Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: employment discrimination on the basis of family status. (FE)
Discrimination in employment Family Family — Support
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law prohibits discrimination in employment on various bases,
including the basis of marital status, which is defined as the status of being married,
single, divorced, separated, or widowed. Current law provides, however, that it is not
employment discrimination because of marital status to prohibit an individual from
directly supervising or being directly supervised by his or her spouse.
This bill prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of family status,
which is defined in the bill as: 1) having responsibility for the full-time or part-time
care of a child, spouse, domestic partner, parent, or other relative; or 2) being married
to or in a domestic partnership with a particular person or being a relative of a
particular person. The bill provides, however, that it is not employment
discrimination because of family status to prohibit an individual from directly
supervising or being directly supervised by a relative or domestic partner.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Clark (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hulsey (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kahl (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Ringhand (D) , Sargent (D) , Sinicki (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wright (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Labor and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 58
Failed 38–58 Feb 18, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Riemer, Genrich, Barnes, Berceau, Billings, Clark, Goyke, Hesselbein, Hulsey, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kessler, Mason, Ohnstad, Pasch, Pope, Ringhand, Sargent, Sinicki, C. Taylor, Vruwink, Wright, Young, Zamarripa and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Harris, C. Larson, Lehman and Risser
- Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor
- Jan 6, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Labor and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 58
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1