Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: workforce growth grants to technical college districts and making an appropriation. (FE)
Industrial development Technical college Technical college system board
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill allows a technical college district board to obtain grants from the
Technical College System Board for the purpose of partnering with a business,
consortium of businesses, economic development organization, or local workforce
development board in a project to help meet local needs for supporting economic
sectors with a documented skills gap or high workforce shortage, including
manufacturing, energy, information technology, skilled trades, and health care. A
project may provide for activities that address development of individuals prior to
entering the workforce and workforce training, including any of the following: 1) job
training scholarships based on local labor market needs; 2) building or
infrastructure construction; 3) equipment and material purchases; 4) faculty hiring;
5) development of certain curricula; or 6) student career support services, including
job placement and business recruitment. The bill directs the Technical College
System Board to award grants to technical college districts that apply to the board
to fund the costs of such projects. In awarding the grants, the bill requires the
Technical College System Board to consider the speed by which the activities
specified in applications could meet training and employment needs and give a
preference to projects that seek to eliminate waiting lists for courses pertaining to
jobs with high employment demand.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Workforce Development and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 57
Failed 39–57 Jun 13, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Workforce Development and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 56
Failed 39–56 Nov 5, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 1, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Doyle, Barca, Danou, Krug, Jorgensen, Hulsey, Hebl, Bernard Schaber, Berceau, Kahl, Milroy, Richards, Kolste, Ringhand, Ohnstad and Johnson; cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Shilling, Lehman, C. Larson, Miller, Jauch, Vinehout and Hansen
- Mar 1, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development
- Mar 5, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Workforce Development and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 57
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Representative Sinicki added as a coauthor
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Workforce Development and take up, Ayes 39, Noes 56
- Nov 8, 2013 · Assembly
Representative Billings added as a coauthor
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1