Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 529

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: employment discrimination on the basis of family status. (FE)

Discrimination in employment Family Family — Support

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law prohibits discrimination in employment on various bases,

including the basis of marital status, which is defined as the status of being married,

single, divorced, separated, or widowed. Current law provides, however, that it is not

employment discrimination because of marital status to prohibit an individual from

directly supervising or being directly supervised by his or her spouse.

This bill prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of family status,

which is defined in the bill as: 1) having responsibility for the full-time or part-time

care of a child, spouse, domestic partner, parent, or other relative; or 2) being married

to or in a domestic partnership with a particular person or being a relative of a

particular person. The bill provides, however, that it is not employment

discrimination because of family status to prohibit an individual from directly

supervising or being directly supervised by a relative or domestic partner.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Clark (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hulsey (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kahl (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Ringhand (D) , Sargent (D) , Sinicki (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wright (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)

4 cosponsors

C. Larson (D) , Harris (D) , Lehman (D) , Risser (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Labor and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 58

Failed 38–58 Feb 18, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Riemer, Genrich, Barnes, Berceau, Billings, Clark, Goyke, Hesselbein, Hulsey, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kessler, Mason, Ohnstad, Pasch, Pope, Ringhand, Sargent, Sinicki, C. Taylor, Vruwink, Wright, Young, Zamarripa and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Harris, C. Larson, Lehman and Risser

  2. Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor

  3. Jan 6, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Labor and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 58

  5. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1