Assembly Bill 488
Involuntary commitment proceedings and limited appearance by corporation counsel. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 23, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 4, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Nov 12, 2013
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 22, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 340
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 23, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a person may petition for involuntary commitment of an individual if the petition for examination (three-person petition) is signed by three adult persons, at least one of whom has personal knowledge of the conduct of the individual, except in certain situations where a court finds a juvenile not responsible for an offense by reason of mental disease or defect or not competent to proceed with the criminal proceedings. The three-person petition must allege that the individual is mentally ill, drug dependent, or developmentally disabled, is a proper subject for treatment, and is dangerous. For purposes of involuntary commitment, an individual is dangerous, under current law, because the individual evidences any of the following: 1) a substantial probability of physical harm to himself or herself as manifested by evidence of recent threats of or attempts at suicide or serious bodily harm; 2) a substantial probability of physical harm to other individuals as manifested by evidence of recent homicidal or other violent behavior or by evidence that others are placed in reasonable fear of violent behavior and serious physical harm to themselves; 3) impaired judgment manifested by evidence of a pattern of recent acts or omissions such that there is substantial probability of physical impairment or injury to himself or herself; 4) an inability to satisfy certain basic needs, due to mental illness, so that a substantial probability exists that death, serious physical injury, serious physical debilitation, or serious physical disease will imminently ensue without prompt and adequate treatment for mental illness; or 5) for an individual who is not alleged to be drug dependent or developmentally disabled, incapability of expressing an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of accepting medication or treatment and the alternatives, or substantial incapability of applying that understanding to his or her mental illness and a substantial probability that the individual needs care or treatment to prevent further disability or deterioration and that he or she will, if left untreated, lack services necessary for health and safety and suffer severe mental, emotional, or physical harm that will result in the loss of the individual's ability to function independently or the loss of cognitive or volitional control over thoughts and actions (grounds for involuntary commitment). Current law provides an additional procedure if a three-person petition is filed based on the fifth ground for involuntary commitment. Current law also sets forth certain exceptions and requirements if the subject of the three-person petition is an inmate of a prison, jail, or other criminal detention facility or if the subject has been in inpatient treatment for mental illness, developmental disability, or drug dependency immediately before commencement of involuntary commitment proceedings. Current law also provides alternate grounds for commitment.
In addition to one of the grounds for involuntary commitment, the three-person petition must contain the names and addresses of the petitioners and their relationship to the subject individual and the names and addresses of individuals with a certain relationship to that individual. Current law requires that the petition contain a clear and concise statement of the facts which constitute probable cause to believe the allegations of the three-person petition. Current law requires the petition to be sworn to be true. Under current law, if the petitioner does not have personal knowledge of the conduct of the subject individual, the petition must contain a statement providing the basis for the petitioner's belief.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, upon filing of the three-person petition, the court must review the petition to determine whether to issue an order of detention. The individual who is the subject of the petition must be detained only if there is cause to believe that the individual is mentally ill, drug dependent, or developmentally disabled and that the individual demonstrates one of the grounds for involuntary commitment or an alternate ground for commitment based on specific recent overt acts, attempts or threats to act, or a pattern of recent acts or omissions made by the individual.
Under current law, if an individual is detained based on the three-person petition or if the person had been detained on an emergency detention, the court must hold a hearing to determine whether there is probable cause to believe the allegations made in the three-person petition or in the petition originating from the emergency detention within 72 hours after the individual arrives at the facility, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, unless the subject individual or his or her counsel requests a postponement. If, at the probable cause hearing, the court determines there is probable cause to believe the allegations in the petition, the court must schedule a final hearing on involuntary commitment within 14 days of the time of detention at the facility, with certain exceptions. Under current law, the corporation counsel must represent the interests of the public in the conduct of these hearings and all other mental health proceedings in the statutes, with certain exceptions, including the drafting of all necessary papers related to the action.
This bill provides a procedure for the corporation counsel to make a limited appearance in certain involuntary commitment proceedings. If corporation counsel does not believe that involuntary commitment is appropriate for the subject individual, he or she shall inform the person seeking the three-person petition that the person may discontinue pursuing the involuntary commitment or request that corporation counsel file the petition under a limited appearance. If the person seeking the three-person petition requests a limited appearance by corporation counsel, corporation counsel shall notify the person of the scope of what he or she will do as corporation counsel under the limited appearance and file the three-person petition in a timely manner, except that corporation counsel may state that the person seeking the three-person petition believes the facts constitute probable cause instead of affirming that himself or herself. Under a limited appearance under the bill, corporation counsel must also include with the petition a certification to the court that he or she is not supporting the petition but is making a limited appearance and that he or she has notified the person seeking the three-person petition of the scope of this limited appearance. The limited appearance procedure under the bill does not apply to petitions that originate from an emergency detention.
The bill also requires that the court review the three-person petition for examination within 24 hours after the petition is filed, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, to determine whether an order of detention should be issued. The bill also requires that if an individual is detained based on the three-person petition or if the person had been detained on an emergency detention, the court must schedule the hearing in addition to holding the probable cause hearing within 72 hours after the individual arrives at the facility, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, unless postponed as allowed by law.
Who's behind it
2 lawmakers are its . All 2 are Republicans.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 4 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- John Jagler · Republican, Senate
- Erik Severson · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Paul F. Farrow · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 1 · Nov 6, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Health and Human Services vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 1 · Jan 16, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 23, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 23, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 340.
-
Apr 22, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 22, 2014
The Senate passed it too.
-
Jan 16, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.
-
Jan 9, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 18, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 14, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 14, 2013
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.
-
Nov 13, 2013
The Senate received it.
-
Nov 12, 2013
The Assembly passed it.
-
Nov 11, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 6, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Nov 6, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.
-
Nov 5, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 5, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 5, 2013
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Nov 4, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.
-
Nov 4, 2013
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 4, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jagler and Severson; cosponsored by Senator Farrow
- Nov 4, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Representative Ballweg added as a coauthor
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Executive session held
- Nov 6, 2013 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 8, Noes 1
- Nov 6, 2013 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Nov 7, 2013 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 11, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 13, 2013 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 14, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Human Services
- Nov 14, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 18, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 9, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 15, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-22-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 22, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 1-30-2014
- Apr 22, 2014 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014
- Apr 23, 2014 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 340
- Apr 23, 2014 · Assembly
Published 4-24-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote