Assembly Bill 500
Emergency detention pilot program in Milwaukee County. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 8, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 11, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 13, 2014
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 1, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 235
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Published 4-9-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a law enforcement officer or certain other persons may take an individual into custody for emergency detention if the officer or other person has cause to believe that the individual is mentally ill, drug dependent, or developmentally disabled, and that the individual shows any of the following: 1) a substantial probability of physical harm to himself or herself as manifested by evidence of recent threats of or attempts at suicide or serious bodily harm; 2) a substantial probability of physical harm to other persons as manifested by evidence of recent homicidal or other violent behavior, or by evidence that others are placed in reasonable fear of violent behavior and serious physical harm, as evidenced by a recent overt act, attempt, or threat to do serious physical harm; 3) a substantial probability of physical impairment or injury to himself or herself due to impaired judgment, as manifested by evidence of a recent act or omission; or 4) due to mental illness or drug dependency, the inability to satisfy basic needs for nourishment, medical care, shelter, or safety without prompt and adequate treatment so that a substantial probability exists that death, serious physical injury, serious physical debilitation, or serious physical disease will imminently ensue unless the individual receives prompt and adequate treatment, as evidenced by behavior manifested by a recent act or omission (standards for emergency detention). The belief of the officer or other person must be based on a specific recent overt act, attempt or threat to act, or omission either observed by the officer or other person or reliably reported to the officer or other person. The county department of community programs in the county in which the individual was taken into custody must approve the need for detention, and for evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment if permitted, before the law enforcement officer or other person delivers the individual to the detention facility.
Under current law, in Milwaukee County, the law enforcement officer or other person must sign a statement of emergency detention that provides detailed, specific information on the basis for the belief that the individual meets the standards for emergency detention. The law enforcement officer or other person, in Milwaukee County, delivers the individual to a detention facility along with the statement of emergency detention. Then the treatment director of the facility must determine within 24 hours whether the individual shall be detained or detained, evaluated, diagnosed, and treated, if permitted. Current law defines the treatment director as the person who has primary responsibility for the treatment provided by a treatment facility and the term "treatment director" includes the medical director of a facility.
Read the full summary Show less
The treatment director in Milwaukee County then may detain the individual for a period not to exceed 72 hours after delivery of the individual to the facility, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. If the treatment director determines that the individual is not eligible for involuntary commitment, the treatment director must release the individual. If the treatment director determines that continued detention is appropriate, the treatment director must file the statement of detention, after supplementation if he or she desires, and notification of detention with the court having probate jurisdiction in the county in which the individual was taken into custody. The filing of the statement and notification has the same effect as a petition for involuntary commitment.
This bill creates a pilot program to grant authority to certain individuals to initiate an emergency detention in Milwaukee County for approximately two years before the pilot program terminates. The pilot program for Milwaukee County under the bill operates in addition to the statutory procedures for emergency detention under current law. Under the bill, in Milwaukee County, a treatment director or treatment director designee may take an individual into custody for emergency detention under the same standards as a law enforcement officer may take an individual into custody for emergency detention under current law. "Treatment director" has the same definition as current law, but under the bill, also includes a physician or psychologist who is an employee of, or on contract with, the Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Division and who actively assumes clinical responsibility for providing emergency service care. A treatment director designee (designee) is an individual who is all of the following: 1) a licensed clinical social worker, an advanced practice social worker, a licensed professional counselor, a licensed marriage and family therapist, or a psychiatric nurse; 2) an employee of, or on contract with, the Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Division; and 3) an individual who may provide care to individuals in accordance with and as permitted by licensure laws in collaboration with a treatment director who is assigned to the same service or program. The treatment director or designee must transport the individual, or cause the individual to be transported, for detention to any of the facilities allowed for emergency detention under current law and must approve evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment, if permitted.
Under the Milwaukee County pilot program in the bill, the treatment director or designee who takes the individual into custody for emergency detention must sign a statement of emergency detention on the basis for the belief that the individual meets the standards for emergency detention. The treatment director or designee must designate whether the subject individual is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or drug dependent, and provide any information concerning his or her belief that the individual meets the standards for involuntary commitment. If evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment are permitted, the treatment director or designee must detain the individual for a period not to exceed 72 hours after delivery of the individual to the detention facility, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. The bill requires the treatment director or designee to promptly file the original statement of emergency detention with any supplemental statement and notification of detention with the court having probate jurisdiction in the county in which the individual was taken into custody. The filing of that statement and notification has the same effect as a petition for involuntary commitment.
Before the date of termination of the pilot program in Milwaukee County, the legislative audit bureau must begin a performance evaluation audit of the pilot program including details specified in the bill. The bill requires certain Milwaukee County entities to provide access to information for and cooperate with the audit.
Who's behind it
17 lawmakers are its . 14 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 21 names Hide the names
Authors (17)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Penny Bernard Schaber · Democrat, Assembly
- Eric Genrich · Democrat, Assembly
- Evan Goyke · Democrat, Assembly
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Robb Kahl · Democrat, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Daniel Riemer · Democrat, Assembly
- Joe Sanfelippo · Republican, Assembly
- Erik Severson · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Dana Wachs · Democrat, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
- JoCasta Zamarripa · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (4)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Nikiya Harris Dodd · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 0 · Jan 15, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 31, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 8, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 8, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 235.
-
Apr 7, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 1, 2014
The Senate passed it too.
-
Apr 1, 2014
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 31, 2014
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 17, 2014
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 14, 2014
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 13, 2014
The Assembly passed it.
-
Jan 15, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 15, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.
-
Nov 21, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 13, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 11, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.
-
Nov 11, 2013
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 11, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Pasch, Severson, Sanfelippo, Zepnick, Young, Sinicki, Zamarripa, Goyke, Johnson, Riemer, Ballweg, Bernard Schaber, Wachs, Pope, Ohnstad, Genrich and Kahl; cosponsored by Senators Harris, Lassa and Lehman
- Nov 11, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health
- Nov 13, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 21, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 9, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 15, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-13-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 14, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 31, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 31, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-1-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 2, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 4, 2014 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Apr 4, 2014 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 4-4-2014
- Apr 7, 2014 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 235
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Published 4-9-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote