Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 488

Involuntary commitment proceedings and limited appearance by corporation counsel. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 23, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 4, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 12, 2013

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 22, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 340

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 23, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may petition for involuntary commitment of an individual if the petition for examination (three-person petition) is signed by three adult persons, at least one of whom has personal knowledge of the conduct of the individual, except in certain situations where a court finds a juvenile not responsible for an offense by reason of mental disease or defect or not competent to proceed with the criminal proceedings. The three-person petition must allege that the individual is mentally ill, drug dependent, or developmentally disabled, is a proper subject for treatment, and is dangerous. For purposes of involuntary commitment, an individual is dangerous, under current law, because the individual evidences any of the following: 1) a substantial probability of physical harm to himself or herself as manifested by evidence of recent threats of or attempts at suicide or serious bodily harm; 2) a substantial probability of physical harm to other individuals as manifested by evidence of recent homicidal or other violent behavior or by evidence that others are placed in reasonable fear of violent behavior and serious physical harm to themselves; 3) impaired judgment manifested by evidence of a pattern of recent acts or omissions such that there is substantial probability of physical impairment or injury to himself or herself; 4) an inability to satisfy certain basic needs, due to mental illness, so that a substantial probability exists that death, serious physical injury, serious physical debilitation, or serious physical disease will imminently ensue without prompt and adequate treatment for mental illness; or 5) for an individual who is not alleged to be drug dependent or developmentally disabled, incapability of expressing an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of accepting medication or treatment and the alternatives, or substantial incapability of applying that understanding to his or her mental illness and a substantial probability that the individual needs care or treatment to prevent further disability or deterioration and that he or she will, if left untreated, lack services necessary for health and safety and suffer severe mental, emotional, or physical harm that will result in the loss of the individual's ability to function independently or the loss of cognitive or volitional control over thoughts and actions (grounds for involuntary commitment). Current law provides an additional procedure if a three-person petition is filed based on the fifth ground for involuntary commitment. Current law also sets forth certain exceptions and requirements if the subject of the three-person petition is an inmate of a prison, jail, or other criminal detention facility or if the subject has been in inpatient treatment for mental illness, developmental disability, or drug dependency immediately before commencement of involuntary commitment proceedings. Current law also provides alternate grounds for commitment.

In addition to one of the grounds for involuntary commitment, the three-person petition must contain the names and addresses of the petitioners and their relationship to the subject individual and the names and addresses of individuals with a certain relationship to that individual. Current law requires that the petition contain a clear and concise statement of the facts which constitute probable cause to believe the allegations of the three-person petition. Current law requires the petition to be sworn to be true. Under current law, if the petitioner does not have personal knowledge of the conduct of the subject individual, the petition must contain a statement providing the basis for the petitioner's belief.

Read the full summary

Under current law, upon filing of the three-person petition, the court must review the petition to determine whether to issue an order of detention. The individual who is the subject of the petition must be detained only if there is cause to believe that the individual is mentally ill, drug dependent, or developmentally disabled and that the individual demonstrates one of the grounds for involuntary commitment or an alternate ground for commitment based on specific recent overt acts, attempts or threats to act, or a pattern of recent acts or omissions made by the individual.

Under current law, if an individual is detained based on the three-person petition or if the person had been detained on an emergency detention, the court must hold a hearing to determine whether there is probable cause to believe the allegations made in the three-person petition or in the petition originating from the emergency detention within 72 hours after the individual arrives at the facility, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, unless the subject individual or his or her counsel requests a postponement. If, at the probable cause hearing, the court determines there is probable cause to believe the allegations in the petition, the court must schedule a final hearing on involuntary commitment within 14 days of the time of detention at the facility, with certain exceptions. Under current law, the corporation counsel must represent the interests of the public in the conduct of these hearings and all other mental health proceedings in the statutes, with certain exceptions, including the drafting of all necessary papers related to the action.

This bill provides a procedure for the corporation counsel to make a limited appearance in certain involuntary commitment proceedings. If corporation counsel does not believe that involuntary commitment is appropriate for the subject individual, he or she shall inform the person seeking the three-person petition that the person may discontinue pursuing the involuntary commitment or request that corporation counsel file the petition under a limited appearance. If the person seeking the three-person petition requests a limited appearance by corporation counsel, corporation counsel shall notify the person of the scope of what he or she will do as corporation counsel under the limited appearance and file the three-person petition in a timely manner, except that corporation counsel may state that the person seeking the three-person petition believes the facts constitute probable cause instead of affirming that himself or herself. Under a limited appearance under the bill, corporation counsel must also include with the petition a certification to the court that he or she is not supporting the petition but is making a limited appearance and that he or she has notified the person seeking the three-person petition of the scope of this limited appearance. The limited appearance procedure under the bill does not apply to petitions that originate from an emergency detention.

The bill also requires that the court review the three-person petition for examination within 24 hours after the petition is filed, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, to determine whether an order of detention should be issued. The bill also requires that if an individual is detained based on the three-person petition or if the person had been detained on an emergency detention, the court must schedule the hearing in addition to holding the probable cause hearing within 72 hours after the individual arrives at the facility, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, unless postponed as allowed by law.

Who's behind it

2 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 4 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 1 · Nov 6, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Health and Human Services vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Jan 16, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 23, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 23, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 340.

  3. Apr 22, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 22, 2014

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Jan 16, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  6. Jan 9, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Nov 18, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Nov 14, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Nov 14, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  10. Nov 13, 2013

    The Senate received it.

  11. Nov 12, 2013

    The Assembly passed it.

  12. Nov 11, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Nov 6, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  14. Nov 6, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.

  15. Nov 5, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Nov 5, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Nov 5, 2013

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  18. Nov 4, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.

  19. Nov 4, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jagler and Severson; cosponsored by Senator Farrow

  2. Nov 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Ballweg added as a coauthor

  4. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive session held

  7. Nov 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  8. Nov 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  9. Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 by Committee on Rules

  10. Nov 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Nov 13, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Nov 14, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Human Services

  18. Nov 14, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  19. Nov 18, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  20. Jan 9, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Jan 15, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Jan 16, 2014 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  23. Jan 16, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Jan 16, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-22-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Jan 22, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Jan 22, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Jan 22, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. Jan 22, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  29. Jan 22, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Jan 22, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  31. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 1-30-2014

  32. Apr 22, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014

  33. Apr 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 340

  34. Apr 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-24-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote