each category of officer. The
bill requires the board to develop model standards for use by law enforcement
agencies to show handgun proficiency and to include handgun proficiency in the
preparatory program and recertification training. The bill allows the board more
flexibility than exists under current law for determining how law enforcement
agencies are reimbursed for expenses related to training and educating officers.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Mar 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Mar 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Mar 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 1, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Bies, Ballweg, T. Larson, A. Ott, Richards and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, L. Taylor and Lehman
- Nov 1, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice
- Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 19, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 6, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Bies
- Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 31, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Bies
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Mar 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Mar 7, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Mar 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Mar 10, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Bies
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1